Challenge: Existing training data detectors fail to detect clean samples from contaminated test sets . existing methods fail to identify clean samples due to black-box nature of LLMs .
Approach: They propose a framework that detects and filters contaminated evaluation data . they propose 'failure detection' to reduce the proportion of contaminated samples mistakenly retained .
Outcome: The proposed framework reduces false discovery rate (FDR) under valid FDR control while maintaining evaluation consistency.

Similar Papers

Generalization or Memorization: Data Contamination and Trustworthy Evaluation for Large Language Models (2024.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Considering the vast size and wide-ranging sources of LLMs’ training data, it could explicitly or implicitly include test data.
Approach: They propose a Contamination Detection via output Distribution (CDD) which detects data contamination only by identifying the peakedness of LLM's output distribution.
Outcome: The proposed method improves performance by 21.8%-30.2% on humanEval and TED: trustworthy evaluation via output distribution.
Does Data Contamination Detection Work (Well) for LLMs? A Survey and Evaluation on Detection Assumptions (2025.findings-naacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models have demonstrated great performance across various benchmarks, but data contamination is a concern in their evaluation.
Approach: They analyze 50 papers on data contamination detection and test three of them as case studies to identify the possibility of data contamination.
Outcome: The proposed methods can detect membership inference attacks on instance-level data, and can perform similar to random guessing on LLM pretraining datasets.
DCR: Quantifying Data Contamination in LLMs Evaluation (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) memorize evaluation data during training, inflating performance metrics and undermining genuine generalization assessment.
Approach: They propose a framework to detect and quantify benchmark data contamination (BDC) by synthesizing contamination scores via a fuzzy inference system.
Outcome: The proposed framework detects and quantifies BDC risk across semantic, informational, data, and label levels.
Towards Data Contamination Detection for Modern Large Language Models: Limitations, Inconsistencies, and Oracle Challenges (2025.coling-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for detecting data contamination in large language models have limitations and limitations . data contamination occurs when test or evaluation data is exposed to the model during its training phases .
Approach: They evaluate five different methods for detecting data contamination in large language models . they find that current methods have non-trivial limitations in their assumptions and practical applications .
Outcome: The proposed methods have non-trivial limitations and difficulties in detecting contamination . the authors highlight the complexity of contamination detection in advanced LLMs .
Data Contamination Can Cross Language Barriers (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods to detect contamination of public benchmarks are too superficial to reflect deeper forms of contamination.
Approach: They propose generalization-based approaches to unmask a cross-lingual form of contamination that inflates LLMs’ performance while evading current detection methods.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms existing detection methods while avoiding contamination of public benchmarks in the pre-training data.
Data Contamination Calibration for Black-box LLMs (2024.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Despite the rapid advancements of Large Language Models, the unchecked ultra-large-scale training sets introduce a series of potential risks like data contamination.
Approach: They propose a method to detect contaminated training data and diminish the contamination effect by using a to-be-released dataset.
Outcome: The proposed method outperforms existing methods by at least 4.5% on more 4 dataset formats, with more than 10 base LLMs.
Unveiling the Spectrum of Data Contamination in Language Model: A Survey from Detection to Remediation (2024.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Data contamination is a problem in Large language models due to the reliance on extensive internet-derived training corpora.
Approach: They present a survey on the topic of data contamination in large language models.
Outcome: The results of the first survey on data contamination in large language models provide a comprehensive guide for NLP researchers seeking a systematic understanding of the issue.
When Benchmarks Leak: Inference-Time Decontamination for LLMs (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a large number of large language models (LLMs) are being evaluated for their performance, but their reliability is threatened by test set contamination.
Approach: They propose a framework that decontaminates large language models by applying small perturbations to the input embedding space.
Outcome: The proposed framework achieves strong decontamination effectiveness while incurring minimal degradation in benign utility.
LNE-Blocking: An Efficient Framework for Contamination Mitigation Evaluation on Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a problem of data contamination is now almost inevitable during the development of large language models, with the training data often integrating evaluation benchmarks even unintentionally.
Approach: They propose a framework to restore model performance prior to data contamination on potentially leaked datasets by using contamination detection and disruption operation.
Outcome: The proposed framework restores model performance prior to contamination on potentially leaked datasets.
SSA: Semantic Contamination of LLM-Driven Fake News Detection (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Evaluating 45 variants of nine LLMs, we find LIAR2 accuracy climbs monotonically with injected contamination, while the SSA Factor escalates in near-perfect lock-step.
Approach: They propose a framework that detects BDC risks across semantic to label level via entity shift perturbation and an interpretable metric, the SSA Factor.
Outcome: The proposed framework detects BDC risks across semantic to label level via entity shift perturbation and interpretable metric, the SSA Factor.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations