Challenge: Recent studies have shown that LLMs exhibit social biases inherited from training data.
Approach: They propose a framework for evaluation and mitigation of bias in Large Language Models applied to complex clinical cases using a dataset based on the JAMA Clinical Challenge.
Outcome: The proposed framework employs multiple choice questions and explanations to evaluate gender and ethnicity biases in LLMs.

Similar Papers

Unveiling Performance Challenges of Large Language Models in Low-Resource Healthcare: A Demographic Fairness Perspective (2025.coling-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing large language models (LLMs) are not effective in solving real-world healthcare tasks, but they are able to provide demographic information and provide biased health predictions.
Approach: They evaluate state-of-the-art LLMs with three prevalent learning frameworks across six diverse healthcare tasks and find significant challenges in applying LLM to real-world healthcare tasks.
Outcome: The proposed models perform poorly in real-world healthcare tasks and are inconsistent with existing learning frameworks.
Building Trust in Clinical LLMs: Bias Analysis and Dataset Transparency (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Current dataset curation and bias assessment practices lack transparency . current approaches lack a thorough understanding of how data characteristics influence model behavior .
Approach: They propose a comprehensive bias evaluation framework that integrates general benchmarks with a healthcare-specific methodology to probe for biases in a sensitive healthcare context.
Outcome: The proposed approach to bias evaluation leverages established benchmarks and a healthcare-specific methodology.
Can LLMs Replace Clinical Doctors? Exploring Bias in Disease Diagnosis by Large Language Models (2024.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a new study examines the bias of disease prediction in large language models . the model biases are prevalent across gender, age range and disease judgment behaviors .
Approach: They propose a prompt-based approach to alleviate the bias in disease prediction with LLMs.
Outcome: The proposed model alleviates the observed bias in disease prediction with LLMs.
Investigating Gender Stereotypes in Large Language Models via Social Determinants of Health (2026.findings-eacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing benchmarks evaluate biases related to individual social determinants of health (SDoH) but they overlook interactions between these factors and lack context-specific assessments.
Approach: They investigated the relationship between gender and other SDoH in french patient records to determine whether LLMs rely on embedded stereotypes to make gendered decisions.
Outcome: The proposed models can probe stereotypes and make gendered decisions based on the data.
Addressing Healthcare-related Racial and LGBTQ+ Biases in Pretrained Language Models (2024.findings-naacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Pretrained language models (PLMs) propagate social stigmas and stereotypes, a critical concern given their widespread use.
Approach: They adapt two intrinsic bias benchmarks to quantify racial and LGBTQ+ biases in prevalent PLMs and empirically evaluate the effectiveness of various debiasing methods in mitigating these biase.
Outcome: The proposed methods reduce biases without compromising performance in downstream tasks.
Large Language Models Are Still Misled by Simple Bias Ensembles (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing benchmarks for large language models are constrained to datasets where each sample is manually injected with only one type of bias.
Approach: They propose a multi-bias benchmark where each sample contains multiple types of biases.
Outcome: The proposed benchmark shows that existing LLMs and debiasing methods perform poorly on this benchmark, highlighting the challenge of eliminating compounded biases.
Understanding Large Language Model Vulnerabilities to Social Bias Attacks (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable linguistic capabilities across tasks . however, there is a growing concern about their potential to perpetuate social biases .
Approach: They evaluate LLMs across gender, racial, and religious bias types . they also explore cross-bias and multiple-biases attacks .
Outcome: The proposed models are more susceptible to gender bias attacks than racial or religious biases.
7 Points to Tsinghua but 10 Points to ? Assessing Large Language Models in Agentic Multilingual National Bias (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models have garnered significant attention for their capabilities in multilingual natural language processing, but studies on risks associated with cross biases are limited to immediate context preferences.
Approach: They investigate multilingual bias in state-of-the-art Large Language Models by analyzing their responses to decision-making tasks across multiple languages.
Outcome: The proposed model can provide personalized advice across university applications, travel, and relocation scenarios.
Uncovering Bias in Large Vision-Language Models at Scale with Counterfactuals (2025.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have been proposed to augment LLMs with visual inputs.
Approach: They propose large vision-Language Models to augment LLMs with visual inputs.
Outcome: The proposed models condition generated text on both an input image and a visual prompt, enabling a variety of use cases such as visual question answering and multimodal chat.
Neutral Is Not Unbiased: Evaluating Implicit and Intersectional Identity Bias in LLMs Through Structured Narrative Scenarios (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models often reproduce societal biases, yet most evaluations overlook how such biase evolve across nuanced contexts or intersecting identities.
Approach: They propose a scenario-based evaluation framework built on 100 narrative tasks . they use critical discourse analysis and quantitative linguistic metrics to analyze LLMs .
Outcome: The proposed evaluation framework provides ethically coherent and socially plausible settings for probing model behavior.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations