Challenge: Existing formal languages such as Lean, Coq and Metamath are proving to be useful in formal theorem proving . however, there is a scarcity of high-quality supervised fine-tuning data for formal proofs .
Approach: They propose a Q**uality-**D**riven **T**heorem **S**ynthesis method in Lean4 . they propose diversity screening and the self-assessment method to select theoremas that exhibit diversity and high quality from the initial synthetic statements.
Outcome: The proposed method significantly improves performance of open-source LLMs in theorem proving tasks.

Similar Papers

TheoremLlama: Transforming General-Purpose LLMs into Lean4 Experts (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a framework for formal proof writing using formal languages like Lean4 is needed to prove mathematical theorems using formal language.
Approach: They propose a framework that trains a general-purpose LLM to be a Lean4 expert.
Outcome: The proposed framework achieves cumulative accuracies of 36.48% and 33.61% on MiniF2F-Valid and Test datasets.
Theorem Prover as a Judge for Synthetic Data Generation (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies show that large language models are increasingly capable of tackling mathematical problems.
Approach: They propose an approach that iteratively refines theorem prover formalisation to mitigate errors.
Outcome: The proposed method increases execution rate on the Lean prover from 60% to 87%, while human annotation is replaced with theorem prover feedback.
KodCode: A Diverse, Challenging, and Verifiable Synthetic Dataset for Coding (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing code-focused resources typically fail to ensure either the breadth of coverage or verifiable correctness.
Approach: They propose a synthetic dataset that provides high-quality, verifiable training data for Large Language Models for coding.
Outcome: The proposed dataset surpasses Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct and DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B in performance on coding benchmarks.
ResearchBench: Benchmarking LLMs in Scientific Discovery via Inspiration-Based Task Decomposition (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models have shown potential in assisting scientific research, yet their ability to discover high-quality research hypotheses remains unexamined due to the lack of a dedicated benchmark.
Approach: They propose a benchmark for evaluating large language models on a sufficient set of scientific discovery sub-tasks.
Outcome: The proposed framework extracts critical components from papers across 12 disciplines with expert validation confirming its accuracy.
LLM-Powered Benchmark Factory: Reliable, Generic, and Efficient (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Using generic and efficient benchmark generators, human annotators are limited by inefficiency . current benchmark generator methods rely on seed signals, leading to long cycles and high costs .
Approach: They propose a framework to evaluate LLMs as generic benchmark generators and integrate them as BenchMaker.
Outcome: The proposed framework achieves comparable performance to human-annotated benchmarks on most metrics.
ATG: Benchmarking Automated Theorem Generation for Generative Language Models (2024.findings-naacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing generative language models (LMs) can generate new or reusable theorems, but their ability to generate new theorels is under-explored.
Approach: They propose to use Metamath library to generate new theorems that can be saved as reusable knowledge for future theoretical proving.
Outcome: The proposed benchmark evaluates whether an agent can generate valuable (and possibly brand new) theorems that are applicable for downstream theoretic proving as reusable knowledge.
From Informal to Formal – Incorporating and Evaluating LLMs on Natural Language Requirements to Verifiable Formal Proofs (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies in formal mathematical reasoning have shown an unstoppable growth trend.
Approach: They constructed 18k high-quality instruction-response pairs across five mainstream formal specification languages and evaluated them against ten open-sourced LLMs.
Outcome: The proposed model compared instruction-response pairs across five formal specification languages and found that the LLMs were good at writing proof segments when given either the code, or the detailed description of proof steps.
LeanReasoner: Boosting Complex Logical Reasoning with Lean (2024.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) often struggle with complex logical reasoning due to logical inconsistencies and the inherent difficulty of such reasoning.
Approach: They propose a method that formalizes logical reasoning problems into theorems within Lean and then proves or disproving the corresponding theorels.
Outcome: The proposed method achieves state-of-the-art performance on the FOLIO dataset and near this level on ProofWriter.
QEFT: Quantization for Efficient Fine-Tuning of LLMs (2024.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods to optimize inference and fine-tuning for large language models have failed to improve all aspects of the process.
Approach: They propose a new technique that accelerates both inference and fine-tuning while using fewer resources.
Outcome: The proposed technique accelerates both inference and fine-tuning while using fewer resources.
Faithful and Robust LLM-Driven Theorem Proving for NLI Explanations (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent work has shown that the interaction of large language models (LLMs) with theorem provers (TPs) can help verify and improve the validity of NLI explanations.
Approach: They propose to use logical expressions to guide LLMs in generating structured proof sketches and to use them to improve their accuracy.
Outcome: The proposed strategies improve autoformalisation, syntactic errors and explanation refinement over the state-of-the-art model.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations