TPS-Bench: Evaluating AI Agents’ Tool Planning & Scheduling Abilities in Compounding Tasks (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language model (LLM) agents have demonstrated strong problem-solving competence across domains like research and coding. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a tool repository to analyze the ability of large language model agents to solve complex problems. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms open-source and closed-source models in task completion rate and efficiency. |
Similar Papers
TPTU-v2: Boosting Task Planning and Tool Usage of Large Language Model-based Agents in Real-world Industry Systems (2024.emnlp-industry)
Copied to clipboard
Yilun Kong, Jingqing Ruan, YiHong Chen, Bin Zhang, Tianpeng Bao, Shi Shiwei, Du Qing, Xiaoru Hu, Hangyu Mao, Ziyue Li, Xingyu Zeng, Rui Zhao, Xueqian Wang
| Challenge: | Large language models have demonstrated proficiency in addressing tasks that necessitate a combination of task planning and the usage of external tools. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to enhance the task planning and tool usage abilities of LLMs in industrial systems. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework enhances the task planning and tool usage abilities of LLM-based agents in industrial systems. |
TelAgentBench: A Multi-faceted Benchmark for Evaluating LLM-based Agents in Telecommunications (2025.emnlp-industry)
Copied to clipboard
Sunwoo Lee, Daseong Jang, Dhammiko Arya, Gyoung-eun Han, Injee Song, SaeRom Kim, Sangjin Kim, Seojin Lee, Seokyoung Hong, Sereimony Sek, Seung-Mo Cho, Sohee Park, Sungbin Yoon, Wonbeom Jang, Eric Davis
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are becoming powerful agentic systems . generic benchmarks fail to assess realistic, non-English performance . |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate five core agentic capabilities: Reasoning, Planning, Action (tool-use), Retrieval-Augmented Generation, and Instruction Following. |
| Outcome: | The evaluations reveal significant performance disparities between models that employ explicit reasoning and those that do not. |
Small LLMs Are Weak Tool Learners: A Multi-LLM Agent (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing with impressive capabilities, but they lack domain specificity, real-time information and face challenges in solving specialized problems. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-LLM approach that decomposes the aforementioned capabilities into a planner, caller, and summarizer. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing models by demonstrating its effectiveness and advantages in tool learning. |
CostBench: Evaluating Multi-Turn Cost-Optimal Planning and Adaptation in Dynamic Environments for LLM Tool-Use Agents (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluations of Large Language Models (LLMs) focus on task completion, but neglect a crucial capability: the ability to devise and adjust cost-optimal plans in response to changing environments. |
| Approach: | They propose a scalable, cost-centric benchmark to evaluate agents’ economic reasoning and replanning abilities. |
| Outcome: | Evaluating leading open-sourced and proprietary models on CostBench reveals a substantial gap in cost-aware planning . |
MMAU: A Holistic Benchmark of Agent Capabilities Across Diverse Domains (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
Guoli Yin, Haoping Bai, Shuang Ma, Feng Nan, Yanchao Sun, Zhaoyang Xu, Shen Ma, Jiarui Lu, Xiang Kong, Aonan Zhang, Dian Ang Yap, Yizhe Zhang, Karsten Ahnert, Vik Kamath, Mathias Berglund, Dominic Walsh, Tobias Gindele, Juergen Wiest, Zhengfeng Lai, Xiaoming Simon Wang, Jiulong Shan, Meng Cao, Ruoming Pang, Zirui Wang
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focus on specific application scenarios, emphasizing task completion but failing to dissect the underlying skills that drive these outcomes. |
| Approach: | They propose a Massive Multitask Agent Understanding benchmark that evaluates LLMs across five domains and offline tasks. |
| Outcome: | The Massive Multitask Agent Understanding (MMAU) benchmark evaluates models across five domains including Tool-use, Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) QA, Data Science and Machine Learning coding, Contest-level programming and Mathematics. |
NL ⇒ Schedule: Evaluate Multitask Scheduling Capability of Large Language Models (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for scheduling from natural language descriptions rely on experts with limited scheduling skills and domain knowledge. |
| Approach: | They propose a model to generate a feasible schedule from natural language descriptions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves more robust performance than six state-of-the-art LLM+solver methods. |
RLAE: Reinforcement Learning-Assisted Ensemble for LLMs (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing ensemble methods for ensembling large language models rely on fixed weighting strategies that fail to adapt to dynamic, context-dependent characteristics of LLMs. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that reformulates LLM ensemble through a Markov Decision Process. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing methods by 3.3% on a diverse set of tasks while achieving lower time latency. |
MultiAgentBench : Evaluating the Collaboration and Competition of LLM agents (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Kunlun Zhu, Hongyi Du, Zhaochen Hong, Xiaocheng Yang, Shuyi Guo, Zhe Wang, Zhenhailong Wang, Cheng Qian, Robert Tang, Heng Ji, Jiaxuan You
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities as autonomous agents, yet existing benchmarks focus on single-agent tasks or are confined to narrow domains, failing to capture the dynamics of multi-agent coordination and competition. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate LLM-based multi-agent systems across diverse, interactive scenarios. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework measures task completion and quality of collaboration and competition using novel, milestone-based key performance indicators. |
AgentPro: Enhancing LLM Agents with Automated Process Supervision (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing frameworks lack explicit supervision during the reasoning process, which may lead to error propagation across reasoning chains. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework which automates process supervision for large language model agents by automatically generating step-level annotations and developing a process reward model based on these annotations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing agent-based methods on four datasets and achieves a 6.32% increase in accuracy. |
MPO: Boosting LLM Agents with Meta Plan Optimization (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for interactive planning tasks suffer from planning hallucinations and require retraining for each new agent. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that leverages explicit guidance through meta plans to assist agent planning and enables continuous optimization based on feedback from the agent’s task execution. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing baselines on two representative tasks and significantly improves task completion efficiency and generalization capabilities. |