Phun-Bench: Evaluating LLMs on Phonological Understanding in Chinese (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks on LLMs’ phonological abilities are either solvable through rote memorization or intertwined with other abilities, making them inadequate to measure LLM’s genuine ability in *phonological understanding*. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a Chinese benchmark to evaluate LLMs' phonological understanding to test their ability to recall correct pronunciations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that LLMs excel at recalling correct pronunciations, but struggle to leverage phonological knowledge in the flexible and intuitive way that human speakers do. |
Similar Papers
Benchmarking Chinese Commonsense Reasoning of LLMs: From Chinese-Specifics to Reasoning-Memorization Correlations (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Currently, many benchmarks evaluate the commonsense reasoning of large language models (LLMs), but most are English-based, limiting non-English evaluations. |
| Approach: | They propose to use Chinese commonsense reasoning to evaluate LLMs' commonsensing ability. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark covers both globally known and Chinese-specific commonsense reasoning abilities and can be used as a reference for future research. |
CUTE: Measuring LLMs’ Understanding of Their Tokens (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) perform well on a wide variety of tasks, authors say . they lack direct access to characters, which can be difficult to generalize to new languages . |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to test the orthographic knowledge of Large Language Models . they find that most LLMs seem to know the spelling of their tokens - yet fail to manipulate text . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark tests the orthographic knowledge of large language models . it finds that most LLMs seem to know the spelling of their tokens, but fail to manipulate text . |
AlignBench: Benchmarking Chinese Alignment of Large Language Models (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Xiao Liu, Xuanyu Lei, Shengyuan Wang, Yue Huang, Andrew Feng, Bosi Wen, Jiale Cheng, Pei Ke, Yifan Xu, Weng Lam Tam, Xiaohan Zhang, Lichao Sun, Xiaotao Gu, Hongning Wang, Jing Zhang, Minlie Huang, Yuxiao Dong, Jie Tang
| Challenge: | Effective evaluation of alignment for emerging Chinese LLMs is still significantly lacking, calling for real-scenario grounded, open-ended, challenging and automatic evaluations tailored for alignment. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-dimensional benchmark for evaluating LLMs’ alignment in Chinese with 8 main categories, 683 real-scenario rooted queries and corresponding human verified references. |
| Outcome: | The benchmark uses a human-in-the-loop data curation pipeline, 683 real-scenario rooted queries and human verified references. |
CHENGYU-BENCH: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Chinese Idiom Understanding and Use (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focus on narrow tasks such as multiple-choice cloze tests, isolated translation, or simple paraphrasing. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to measure Chinese idioms' cultural and contextual nuances . they evaluate 2,937 human-verified examples covering 1,765 common idiomes . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks achieve 95% accuracy on Evaluative Connotation, but only 85% on Appropriateness and 40% top-1 accuracy in Open Cloze. |
From Remembering to Metacognition: Do Existing Benchmarks Accurately Evaluate LLMs? (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Geng Zhang, Yizhou Ying, Sihang Jiang, Jiaqing Liang, Guanglei Yue, Yifei Fu, Hailin Hu, Yanghua Xiao
| Challenge: | Existing benchmark datasets focus on low-level cognitive tasks while providing limited coverage of higher-level reasoning skills. |
| Approach: | They analyze the cognitive depth of popular LLM benchmarks using Bloom’s Taxonomy to evaluate both the cognitive and knowledge dimensions. |
| Outcome: | The results show that incorporating higher-level cognitive instructions into the current instruction fine-tuning process improves model performance. |
CMMLU: Measuring massive multitask language understanding in Chinese (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing large language models struggle to achieve an accuracy of even 60%, which is the pass mark for Chinese exams. |
| Approach: | They propose to use CMMLU to evaluate Chinese multilingual and Chinese LLMs in a comprehensive benchmark that covers various subjects and settings. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark covers natural sciences, social sciences, engineering, and the humanities and aims to improve on existing models. |
OpenEval: Benchmarking Chinese LLMs across Capability, Alignment and Safety (2024.acl-demos)
Copied to clipboard
Chuang Liu, Linhao Yu, Jiaxuan Li, Renren Jin, Yufei Huang, Ling Shi, Junhui Zhang, Xinmeng Ji, Tingting Cui, Liutao Liutao, Jinwang Song, Hongying Zan, Sun Li, Deyi Xiong
| Challenge: | a rapid development of Chinese large language models poses big challenges for efficient LLM evaluation. |
| Approach: | They propose an evaluation testbed that benchmarks Chinese LLMs across capability, alignment and safety. |
| Outcome: | The evaluation platform OpenEval benchmarks Chinese LLMs across capability, alignment and safety. |
VMLU Benchmarks: A comprehensive benchmark toolkit for Vietnamese LLMs (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Cuc Thi Bui, Nguyen Truong Son, Truong Van Trang, Lam Viet Phung, Pham Nhut Huy, Hoang Anh Le, Quoc Huu Van, Phong Nguyen-Thuan Do, Van Le Tran Truc, Duc Thanh Chau, Le-Minh Nguyen
| Challenge: | The evolution of Large Language Models (LLMs) has underscored the need for benchmarks designed for various languages and cultural contexts. |
| Approach: | They propose to use Vietnamese multitask language understanding (VMLU) benchmarks to assess different capabilities of LLMs, including general knowledge, reading comprehension, reasoning, and conversational skills. |
| Outcome: | The VMLU Benchmarks assess LLMs' general knowledge, reading comprehension, reasoning, and conversational skills. |
FB-Bench: A Fine-Grained Multi-Task Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs’ Responsiveness to Human Feedback (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing research focuses on benchmarking LLMs in single-turn dialogues, neglecting the nuanced nature of human feedback within real-world usage scenarios. |
| Approach: | They propose a fine-grained, multi-task benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs’ responsiveness to human feedback under real-world usage scenarios in Chinese. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that human feedback can significantly impact LLMs’ responsiveness in real-world usage scenarios. |
LawBench: Benchmarking Legal Knowledge of Large Language Models (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Zhiwei Fei, Xiaoyu Shen, Dawei Zhu, Fengzhe Zhou, Zhuo Han, Alan Huang, Songyang Zhang, Kai Chen, Zhixin Yin, Zongwen Shen, Jidong Ge, Vincent Ng
| Challenge: | LegalBench evaluated 20 LLMs in 162 legal tasks in 20 countries and jurisdictions. |
| Approach: | They present a comprehensive evaluation of 21 popular Large Language Models and the first comparative analysis of the empirical results. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks are based on the Bloom’s cognitive taxonomy and are compared to 21 popular LLMs. |