Beyond One-Size-Fits-All: Tailored Benchmarks for Efficient Evaluation (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Peiwen Yuan, Yueqi Zhang, Shaoxiong Feng, Yiwei Li, Xinglin Wang, Jiayi Shi, Chuyi Tan, Boyuan Pan, Yao Hu, Kan Li
| Challenge: | Existing efficient methods estimate performance of models on large benchmarks, but these methods rely on the assumption that target models have high prediction consistency with source models. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that conducts customized evaluation tailored to each target model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method reduces the MAE of estimates by 31.4% on benchmarks across 300 models. |
Similar Papers
ONEBench to Test Them All: Sample-Level Benchmarking Over Open-Ended Capabilities (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | ONEBench enables custom benchmarks for specific capabilities while reusing and aggregating samples. |
| Approach: | They propose a new paradigm that consolidates individual evaluation datasets into a unified, ever-expanding sample pool. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model evaluation framework is based on dynamic, sample-level evaluation. |
LLMeBench: A Flexible Framework for Accelerating LLMs Benchmarking (2024.eacl-demo)
Copied to clipboard
Fahim Dalvi, Maram Hasanain, Sabri Boughorbel, Basel Mousi, Samir Abdaljalil, Nizi Nazar, Ahmed Abdelali, Shammur Absar Chowdhury, Hamdy Mubarak, Ahmed Ali
| Challenge: | Recent development and success of Large Language Models necessitate evaluation of their performance across diverse NLP tasks in different languages. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that can be customized to evaluate LLMs for any NLP task, regardless of language. |
| Outcome: | The LLMeBench framework can be customized to evaluate LLMs for any NLP task, regardless of language. |
Benchmark Profiling: Mechanistic Diagnosis of LLM Benchmarks (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models are often judged by their scores on standard benchmarks, yet such scores often overstate real capability since they mask the mix of skills a task actually demands. |
| Approach: | They propose a diagnostic framework that decomposes benchmark performance into ten cognitively grounded abilities and computes an Ability Impact Score (AIS) AIS quantifies how much each ability contributes to a model’s success on a given benchmark. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework decomposes performance into ten cognitively grounded abilities and computes an Ability Impact Score (AIS) that quantifies how much each ability contributes to a model’s success on a given benchmark. |
RubricBench: Aligning Model-Generated Rubrics with Human Standards (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Junyi Zhou, Qiyuan Zhang, Yufei Wang, Fuyuan Lyu, Yidong Ming, Can Xu, Qingfeng Sun, Kai Zheng, Peng Kang, Xue Liu, Chen Ma
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks lack discriminative complexity and ground-truth rubric annotations required for rigorous evaluation. |
| Approach: | They propose a curated benchmark with 1,147 pairwise comparisons to assess the reliability of rubric-based evaluation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that they support diverse domains, exhibit discriminative ability, provide high-quality annotations, and include human-authored rubrics. |
Reproducible and Efficient Benchmarks for Hyperparameter Optimization of Neural Machine Translation Systems (2020.tacl-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Optimal versus suboptimal hyperparameters can lead to dramatic swings in system performance. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a library of pre-trained models for fast, low cost HPO experimentation and to propose metrics for evaluating HPO methods on NMT. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method uses a library of pre-trained models for fast, low cost experimentation on neural machine translation (NMT) . |
VarBench: Robust Language Model Benchmarking Through Dynamic Variable Perturbation (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent benchmarks release only training and validation sets, keeping the test set labels closed-source. |
| Approach: | They propose to extract variables from each test case and define a value range for each variable. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves the accuracy of the evaluations on four datasets covering mathematical generation and multiple-choice tasks. |
Benchmarking Meta-embeddings: What Works and What Does Not (2021.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to build meta-embeddings have been evaluated using a variety of methods and datasets, which makes it difficult to draw meaningful conclusions regarding the merits of each approach. |
| Approach: | They propose a unified framework for a fair and objective meta-embedding evaluation using intrinsic and extrinsic tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing methods on intrinsic and extrinsic evaluation benchmarks and outperformed existing methods. |
AttributionBench: How Hard is Automatic Attribution Evaluation? (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | generative search engines enhance the reliability of large language model responses by providing cited evidence. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a benchmark to evaluate whether a large language model supports the generated responses or not . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark shows that even a fine-tuned GPT-3.5 only achieves around 80% macro-F1 under a binary classification formulation. |
WaterBench: Towards Holistic Evaluation of Watermarks for Large Language Models (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have developed watermarking algorithms which restrict the generation process to leave an invisible trace for watermark detection. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmarking procedure that compares different methods to ensure consistent watermarking strength and jointly evaluates their generation and detection performance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark compares 4 open-source watermarks on 2 LLMs under 2 watermarking strengths and observes the common struggles for current methods on maintaining the generation quality. |
GEMv2: Multilingual NLG Benchmarking in a Single Line of Code (2022.emnlp-demos)
Copied to clipboard
Sebastian Gehrmann, Abhik Bhattacharjee, Abinaya Mahendiran, Alex Wang, Alexandros Papangelis, Aman Madaan, Angelina Mcmillan-major, Anna Shvets, Ashish Upadhyay, Bernd Bohnet, Bingsheng Yao, Bryan Wilie, Chandra Bhagavatula, Chaobin You, Craig Thomson, Cristina Garbacea, Dakuo Wang, Daniel Deutsch, Deyi Xiong, Di Jin, Dimitra Gkatzia, Dragomir Radev, Elizabeth Clark, Esin Durmus, Faisal Ladhak, Filip Ginter, Genta Indra Winata, Hendrik Strobelt, Hiroaki Hayashi, Jekaterina Novikova, Jenna Kanerva, Jenny Chim, Jiawei Zhou, Jordan Clive, Joshua Maynez, João Sedoc, Juraj Juraska, Kaustubh Dhole, Khyathi Raghavi Chandu, Laura Perez Beltrachini, Leonardo F . R. Ribeiro, Lewis Tunstall, Li Zhang, Mahim Pushkarna, Mathias Creutz, Michael White, Mihir Sanjay Kale, Moussa Kamal Eddine, Nico Daheim, Nishant Subramani, Ondrej Dusek, Paul Pu Liang, Pawan Sasanka Ammanamanchi, Qi Zhu, Ratish Puduppully, Reno Kriz, Rifat Shahriyar, Ronald Cardenas, Saad Mahamood, Salomey Osei, Samuel Cahyawijaya, Sanja Štajner, Sebastien Montella, Shailza Jolly, Simon Mille, Tahmid Hasan, Tianhao Shen, Tosin Adewumi, Vikas Raunak, Vipul Raheja, Vitaly Nikolaev, Vivian Tsai, Yacine Jernite, Ying Xu, Yisi Sang, Yixin Liu, Yufang Hou
| Challenge: | Evaluations in machine learning rarely use the latest metrics, datasets, or human evaluation in favor of remaining compatible with prior work. |
| Approach: | They propose to use the Generation, Evaluation, and Metrics Benchmark to integrate new evaluation methods into existing evaluations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation infrastructure bridges the gap between the advantages of leaderboards and in-depth and evolving evaluations by allowing model developers to benefit from each other's work. |