| Challenge: | Existing research has focused on approximating model rankings, but such benchmarks fail to provide users and developers with a comprehensive and fine-grained understanding of a specific model’s capabilities. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that enables detailed characterization of LLM capabilities through comprehensive and fine-grained evaluation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework enables detailed characterization of large language models through comprehensive and fine-grained evaluation. |
Similar Papers
CDT: A Comprehensive Capability Framework for Large Language Models Across Cognition, Domain, and Task (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focus on isolated abilities, lacking a holistic framework for assessing LLM capabilities. |
| Approach: | They propose a Cognition-Domain-Task framework which measures a model’s capabilities across three dimensions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves performance on dataset evaluation and data selection, while achieving higher scores on general and specific benchmarks. |
Assessing the Capabilities of Large Language Models in Coreference: An Evaluation (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are a new approach to coreference resolution, but their performance is not yet fully understood. |
| Approach: | They propose that future efforts should improve scope, data, and evaluation methods of traditional coreference research to adapt to the development of LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods improve scope, data, and evaluation methods of traditional coreference research to adapt to the development of LLMs. |
T-Eval: Evaluating the Tool Utilization Capability of Large Language Models Step by Step (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Zehui Chen, Weihua Du, Wenwei Zhang, Kuikun Liu, Jiangning Liu, Miao Zheng, Jingming Zhuo, Songyang Zhang, Dahua Lin, Kai Chen, Feng Zhao
| Challenge: | Existing studies evaluate the tool utilization ability of large language models based on the final output or only consider the single-step tool calling. |
| Approach: | They propose a new approach to evaluate the tool utilization capability of large language models (LLMs) they decompose the tool usage into multiple sub-processes, including instruction following, planning, reasoning, retrieval, understanding, and review. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model exhibits consistency with the outcome-oriented evaluation and provides a more fine-grained analysis of the capabilities of LLMs. |
FAC2E: Better Understanding Large Language Model Capabilities by Dissociating Language and Cognition (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are evaluated by overall performance on various text understanding and generation tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for Fine-grAined and Cognition-grounded LLMs’ Capability Evaluation that dissociates the language-related capabilities from cognition-related ones. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework dissociates the language-related capabilities from cognition-related ones and breaks down the process of applying a specific capability into three sub-steps: recalling relevant knowledge, utilizing knowledge, and solving problems. |
FineSurE: Fine-grained Summarization Evaluation using LLMs (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for text summarization evaluation do not correlate well with human judgments . evaluators that use Likert scale scores are limited in their ability to perform deeper analysis. |
| Approach: | They propose a fine-grained evaluator specifically tailored for the summarization task using large language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves on open-source and proprietary LLMs and shows better completeness and conciseness than existing methods. |
ToolEyes: Fine-Grained Evaluation for Tool Learning Capabilities of Large Language Models in Real-world Scenarios (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
Junjie Ye, Guanyu Li, SongYang Gao, Caishuang Huang, Yilong Wu, Sixian Li, Xiaoran Fan, Shihan Dou, Tao Ji, Qi Zhang, Tao Gui, Xuanjing Huang
| Challenge: | Existing evaluations of tool learning focus on validation of tools for large language models with expected outcomes, but this focus ignores the complex capabilities required for LLMs to effectively use tools. |
| Approach: | They propose a fine-grained system for evaluation of large language models’ tool learning capabilities in authentic scenarios. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system examines seven real-world scenarios, analyzing five dimensions crucial to LLMs in tool learning: format alignment, intent comprehension, behavior planning, tool selection, and answer organization. |
StructEval: Deepen and Broaden Large Language Model Assessment via Structured Evaluation (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current evaluations for large language models use a single-item assessment paradigm . current evaluations struggle to discern whether a model possesses the required capabilities or merely memorizes/guesses the answers to specific questions. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to evaluate large language models using atomic test objectives. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation framework resists data contamination and reduces interference of potential biases, and sheds light on the design of future principled and trustworthy LLM evaluation protocols. |
Fundamental Capabilities of Large Language Models and their Applications in Domain Scenarios: A Survey (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Jiawei Li, Yizhe Yang, Yu Bai, Xiaofeng Zhou, Yinghao Li, Huashan Sun, Yuhang Liu, Xingpeng Si, Yuhao Ye, Yixiao Wu, 林一冠 林一冠, Bin Xu, Ren Bowen, Chong Feng, Yang Gao, Heyan Huang
| Challenge: | Existing benchmark-based evaluations cannot accurately reflect the performance of real-world applications. |
| Approach: | They propose a reliable strategy for domains to choose more robust LLMs for real-world applications. |
| Outcome: | The proposed strategy addresses the challenges faced by domains to choose more robust LLMs for real-world applications. |
Evaluating Large Language Models via Linguistic Profiling (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) undergo extensive evaluation against various benchmarks collected in established leaderboards to assess their performance across multiple tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a new evaluation methodology to test LLMs' sentence generation abilities under specific linguistic constraints. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation methodology is based on the 'linguistic profiling' approach and is not intended to be a task-oriented evaluation. |
On Evaluating LLMs’ Capabilities as Functional Approximators: A Bayesian Evaluation Framework (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized the way we can formulate tasks in text-in-text-out format. |
| Approach: | They propose a new evaluation framework to comprehensively assess LLMs’ function modeling abilities by adopting a Bayesian perspective of function modeling. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation framework enables LLMs to excel in utilizing prior knowledge to develop a strong understanding of the underlying function. |