GeoEval: Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs and Multi-Modal Models on Geometry Problem-Solving (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) and multi-modal models (MMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in problem-solving, but their proficiency in tackling geometry math problems has not been thoroughly evaluated. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate the performance of large language models and multi-modal models in solving geometry math problems. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves 55.67% accuracy on main subset but only 6.00% accuracy on hard subset. |
Similar Papers
P-MMEval: A Parallel Multilingual Multitask Benchmark for Consistent Evaluation of LLMs (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Yidan Zhang, Yu Wan, Boyi Deng, Baosong Yang, Hao-Ran Wei, Fei Huang, Bowen Yu, Dayiheng Liu, Junyang Lin, Fei Huang, Jingren Zhou
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models showcase varied multilingual capabilities across tasks . previous assessments focused on fundamental natural language processing (NLP) or isolated capability-specific tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a multilingual multitask benchmark to assess multilingual capabilities . they use a large-scale benchmark covering fundamental and capability-specialized datasets . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark compares models and tasks across languages and tasks and examines knowledge transfer from English to other languages. |
GeoLaux: A Benchmark for Evaluating MLLMs’ Geometry Performance on Long-Step Problems Requiring Auxiliary Lines (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for Geometry problem solving lack fine-grained evaluation for long-step problems necessitating auxiliary line construction. |
| Approach: | They present a fine-grained annotated dataset with long-step reasoning and auxiliary line construction that provides a detailed evaluation of 23 leading MLLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs significantly worse on long-step problems than short-step ones, with 18 models showing a performance drop of over 50%. |
Beyond Lines and Circles: Unveiling the Geometric Reasoning Gap in Large Language Models (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate increasing proficiency in complex mathematical and algorithmic tasks, yet their geometric reasoning skills are underexplored. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that enhances LLMs’ reasoning potential through a multi-agent system conducting internal dialogue. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework enhances LLMs’ reasoning potential through a multi-agent system conducting internal dialogue. |
MathBench: Evaluating the Theory and Application Proficiency of LLMs with a Hierarchical Mathematics Benchmark (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Hongwei Liu, Zilong Zheng, Yuxuan Qiao, Haodong Duan, Zhiwei Fei, Fengzhe Zhou, Wenwei Zhang, Songyang Zhang, Dahua Lin, Kai Chen
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models have showcased significant improvements in mathematics, but traditional benchmarks like GSM8k offer a unidimensional perspective. |
| Approach: | MathBench is a benchmark that rigorously assesses the mathematical capabilities of large language models. |
| Outcome: | MathBench spans a wide range of mathematical disciplines, offering a detailed evaluation of both theoretical understanding and practical problem-solving skills. |
MMEvalPro: Calibrating Multimodal Benchmarks Towards Trustworthy and Efficient Evaluation (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Jinsheng Huang, Liang Chen, Taian Guo, Fu Zeng, Yusheng Zhao, Bohan Wu, Ye Yuan, Haozhe Zhao, Zhihui Guo, Yichi Zhang, Jingyang Yuan, Wei Ju, Luchen Liu, Tianyu Liu, Baobao Chang, Ming Zhang
| Challenge: | Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) exhibit impressive cross-modal understanding and reasoning abilities, but many benchmarks suffer from systematic biases. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to avoid Type-I errors by creating one perception question and one knowledge anchor question through a meticulous annotation process. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark avoids Type-I errors while maintaining reliability of MCQ evaluations. |
GraphEval36K: Benchmarking Coding and Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models on Graph Datasets (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant capabilities in processing and understanding text data. |
| Approach: | They propose a structure-based instruction-based method to enhance LLM performance on complex graph tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms open-source models on graph problem-solving, but the gap is narrowing. |
TableEval: A Real-World Benchmark for Complex, Multilingual, and Multi-Structured Table Question Answering (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing TableQA benchmarks focus on simple flat tables and suffer from data leakage . current benchmarks are monolingual and fail to capture cross-lingual variability . |
| Approach: | They propose a table-based TableQA benchmark to evaluate LLMs on real-world tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that they achieve high agreement with human judgment . the proposed framework improves on the alignment between model responses and reference answers . |
SMART: Evaluating LLMs’ Mathematical Reasoning via a Human Cognitive Process-Inspired Benchmark (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation methods focus on the final answer or on the intermediate reasoning steps, overlooking its inherently multi-stage and multi-dimensional nature. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark that decomposes mathematical problem-solving into four cognitive dimensions and introduces dimension-specific tasks to measure their cognitive processes. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model decomposes mathematical problem-solving into four cognitive dimensions and introduces dimension-specific tasks to measure their cognitive processes. |
PyraMathBench: Evaluating and Improving Mathematical Capability in Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Numerical reasoning is ubiquitous in scientific research and financial analysis, but few benchmarks evaluate them by integrating numerical processing and mathematical reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a numerically-integrated hierarchical benchmark with 27,215 questions derived from 7,404 math word problems that spans 4 key cognitive aspects, 14 subcategories, and 2 modalities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves Qwen-2.5 score with SOLVE and IRPO training. |
RealHiTBench: A Comprehensive Realistic Hierarchical Table Benchmark for Evaluating LLM-Based Table Analysis (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Pengzuo Wu, Yuhang Yang, Guangcheng Zhu, Chao Ye, Hong Gu, Xu Lu, Ruixuan Xiao, Bowen Bao, Yijing He, Liangyu Zha, Wentao Ye, Junbo Zhao, Haobo Wang
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for large language models focus on simple, flat table structures. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate the performance of both Large Language Models and Multimodal LLMs across a variety of input formats for complex tabular data, including LaTeX, HTML, and PNG. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates the performance of LLMs and Multimodal LLM models across a variety of input formats for complex tabular data, including LaTeX, HTML, and PNG. |