Controllable Contamination Detection for Reliable LLM Evaluation with Statistical Guarantees (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Zheng Zhang, Qi Liu, Siyuan Liang, Ning Li, Zirui Hu, Weibo Gao, Rui Li, Zhenya Huang, Leszek Rutkowski, Baosheng Yu, Dacheng Tao
| Challenge: | Existing training data detectors fail to detect clean samples from contaminated test sets . existing methods fail to identify clean samples due to black-box nature of LLMs . |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that detects and filters contaminated evaluation data . they propose 'failure detection' to reduce the proportion of contaminated samples mistakenly retained . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework reduces false discovery rate (FDR) under valid FDR control while maintaining evaluation consistency. |
Similar Papers
Generalization or Memorization: Data Contamination and Trustworthy Evaluation for Large Language Models (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Considering the vast size and wide-ranging sources of LLMs’ training data, it could explicitly or implicitly include test data. |
| Approach: | They propose a Contamination Detection via output Distribution (CDD) which detects data contamination only by identifying the peakedness of LLM's output distribution. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves performance by 21.8%-30.2% on humanEval and TED: trustworthy evaluation via output distribution. |
Does Data Contamination Detection Work (Well) for LLMs? A Survey and Evaluation on Detection Assumptions (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models have demonstrated great performance across various benchmarks, but data contamination is a concern in their evaluation. |
| Approach: | They analyze 50 papers on data contamination detection and test three of them as case studies to identify the possibility of data contamination. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods can detect membership inference attacks on instance-level data, and can perform similar to random guessing on LLM pretraining datasets. |
DCR: Quantifying Data Contamination in LLMs Evaluation (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) memorize evaluation data during training, inflating performance metrics and undermining genuine generalization assessment. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to detect and quantify benchmark data contamination (BDC) by synthesizing contamination scores via a fuzzy inference system. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework detects and quantifies BDC risk across semantic, informational, data, and label levels. |
Towards Data Contamination Detection for Modern Large Language Models: Limitations, Inconsistencies, and Oracle Challenges (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for detecting data contamination in large language models have limitations and limitations . data contamination occurs when test or evaluation data is exposed to the model during its training phases . |
| Approach: | They evaluate five different methods for detecting data contamination in large language models . they find that current methods have non-trivial limitations in their assumptions and practical applications . |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods have non-trivial limitations and difficulties in detecting contamination . the authors highlight the complexity of contamination detection in advanced LLMs . |
Data Contamination Can Cross Language Barriers (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to detect contamination of public benchmarks are too superficial to reflect deeper forms of contamination. |
| Approach: | They propose generalization-based approaches to unmask a cross-lingual form of contamination that inflates LLMs’ performance while evading current detection methods. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing detection methods while avoiding contamination of public benchmarks in the pre-training data. |
Data Contamination Calibration for Black-box LLMs (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Despite the rapid advancements of Large Language Models, the unchecked ultra-large-scale training sets introduce a series of potential risks like data contamination. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to detect contaminated training data and diminish the contamination effect by using a to-be-released dataset. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms existing methods by at least 4.5% on more 4 dataset formats, with more than 10 base LLMs. |
Unveiling the Spectrum of Data Contamination in Language Model: A Survey from Detection to Remediation (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Data contamination is a problem in Large language models due to the reliance on extensive internet-derived training corpora. |
| Approach: | They present a survey on the topic of data contamination in large language models. |
| Outcome: | The results of the first survey on data contamination in large language models provide a comprehensive guide for NLP researchers seeking a systematic understanding of the issue. |
When Benchmarks Leak: Inference-Time Decontamination for LLMs (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a large number of large language models (LLMs) are being evaluated for their performance, but their reliability is threatened by test set contamination. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that decontaminates large language models by applying small perturbations to the input embedding space. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves strong decontamination effectiveness while incurring minimal degradation in benign utility. |
LNE-Blocking: An Efficient Framework for Contamination Mitigation Evaluation on Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a problem of data contamination is now almost inevitable during the development of large language models, with the training data often integrating evaluation benchmarks even unintentionally. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to restore model performance prior to data contamination on potentially leaked datasets by using contamination detection and disruption operation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework restores model performance prior to contamination on potentially leaked datasets. |
SSA: Semantic Contamination of LLM-Driven Fake News Detection (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Evaluating 45 variants of nine LLMs, we find LIAR2 accuracy climbs monotonically with injected contamination, while the SSA Factor escalates in near-perfect lock-step. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that detects BDC risks across semantic to label level via entity shift perturbation and an interpretable metric, the SSA Factor. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework detects BDC risks across semantic to label level via entity shift perturbation and interpretable metric, the SSA Factor. |