Papers with scheduling

7 papers
Dynamic Fusion Network for Multi-Domain End-to-end Task-Oriented Dialog (2020.acl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies show remarkable success in end-to-end task-oriented dialog systems . however, most models rely on large training data, which is difficult to scalable for new domains with limited labeled data.
Approach: They propose a shared-private network which exploits the relevance between the target domain and each domain.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms existing methods on multi-domain dialogue by 13.9% on average.
To Schedule or not to Schedule: Extracting Task Specific Temporal Entities and Associated Negation Constraints (2020.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing models for date-time entity extraction from text are task agnostic, resulting in insufficient results for task specific date-timing extraction.
Approach: They propose a model for extracting subset of date-time entities from text and their negation constraints.
Outcome: The proposed model achieves an absolute gain of 19% f-score points compared to baseline methods in detecting date-time entities relevant to scheduling meetings and a 4% improvement over baseline methods for detecting negation constraints over date-timing entities.
Feasible is Not Enough: Cost-Aware Optimal Tool-Chain Planning on Multi-Solution Tool Graphs (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing tools and benchmarks often form tool learning (TL) as a single-solution setting . exploring large-scale TG is computationally expensive, especially under constrained context budgets.
Approach: They propose a framework for learning optimal TL policies over large tool graphs . they train a reinforcement learning agent to acquire transferable expansion skills .
Outcome: The proposed framework improves task success and solution optimality by 46.21% and 66.34% on multiSoTLBench.
Learning to Reason Over Time: Timeline Self-Reflection for Improved Temporal Reasoning in Language Models (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models struggle with temporal reasoning, which requires processing time-related information such as event sequencing, durations, and inter-temporal relationships.
Approach: They propose a framework that enhances the temporal reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) by combining timeline construction with iterative self-reflection.
Outcome: The proposed framework improves the temporal reasoning abilities of large language models and improves traceability of the inference process.
From Language to Driving: A Dual-Loop SLM-Enhanced Framework for Multi-Planner Scheduling via a Domain-Specific Language (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent large language model-based AD research offers new avenues to address this challenge.
Approach: They propose a small language model (SLM) for high-level semantic reasoning and schedule generation, while an inner loop performs low-level, high-frequency schedule execution and vehicle control.
Outcome: The proposed framework improves instruction completion rates while maintaining high safety and compliance relative to multiple baselines.
TPS-Bench: Evaluating AI Agents’ Tool Planning & Scheduling Abilities in Compounding Tasks (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language model (LLM) agents have demonstrated strong problem-solving competence across domains like research and coding.
Approach: They propose to use a tool repository to analyze the ability of large language model agents to solve complex problems.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms open-source and closed-source models in task completion rate and efficiency.
EquiBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models’ Reasoning about Program Semantics via Equivalence Checking (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: EquiBench is a new benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to reason about program semantics . Unlike natural language, code is executable.
Approach: They propose a benchmark to evaluate large language models through equivalence checking . EquiBench consists of 2400 program pairs across four languages and six categories .
Outcome: The proposed benchmark consists of 2400 program pairs across four languages and six categories.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations