CogToM: A Comprehensive Theory of Mind Benchmark inspired by Human Cognition for Large Language Models (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Haibo Tong, Zeyang Yue, Feifei Zhao, Erliang Lin, Lu Jia, Ruolin Chen, Yinqian Sun, Qian Zhang, Yi Zeng
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for Large Language Models (LLMs) are limited to false belief tasks, highlighting bottlenecks in specific dimensions. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate Large Language Models' Theory of Mind capabilities . they evaluate 8000 bilingual instances across 46 paradigms and validated by 49 human annotators . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark reveals performance heterogeneities and bottlenecks in 22 representative models. |
Similar Papers
CogGPT: Unleashing the Power of Cognitive Dynamics on Large Language Models (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Yaojia Lv, Haojie Pan, Zekun Wang, Jiafeng Liang, Yuanxing Liu, Ruiji Fu, Ming Liu, Zhongyuan Wang, Bing Qin
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) focus on replicating human cognition in specific contexts, overlooking the inherently dynamic nature of cognition. |
| Approach: | They propose a task to assess cognitive dynamics of large language models (LLMs) they introduce a benchmark and two evaluation metrics to validate the benchmark and evaluate it through participant surveys. |
| Outcome: | The proposed task overcomes the limitations of existing methods and is available for download. |
XToM: Exploring the Multilingual Theory of Mind for Large Language Models (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Chunkit Chan, Yauwai Yim, Hongchuan Zeng, Zhiying Zou, Xinyuan Cheng, Zhifan Sun, Zheye Deng, Kawai Chung, Yuzhuo Ao, Fan Yixiang, Cheng Jiayang, Ercong Nie, Ginny Wong, Helmut Schmid, Hinrich Schuetze, Simon See, Yangqiu Song
| Challenge: | Existing evaluations of ToM in LLMs are limited to English, neglecting the linguistic diversity that shapes human cognition. |
| Approach: | They propose a multilingual benchmark that evaluates ToM across five languages . they find that models excel in multilingual language understanding, but their ToM performance varies across languages. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates LLMs across five languages and incorporates diverse task scenarios. |
CogLM: Tracking Cognitive Development of Large Language Models (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently shown remarkable abilities across a wide variety of tasks, but few studies have explored the reasons behind the evolutionary relationship among various abilities. |
| Approach: | They construct a benchmark CogLM based on Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development (PTC) which measures the cognitive levels of Large Language Models (LLMs) using 1,220 questions spanning 10 cognitive abilities crafted by more than 20 human experts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework provides a comprehensive testbed for the cognitive levels of LLMs. |
Clever Hans or Neural Theory of Mind? Stress Testing Social Reasoning in Large Language Models (2024.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Natalie Shapira, Mosh Levy, Seyed Hossein Alavi, Xuhui Zhou, Yejin Choi, Yoav Goldberg, Maarten Sap, Vered Shwartz
| Challenge: | Recent work suggests that Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit Neural Theory-of-Mind (N-ToM) however, prior work reached conflicting conclusions regarding those abilities. |
| Approach: | They examine the extent of Large Language Models’ N-ToM abilities through an extensive evaluation of 6 tasks and find that LLMs struggle with adversarial examples . |
| Outcome: | The proposed metrics show that LLMs exhibit certain N-ToM abilities, but this behavior is far from robust. |
SMART: Evaluating LLMs’ Mathematical Reasoning via a Human Cognitive Process-Inspired Benchmark (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation methods focus on the final answer or on the intermediate reasoning steps, overlooking its inherently multi-stage and multi-dimensional nature. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark that decomposes mathematical problem-solving into four cognitive dimensions and introduces dimension-specific tasks to measure their cognitive processes. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model decomposes mathematical problem-solving into four cognitive dimensions and introduces dimension-specific tasks to measure their cognitive processes. |
GPT-Fathom: Benchmarking Large Language Models to Decipher the Evolutionary Path towards GPT-4 and Beyond (2024.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing LLM leaderboards often reference scores reported in other papers without consistent settings and prompts, which may encourage cherry-picking favored settings and for better results. |
| Approach: | They propose an open-source and reproducible LLM evaluation suite built on top of OpenAI Evals that systematically evaluates 10+ leading LLMs and OpenAI’s legacy models on 20+ curated benchmarks across 7 capability categories. |
| Outcome: | The evaluation suite is built on top of OpenAI Evals and evaluates 10+ leading LLMs and OpenAI’s legacy models on 20+ curated benchmarks across 7 capability categories. |
Theory of Mind in Large Language Models: Assessment and Enhancement (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Theory of Mind (ToM) is a cornerstone of human social intelligence . Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into daily life . |
| Approach: | They analyze evaluation benchmarks and enhancement strategies to evaluate LLMs' ToM capabilities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed and widely used story-based benchmarks and enhancement strategies are used to evaluate LLMs' ToM capabilities. |
Views Are My Own, but Also Yours: Benchmarking Theory of Mind Using Common Ground (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Adil Soubki, John Murzaku, Arash Yousefi Jordehi, Peter Zeng, Magdalena Markowska, Seyed Abolghasem Mirroshandel, Owen Rambow
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for theory of mind (ToM) use synthetic data, which can misalign with human behavior. |
| Approach: | They propose a question-answer benchmark based on naturally occurring spoken dialogs to evaluate theory of mind capabilities of language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset shows that LMs struggle to demonstrate theory of mind (ToM) . |
Exploring the Capability Boundaries of LLMs in Mastering of Chinese Chouxiang Language (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Dianqing Lin, Tian Lan, Jiali Zhu, Jiang Li, Wei Chen, Xu Liu, null Aruukhan, Xiangdong Su, Hongxu Hou, Guanglai Gao
| Challenge: | Current state-of-the-art LLMs exhibit clear limitations on multiple tasks, while performing well on tasks that involve contextual semantic understanding. |
| Approach: | They propose a mouse-based benchmark to evaluate LLMs' performance on NLP tasks involving Chouxiang Language. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates the performance of LLMs on six NLP tasks involving Chouxiang Language. |
LLM-Powered Benchmark Factory: Reliable, Generic, and Efficient (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Peiwen Yuan, Shaoxiong Feng, Yiwei Li, Xinglin Wang, Yueqi Zhang, Jiayi Shi, Chuyi Tan, Boyuan Pan, Yao Hu, Kan Li
| Challenge: | Using generic and efficient benchmark generators, human annotators are limited by inefficiency . current benchmark generator methods rely on seed signals, leading to long cycles and high costs . |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to evaluate LLMs as generic benchmark generators and integrate them as BenchMaker. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves comparable performance to human-annotated benchmarks on most metrics. |