Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) perform well on a wide variety of tasks, authors say . they lack direct access to characters, which can be difficult to generalize to new languages .
Approach: They propose a benchmark to test the orthographic knowledge of Large Language Models . they find that most LLMs seem to know the spelling of their tokens - yet fail to manipulate text .
Outcome: The proposed benchmark tests the orthographic knowledge of large language models . it finds that most LLMs seem to know the spelling of their tokens, but fail to manipulate text .

Similar Papers

EXECUTE: A Multilingual Benchmark for LLM Token Understanding (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: EXECUTE is an expandable X(Cross)-Lingual Extension of CUTE that can be expanded to any language.
Approach: They extend the CUTE benchmark to more languages with diverse scripts and writing systems, introducing EXECUTE.
Outcome: The extended framework allows expansion to any language.
Spelling-out is not Straightforward: LLMs’ Capability of Tokenization from Token to Characters (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) can spell out tokens character by character with high accuracy, yet struggle with more complex character-level tasks.
Approach: They examine how large language models internally represent character-level information during the spelling-out process.
Outcome: The embedding layer does not fully encode character-level information, especially beyond the first character.
SubTokenTest: A Practical Benchmark for Real-World Sub-token Understanding (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing benchmarks have highlighted character-level tasks as lacking practical relevance . many real-world applications rely heavily on precise sub-token understanding .
Approach: They propose a benchmark that assesses sub-token understanding through practical tasks . they examine the impact of test-time scaling on sub-word reasoning .
Outcome: The proposed benchmark assesses sub-token understanding through practical tasks . it includes ten tasks across four domains and isolates tokenization-related failures .
Do LLMs Understand Social Knowledge? Evaluating the Sociability of Large Language Models with SocKET Benchmark (2023.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing benchmarks of social language are lacking for large language models.
Approach: They propose a new benchmark that measures how well large language models understand social language by grouping 58 tasks into five categories: humor & sarcasm, offensiveness, sentiment & emotion, and trustworthiness.
Outcome: The proposed model performs well at 58 tasks that are divided into five categories: humor & sarcasm, offensiveness, sentiment & emotion, and trustworthiness.
Phun-Bench: Evaluating LLMs on Phonological Understanding in Chinese (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing benchmarks on LLMs’ phonological abilities are either solvable through rote memorization or intertwined with other abilities, making them inadequate to measure LLM’s genuine ability in *phonological understanding*.
Approach: They propose to use a Chinese benchmark to evaluate LLMs' phonological understanding to test their ability to recall correct pronunciations.
Outcome: The proposed benchmarks show that LLMs excel at recalling correct pronunciations, but struggle to leverage phonological knowledge in the flexible and intuitive way that human speakers do.
Benchmarking Chinese Commonsense Reasoning of LLMs: From Chinese-Specifics to Reasoning-Memorization Correlations (2024.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Currently, many benchmarks evaluate the commonsense reasoning of large language models (LLMs), but most are English-based, limiting non-English evaluations.
Approach: They propose to use Chinese commonsense reasoning to evaluate LLMs' commonsensing ability.
Outcome: The proposed benchmark covers both globally known and Chinese-specific commonsense reasoning abilities and can be used as a reference for future research.
From Remembering to Metacognition: Do Existing Benchmarks Accurately Evaluate LLMs? (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing benchmark datasets focus on low-level cognitive tasks while providing limited coverage of higher-level reasoning skills.
Approach: They analyze the cognitive depth of popular LLM benchmarks using Bloom’s Taxonomy to evaluate both the cognitive and knowledge dimensions.
Outcome: The results show that incorporating higher-level cognitive instructions into the current instruction fine-tuning process improves model performance.
LLMs Know More About Numbers than They Can Say (2026.eacl-short)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in mathematical, scientific, financial and engineering domains.
Approach: They probe the hidden states of several smaller open-source LLMs to find out how big they are .
Outcome: The proposed model improves verbalized accuracy by 3.22% over base models.
Pun Unintended: LLMs and the Illusion of Humor Understanding (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing models for pun detection lack nuanced grasp typical of human interpretation.
Approach: They analyze existing pun detection benchmarks and human evaluation across recent LLMs to find subtle changes in puns that mislead LLM.
Outcome: The proposed models lack the nuance typical of human interpretation and lack the depth of their analysis to detect puns.
What do tokens know about their characters and how do they know it? (2022.naacl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Pre-trained language models that use subword tokenization schemes can succeed at a variety of language tasks that require character-level information.
Approach: They propose to use word tokenization schemes to probe what word pieces encode . they show that larger models can encode character-level information .
Outcome: The proposed models can encode character-level information and perform better on non-Latin alphabets.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations