Global MMLU: Understanding and Addressing Cultural and Linguistic Biases in Multilingual Evaluation (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Shivalika Singh, Angelika Romanou, Clémentine Fourrier, David Ifeoluwa Adelani, Jian Gang Ngui, Daniel Vila-Suero, Peerat Limkonchotiwat, Kelly Marchisio, Wei Qi Leong, Yosephine Susanto, Raymond Ng, Shayne Longpre, Sebastian Ruder, Wei-Yin Ko, Antoine Bosselut, Alice Oh, Andre Martins, Leshem Choshen, Daphne Ippolito, Enzo Ferrante, Marzieh Fadaee, Beyza Ermis, Sara Hooker
| Challenge: | Reliable multilingual evaluation is difficult and culturally appropriate evaluation is even harder to achieve. |
| Approach: | They propose a multilingual evaluation framework that aims to mitigate these biases by improving translations and annotation practices. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves translation quality and cultural coverage and is culturally sensitive and culturally agnostic. |
Similar Papers
Social Bias in Multilingual Language Models: A Survey (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Pretrained multilingual models exhibit the same social bias as models processing English texts. |
| Approach: | They examine the literature on bias evaluation and mitigation approaches in multilingual and non-English contexts and identify gaps in the field. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models perform well on multilingual language understanding benchmarks and are consistent with the current literature. |
MMLU-ProX: A Multilingual Benchmark for Advanced Large Language Model Evaluation (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Weihao Xuan, Rui Yang, Heli Qi, Qingcheng Zeng, Yunze Xiao, Aosong Feng, Dairui Liu, Yun Xing, Junjue Wang, Fan Gao, Jinghui Lu, Yuang Jiang, Huitao Li, Xin Li, Kunyu Yu, Ruihai Dong, Shangding Gu, Yuekang Li, Xiaofei Xie, Felix Juefei-Xu, Foutse Khomh, Osamu Yoshie, Qingyu Chen, Douglas Teodoro, Nan Liu, Randy Goebel, Lei Ma, Edison Marrese-Taylor, Shijian Lu, Yusuke Iwasawa, Yutaka Matsuo, Irene Li
| Challenge: | Existing large language model evaluation benchmarks focus on English, while current multilingual tasks lack parallel questions that specifically assess cross-lingual reasoning abilities. |
| Approach: | They propose a comprehensive benchmark covering 29 languages, built on an English benchmark. |
| Outcome: | The MMLU-ProX is a comprehensive benchmark covering 29 languages, built on an English benchmark. |
Your Stereotypical Mileage May Vary: Practical Challenges of Evaluating Biases in Multiple Languages and Cultural Contexts (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
Karen Fort, Laura Alonso Alemany, Luciana Benotti, Julien Bezançon, Claudia Borg, Marthese Borg, Yongjian Chen, Fanny Ducel, Yoann Dupont, Guido Ivetta, Zhijian Li, Margot Mieskes, Marco Naguib, Yuyan Qian, Matteo Radaelli, Wolfgang S. Schmeisser-Nieto, Emma Raimundo Schulz, Thiziri Saci, Sarah Saidi, Javier Torroba Marchante, Shilin Xie, Sergio E. Zanotto, Aurélie Névéol
| Challenge: | Recent studies have identified a gap in the availability of tools and resources to study bias in languages other than English and social contexts outside the north of America. |
| Approach: | They use stereotypes to build a corpus of sentence pairs that cover biases in seven cultural contexts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed resource covers a wide range of languages and cultural settings . it favors sentences that express stereotypes in most bias categories . |
Are Large Language Model-based Evaluators the Solution to Scaling Up Multilingual Evaluation? (2024.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
Rishav Hada, Varun Gumma, Adrian Wynter, Harshita Diddee, Mohamed Ahmed, Monojit Choudhury, Kalika Bali, Sunayana Sitaram
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in various tasks, but their evaluation, especially in languages beyond the top 20, remains inadequate due to existing benchmarks and metrics limitations. |
| Approach: | They propose to use Large Language Models as evaluators to rank or score other models’ outputs by calibrating them against 20K human judgments across three text-generation tasks, five metrics, and eight languages. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation methods can be used to improve multilingual evaluation by calibrating them against 20K human judgments across three text-generation tasks, five metrics, and eight languages. |
On Evaluating and Mitigating Gender Biases in Multilingual Settings (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks and resources for evaluating gender biases in multilingual settings are limited. |
| Approach: | They propose to extend DisCo to different Indian languages using human annotations to evaluate gender biases in multilingual models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks and mitigation techniques are extended beyond English to evaluate gender biases in multilingual models. |
Multi-lingual Functional Evaluation for Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multilingual competence in large language models is often evaluated via static data benchmarks such as Belebele, M-MMLU and M-GSM. |
| Approach: | They extend existing functional benchmark templates from English to five additional languages that span the range of resources available for NLP: French, Spanish, Hindi, Arabic and Yoruba. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models are translated from English to French, Spanish, Hindi, Arabic and Yoruba. |
A Benchmark for Translations Across Styles and Language Variants (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | lack of comprehensive evaluation benchmarks has hindered progress in this field . lack of evaluation benchmarking has hinder MT's ability to generate accurate outputs . |
| Approach: | They evaluate translations across semantic preservation, cultural and regional specificity, expression style, and fluency at both the word and sentence levels. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation framework is validated on translations of state-of-the-art large language models . |
Global Voices, Local Biases: Socio-Cultural Prejudices across Languages (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on human biases are heavily skewed towards Western and European languages . despite growing interest in language models, there are several shortcomings in the literature . |
| Approach: | They scale the Word Embedding Association Test to 24 languages and add culturally relevant information for each language. |
| Outcome: | The proposed language models can reflect and often amplify the effects of bias across linguistic, cultural, and societal borders. |
BenchMAX: A Comprehensive Multilingual Evaluation Suite for Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing multilingual benchmarks focus primarily on language understanding tasks. |
| Approach: | They develop a multi-way multilingual benchmark that measures critical capabilities of large language models across languages. |
| Outcome: | Extensive experiments on BenchMAX reveal uneven utilization of core capabilities across languages, emphasizing the performance gaps that scaling model size alone does not resolve. |
MAKIEval: A Multilingual Automatic WiKidata-based Framework for Cultural Awareness Evaluation for LLMs (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are used globally across many languages, but their English-centric pretraining raises concerns about cross-lingual disparities for cultural awareness . |
| Approach: | They introduce an automatic multilingual framework for evaluating cultural awareness in large language models across languages, regions, and topics. |
| Outcome: | The framework evaluates open-ended text generation, capturing how models express culturally grounded knowledge in natural language. |