Understanding Large Language Model Vulnerabilities to Social Bias Attacks (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable linguistic capabilities across tasks . however, there is a growing concern about their potential to perpetuate social biases . |
| Approach: | They evaluate LLMs across gender, racial, and religious bias types . they also explore cross-bias and multiple-biases attacks . |
| Outcome: | The proposed models are more susceptible to gender bias attacks than racial or religious biases. |
Similar Papers
Vulnerabilities of Large Language Models to Adversarial Attacks (2024.acl-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | This tutorial focuses on the vulnerabilities of Large Language Models to adversarial attacks . the tutorial lays the foundation by explaining safety-aligned models and concepts in cybersecurity . |
| Approach: | This tutorial lays the foundation by explaining safety-aligned LLMs and concepts in cybersecurity. |
| Outcome: | The tutorial lays the foundation by explaining safety-aligned models and concepts in cybersecurity. |
Characterizing Selective Refusal Bias in Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a recent study shows that safety guardrails in large language models can inadvertently introduce or reflect new biases as they may refuse to generate harmful content targeting some demographic groups and not others. |
| Approach: | They examine the selective refusal bias in large language models by examining demographics and responses. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model fails to defend against an indirect attack on previously refused groups in 89% of the trials. |
Social Bias Evaluation for Large Language Models Requires Prompt Variations (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have tried to evaluate and mitigate social biases accurately using limited prompts. |
| Approach: | They investigate the sensitivity of Large Language Models when changing prompt variations . they found that LLM rankings fluctuate across prompts for both task performance and social bias . |
| Outcome: | The results show that LLM rankings fluctuate when changing prompt variations . |
How Susceptible are Large Language Models to Ideological Manipulation? (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have the potential to exert substantial influence on public perceptions and interactions with information. |
| Approach: | They examine how LLMs can learn and generalize ideological biases from their instruction-tuning data. |
| Outcome: | The LLMs show a startling ability to absorb ideology from one topic and generalize it to even unrelated ones. |
A Comprehensive Study of Jailbreak Attack versus Defense for Large Language Models (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated capabilities for generating content that could be deemed harmful. |
| Approach: | They conduct a comprehensive analysis of existing studies on jailbreaking LLMs and their defense techniques. |
| Outcome: | The proposed techniques underperform existing white-box attacks and include special tokens significantly affects the likelihood of successful attacks. |
Uncovering Bias in Large Vision-Language Models at Scale with Counterfactuals (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have been proposed to augment LLMs with visual inputs. |
| Approach: | They propose large vision-Language Models to augment LLMs with visual inputs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models condition generated text on both an input image and a visual prompt, enabling a variety of use cases such as visual question answering and multimodal chat. |
Safety of Large Language Models Beyond English: A Systematic Literature Review of Risks, Biases, and Safeguards (2026.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have a growing number of applications that generate harmful, biased, or unsafe content. |
| Approach: | They synthesize findings from recent studies that evaluate their robustness across languages . they highlight gaps in multilingual safety research and recommend future work . |
| Outcome: | The systematic review examines the multilingual safety of large language models in English . it identifies challenges such as dataset availability and evaluation biases . |
Evaluating Implicit Bias in Large Language Models by Attacking From a Psychometric Perspective (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies have shown that large language models (LLMs) can elicit implicit biases that hurt certain demographics without explicit harmful words. |
| Approach: | They propose three attack approaches to elicit agreements to biased viewpoints from LLMs from a psychometric perspective and built two benchmarks to compare them. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods elicit agreements to biased viewpoints more effectively than baselines. |
Combating Security and Privacy Issues in the Era of Large Language Models (2024.naacl-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a tutorial aims to provide a summary of risks and vulnerabilities in large language models . a number of studies have focused on security, privacy and copyright aspects of LLMs . |
| Approach: | This tutorial seeks to provide a systematic summary of risks and vulnerabilities in large language models . authors will discuss security, privacy and copyright aspects of LLMs . |
| Outcome: | This tutorial aims to provide a systematic summary of risks and vulnerabilities in large language models . it will also outline emerging challenges in security, privacy and reliability of LLMs . |
Probing LLMs for hate speech detection: strengths and vulnerabilities (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent efforts to detect hateful or toxic language using large language models have not used explanation, additional context and victim community information in the detection process. |
| Approach: | They use different prompt variations, input information and victim community information to evaluate large language models in zero shot setting without adding any in-context examples. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models perform significantly better when included in the pipeline than baseline models. |