We-Math: Does Your Large Multimodal Model Achieve Human-like Mathematical Reasoning? (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Runqi Qiao, Qiuna Tan, Guanting Dong, MinhuiWu MinhuiWu, Chong Sun, Xiaoshuai Song, Jiapeng Wang, Zhuoma GongQue, Shanglin Lei, YiFan Zhang, Zhe Wei, Miaoxuan Zhang, Runfeng Qiao, Xiao Zong, Yida Xu, Peiqing Yang, Zhimin Bao, Muxi Diao, Chen Li, Honggang Zhang
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focus more on end-to-end performance, but neglect the underlying principles of knowledge acquisition and generalization. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark specifically designed to explore the problem-solving principles by decomposing 6.5K visual math problems into 10.9K step-level questions for evaluation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark covers 6.5K visual math problems and 10.9K step-level questions spanning 5 layers of knowledge granularity and 67 hierarchical knowledge concepts. |
Similar Papers
A Survey of Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning: From Perception, Alignment to Reasoning (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Tianyu Yang, Sihong Wu, Yilun Zhao, Zhenwen Liang, Lisen Dai, Chen Zhao, Minhao Cheng, Arman Cohan, Xiangliang Zhang
| Challenge: | Multimodal mathematical Reasoning (MMR) has attracted increasing attention for its ability to solve mathematical problems involving both textual and visual modalities. |
| Approach: | They review the theoretical frameworks of multimodal reasoning and examine the challenges they face in visual math tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models can solve problems involving both textual and visual modalities. |
A Survey of Mathematical Reasoning in the Era of Multimodal Large Language Model: Benchmark, Method & Challenges (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Yibo Yan, Jiamin Su, Jianxiang He, Fangteng Fu, Xu Zheng, Yuanhuiyi Lyu, Kun Wang, Shen Wang, Qingsong Wen, Xuming Hu
| Challenge: | This survey provides **the first comprehensive analysis of mathematical reasoning in the era of multimodal large language models** . integrating large language model with mathematical reasoning tasks is becoming significant as AI advances . |
| Approach: | They review over 200 studies published since 2021 and examine the state-of-the-art developments in Math-LLMs . they identify five major challenges hindering the realization of AGI in this domain . |
| Outcome: | The authors examine the state-of-the-art developments in Math-LLMs with a focus on multimodal settings. |
MM-MATH: Advancing Multimodal Math Evaluation with Process Evaluation and Fine-grained Classification (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for multimodal reasoning in large multimodal models are underperforming on multimodal tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark for multimodal reasoning in large multimodal models, MM-MATH . MM's process evaluation employs LMM-as-a-judge to automatically analyze solution steps . diagram misinterpretation is the most common error, they find . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves only 31% accuracy, compared to 82% for humans. |
The Role of Visual Modality in Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning: Challenges and Insights (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yufang Liu, Yao Du, Tao Ji, Jianing Wang, Yang Liu, Yuanbin Wu, Aimin Zhou, Mengdi Zhang, Xunliang Cai
| Challenge: | Existing models that leverage visual information do not improve math reasoning performance . authors suggest that visual information is important for multimodal reasoning . |
| Approach: | They propose a dataset to require image reliance for problem-solving and challenge models with similar, yet distinct, images that change the correct answer. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performance is unaffected by changes to or removal of images in the dataset. |
MathSight: A Benchmark Exploring Have Vision-Language Models Really Seen in University-Level Mathematical Reasoning? (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks rarely isolate how much visual information contributes to reasoning . a growing collection of benchmarks has catalyzed rapid progress in multimodal reasoning - but how much it contributes remains unclear . |
| Approach: | They propose a university-level multimodal mathematical reasoning benchmark to quantify the effect of visual input. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark disentangles and quantifies the effect of visual input on multimodal reasoning models. |
StatsChartMWP: A Dataset for Evaluating Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning Abilities on Math Word Problems with Statistical Charts (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | StatsChartMWP is a dataset for evaluating visual mathematical reasoning abilities on math word problems with statistical charts. |
| Approach: | They propose a dataset for evaluating visual mathematical reasoning abilities on math word problems with statistical charts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is more effective than open-source approaches. |
MathCanvas: Intrinsic Visual Chain-of-Thought for Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Weikang Shi, Aldrich Yu, Rongyao Fang, Houxing Ren, Ke Wang, Aojun Zhou, Changyao Tian, Xinyu Fu, Yuxuan Hu, Zimu Lu, Linjiang Huang, Si Liu, Rui Liu, Hongsheng Li
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to visual chain-of-thought are limited by external tools or fail to generate high-fidelity diagrams. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to enable large multimodal models with VCoT capabilities . they pre-train a model on a 15.2M-pair corpus and teach it how to leverage visual aids . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework unlocks complex, human-like visual reasoning in large language models . it pre-trains the model on a 15.2M-pair corpus and fine-tunes it on MathCanvas-Instruct . |
LILA: A Unified Benchmark for Mathematical Reasoning (2022.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Swaroop Mishra, Matthew Finlayson, Pan Lu, Leonard Tang, Sean Welleck, Chitta Baral, Tanmay Rajpurohit, Oyvind Tafjord, Ashish Sabharwal, Peter Clark, Ashwin Kalyan
| Challenge: | Towards evaluating and improving AI systems in this domain, we propose a mathematical reasoning benchmark based on 23 diversetasks . |
| Approach: | They propose a mathematical reasoning benchmark that includes 23 diverse tasks . they extend the benchmark by collecting task instructions and solutions in the form of Python programs . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves on multi-tasking while the best performing model only achieves 60.40%. |
MathCoder-VL: Bridging Vision and Code for Enhanced Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Ke Wang, Junting Pan, Linda Wei, Aojun Zhou, Weikang Shi, Zimu Lu, Han Xiao, Yunqiao Yang, Houxing Ren, Mingjie Zhan, Hongsheng Li
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LMMs) struggle with simple tasks such as geometry, e.g., arithmetic, and reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose to leverage code as supervision for cross-modal alignment . they propose to use FigCodifier and ImgCode-8.6M to synthesize novel mathematical figures . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model surpasses GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet in the geometry problem-solving subset of MathVista, achieving improvements of 8.9% and 9.2%. |
Math-LLaVA: Bootstrapping Mathematical Reasoning for Multimodal Large Language Models (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing image instruction fine-tuning datasets do not fully exploit visual information to enhance multimodal reasoning capabilities of Large language models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose a LLaVA-based model fine-tuned with MathV360K to bridge this gap by collecting 40K high-quality images with question-answer pairs from 24 existing datasets and synthesizing 320K new pairs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves the multimodal reasoning capabilities of LLaVA-1.5 and demonstrates enhanced generalizability on the MMMU benchmark. |