Papers by Xinhe Wang
Beyond Blind Following: Evaluating Robustness of LLM Agents under Imperfect Guidance (2026.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yao Fu, Ran Qiu, Xinhe Wang, Jacob Sansom, Sathvika Ayyappa Prabhu, Huijie Tang, Jaekyeom Kim, Sungryull Sohn, Honglak Lee
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong capabilities as task-solving agents across interactive domains, but in complex environments, auxiliary guidance may be imperfect. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to measure the robustness of large language models under imperfect guidance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark compared LLM agents in navigation, cooking, and gaming in a variety of environments with auxiliary guidance and noisy or underspecified instructions extracted from demonstrations. |
Your Reasoning Benchmark May Not Test Reasoning: Revealing Perception Bottleneck in Abstract Reasoning Benchmarks (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus and ARC-AGI are widely used to assess progress in artificial intelligence. |
| Approach: | They propose a two-stage pipeline that separates perception and reasoning . they propose to test this pipeline against standard end-to-end one-stage evaluation . |
| Outcome: | The proposed pipeline separates perception and reasoning, and isolates reasoning from bottlenecks. |
Interactive and Expressive Code-Augmented Planning with Large Language Models (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Anthony Zhe Liu, Xinhe Wang, Jacob Sansom, Yao Fu, Jongwook Choi, Sungryull Sohn, Jaekyeom Kim, Honglak Lee
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have strong abilities in common-sense reasoning and interactive decision-making, but struggle with complex, long-horizon planning tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a code-based LLM planning approach that is code-expressive while also dynamically adapting from errors. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach can be error-prone and insufficient for handling ambiguous or unstructured data. |