Is Cognition Consistent with Perception? Assessing and Mitigating Multimodal Knowledge Conflicts in Document Understanding (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown impressive capabilities in document understanding due to different types of annotation noise in training. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to reduce C&P knowledge conflicts across all tested MLLMs . they propose to use annotation noise to train models to understand document content . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method reduces C&P knowledge conflicts across all tested MLLMs and enhances their performance in both cognitive and perceptual tasks. |
Similar Papers
Insight Over Sight: Exploring the Vision-Knowledge Conflicts in Multimodal LLMs (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to mitigating vision-knowledge conflict in Large Language Models (MLLMs) are not effective and can be further scaled. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to generate inputs to simulate and evaluate vision-knowledge conflict in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) using original images and 1,122 high-quality question-answer pairs, they propose 'a diagnostic benchmark' |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework, benchmark, and analysis contribute to the understanding and mitigation of vision-knowledge conflicts in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). |
Exploring and Evaluating Multimodal Knowledge Reasoning Consistency of Multimodal Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | MLLMs have achieved significant breakthroughs in understanding across text and vision, but current models still face inconsistencies in reasoning outcomes. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate multimodal large language models using a multimodal knowledge reasoning dataset to examine the extent of consistency degradation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation tasks show that MLLMs are inefficient at integrating knowledge across modalities . |
Multimodal Inconsistency Reasoning (MMIR): A New Benchmark for Multimodal Reasoning Models (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are predominantly trained on consistent visual-textual inputs, leaving open the question of whether they can handle semantic mismatches in layout-rich content. |
| Approach: | They propose to use multimodal inconsistency reasoning to assess MLLMs' ability to reason about semantic mismatches in webpages, presentation slides, and posters. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms open-source models in detecting inconsistencies in webpages, presentation slides, and posters while remaining vulnerable to inconsistent errors. |
Assessing and Mitigating Medical Knowledge Drift and Conflicts in Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Rapid medical concept drift can lead LLMs to provide incorrect or outdated advice. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate how large language models manage knowledge conflicts in clinical guidelines. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates how LLMs manage varied knowledge conflicts in clinical guidelines. |
EmoMM: Benchmarking and Steering MLLM for Multimodal Emotion Recognition under Conflict and Missingness (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown promise in MER, but their internal decision-making mechanisms under modality conflict and missingness remain underexplored. |
| Approach: | They propose a multimodal large language model that can detect and control modality conflicts and missing subsets by a lightweight mechanism that detects and controls modality conflict. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves performance across settings, showing it can handle conflict and missing behaviors. |
Unveiling Uncertainty: A Deep Dive into Calibration and Performance of Multimodal Large Language Models (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multimodal large language models combine visual and textual data for tasks like image captioning and visual question answering. |
| Approach: | They propose temperature scaling and iterative prompt optimization to calibrate MLLMs and enhance model reliability. |
| Outcome: | The proposed techniques improve MLLMs and improve model reliability. |
Multimodal Causal Reasoning Benchmark: Challenging Multimodal Large Language Models to Discern Causal Links Across Modalities (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing MLLMs lack robustness in multimodal causal reasoning compared to their performance in textual settings. |
| Approach: | They propose a novel multimodal chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning benchmark that leverages siamese images and text pairs to challenge MLLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark leverages siamese images and text pairs to challenge MLLMs. |
Do You See Me : A Multidimensional Benchmark for Evaluating Visual Perception in Multimodal LLMs (2026.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) show reasoning promise, yet their visual perception is a bottleneck. |
| Approach: | They propose a visual perception benchmark to test the visual perception of MLLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark examines MLLMs' visual perception abilities with 1758 images and 2612 questions. |
Quantifying and Mitigating Unimodal Biases in Multimodal Large Language Models: A Causal Perspective (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Large Language Models have facilitated the development of Multimodal LLMs. |
| Approach: | They propose a causal framework to interpret unimodal biases in visual question answering problems and a framework to integrate information from different modalities and mitigate biase. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework analyzes visual question answering (VQA) problems to assess their impact on predictions. |
Probing Audio-Visual Reasoning in Multimodal Language Models through the Lens of Audio (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Kaixiong Gong, Kaituo Feng, Bohao Li, Yibing Wang, Mofan Cheng, Shijia Yang, Jiaming Han, Benyou Wang, Yutong Bai, Zhuoran Yang, Xiangyu Yue
| Challenge: | Recent multimodal large language models lack robust audio-visual integration ability and performance on DeafTest is highly correlated with AV-Odyssey accuracy. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmarking tool that integrates audio-visual reasoning with audio-video cues to infer solutions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs well on DeafTest, but lacks audio perception in simple audio tasks. |