| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have made it easier for all to produce harmful, toxic, faked or forged content. |
| Approach: | They propose to use large language models to automatically discriminate from human-written texts by comparing their probability distributions over a document to see if they can detect forged or harmful content. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach harnesses each model’s capabilities, leading to strong detection performance on a variety of domains. |
Similar Papers
From Text to Source: Results in Detecting Large Language Model-Generated Content (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) generate human-like text, but have ethical and misuse concerns. |
| Approach: | They evaluate whether a classifier trained to distinguish between source and target LLMs can detect text from an LLM without further training. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method detects text from target LLMs without further training. |
LLM-DetectAIve: a Tool for Fine-Grained Machine-Generated Text Detection (2024.emnlp-demo)
Copied to clipboard
Mervat Abassy, Kareem Elozeiri, Alexander Aziz, Minh Ta, Raj Tomar, Bimarsha Adhikari, Saad Ahmed, Yuxia Wang, Osama Mohammed Afzal, Zhuohan Xie, Jonibek Mansurov, Ekaterina Artemova, Vladislav Mikhailov, Rui Xing, Jiahui Geng, Hasan Iqbal, Zain Mujahid, Tarek Mahmoud, Akim Tsvigun, Alham Aji, Artem Shelmanov, Nizar Habash, Iryna Gurevych, Preslav Nakov
| Challenge: | a large number of machine-generated texts are often hard to distinguish between human-written and machine-generated text . this raises concerns about potential misuse, especially within educational and academic domains . |
| Approach: | They propose a system that can detect whether a text is human-written or machine-generated . they use a fine-grained classification schema to identify the use of machine-generated text . |
| Outcome: | The proposed system can distinguish between human-written and machine-generated text . it can detect attempts to obfuscate the fact that a text was machine- generated . |
MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the Wild (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yafu Li, Qintong Li, Leyang Cui, Wei Bi, Zhilin Wang, Longyue Wang, Linyi Yang, Shuming Shi, Yue Zhang
| Challenge: | Existing research has focused on evaluating detection methods for specific domains or language models. |
| Approach: | They build a testbed to detect texts from diverse human writings and LLMs using different detection methods. |
| Outcome: | Empirical results show that the top performing detector can identify 84.12% out-of-domain texts generated by a new LLM, indicating the feasibility for application scenarios. |
Why Generate When You Can Discriminate? A Novel Technique for Text Classification using Language Models (2024.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for text classification using autoregressive language models are limited . authors propose a novel technique for text classification using autoreregressives . |
| Approach: | They propose a two-step technique for text classification using autoregressive language models . they use a set of perplexity and log-likelihood based numeric features to elicit a text instance . |
| Outcome: | The proposed technique eliminates parameter updates in LMs and does not limit training examples . it is evaluated across 5 datasets and compares with multiple competent baselines . |
PlagBench: Exploring the Duality of Large Language Models in Plagiarism Generation and Detection (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have raised concerns about the potential threats large language models pose to academic integrity and copyright protection. |
| Approach: | They propose a dataset of 46.5K synthetic text pairs that represent three major types of plagiarism: verbatim copying, paraphrasing, and summarization. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset shows that GPT-3.5 Turbo can produce high-quality paraphrases and summaries without significantly increasing text complexity compared to GPT-4 Turbo. |
M4: Multi-generator, Multi-domain, and Multi-lingual Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detection (2024.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yuxia Wang, Jonibek Mansurov, Petar Ivanov, Jinyan Su, Artem Shelmanov, Akim Tsvigun, Chenxi Whitehouse, Osama Mohammed Afzal, Tarek Mahmoud, Toru Sasaki, Thomas Arnold, Alham Aji, Nizar Habash, Iryna Gurevych, Preslav Nakov
| Challenge: | Large language models generate fluent responses to user queries, but they are also susceptible to misuse in journalism, education, and academia. |
| Approach: | They propose a large-scale benchmark for machine-generated text detection that is a multi-generator, multi-domain, and multi-lingual corpus. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system can detect machine-generated text and pinpoint misuse . the proposed system is based on a large-scale benchmark dataset . |
A Survey on Detection of LLMs-Generated Content (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Xianjun Yang, Liangming Pan, Xuandong Zhao, Haifeng Chen, Linda Petzold, William Yang Wang, Wei Cheng
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models have led to an increase in synthetic content generation . the ability to detect LLMs-generated content has become of paramount importance . |
| Approach: | They propose to provide a detailed overview of existing detection strategies and benchmarks, scrutinizing their differences and advocating for more adaptable and robust models to enhance detection accuracy. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model will be able to detect human-written content in real time. |
Humanizing Machine-Generated Content: Evading AI-Text Detection through Adversarial Attack (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Despite the development of large language models, there are still significant challenges in detecting whether text is generated by a machine. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for a broader class of adversarial attacks to perform minor perturbations in machine-generated content to evade detection. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework can be compromised in as little as 10 seconds, and improves over iterative adversarial learning. |
Increasing Diversity While Maintaining Accuracy: Text Data Generation with Large Language Models and Human Interventions (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) can be used to generate text data for training and evaluating other models. |
| Approach: | They propose to use logit suppression and temperature sampling to diversify text generation but at the cost of data accuracy. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach can increase diversity but at the cost of data accuracy. |
LLMDet: A Third Party Large Language Models Generated Text Detection Tool (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing detection tools rely on access to LLMs and can only distinguish between machine-generated and human-authored text. |
| Approach: | They propose a model-specific, secure, efficient, and extendable detection tool that can source text from specific LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed tool can source text from specific LLMs, such as GPT-2, OPT, LLaMA, and others. |