PUB: A Pragmatics Understanding Benchmark for Assessing LLMs’ Pragmatics Capabilities (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Pragmatics understanding is not well studied in LLMs, but their understanding of pragmatics is lacking. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a dataset to measure LLMs' understanding of pragmatics to evaluate their models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset includes 14 tasks in four pragmatics phenomena, namely; Implicature, Presupposition, Reference, and Deixis. |
Similar Papers
Pragmatics in the Era of Large Language Models: A Survey on Datasets, Evaluation, Opportunities and Challenges (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Bolei Ma, Yuting Li, Wei Zhou, Ziwei Gong, Yang Janet Liu, Katja Jasinskaja, Annemarie Friedrich, Julia Hirschberg, Frauke Kreuter, Barbara Plank
| Challenge: | linguistics studies how context influences meaning of language and how people use it to convey implied meanings, emotions, and intentions. |
| Approach: | They analyze task designs, data collection methods, evaluation approaches and their relevance to real-world applications. |
| Outcome: | The findings highlight emerging trends, challenges, and gaps in existing benchmarks . the findings will contribute to more nuanced and context-aware NLP models . |
HellaSwag-Pro: A Large-Scale Bilingual Benchmark for Evaluating the Robustness of LLMs in Commonsense Reasoning (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Xiaoyuan Li, Moxin Li, Rui Men, Yichang Zhang, Keqin Bao, Wenjie Wang, Fuli Feng, Dayiheng Liu, Junyang Lin
| Challenge: | Existing studies show that large language models are robust in commonsense reasoning . however, some variations in questions can lead to incorrect responses . |
| Approach: | They propose a large-scale bilingual benchmark consisting of 11,200 cases . they conduct extensive experiments on 41 representative LLMs . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark systematically evaluates the robustness of large language models in commonsense reasoning. |
Can LLMs Reason About Program Semantics? A Comprehensive Evaluation of LLMs on Formal Specification Inference (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being used to automate programming tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate LLMs' reasoning abilities on program semantics. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark shows that LLMs perform well with simple control flows but struggle with more complex structures, especially loops, even with advanced prompting. |
Do LLMs Understand Social Knowledge? Evaluating the Sociability of Large Language Models with SocKET Benchmark (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks of social language are lacking for large language models. |
| Approach: | They propose a new benchmark that measures how well large language models understand social language by grouping 58 tasks into five categories: humor & sarcasm, offensiveness, sentiment & emotion, and trustworthiness. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs well at 58 tasks that are divided into five categories: humor & sarcasm, offensiveness, sentiment & emotion, and trustworthiness. |
Rethinking Pragmatics in Large Language Models: Towards Open-Ended Evaluation and Preference Tuning (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to assess social-pragmatic inference in large language models are inadequacy, and preferential tuning is the best approach. |
| Approach: | They propose to use free-form models' responses as a measure to assess social-pragmatic reasoning and advocate for preference optimization over supervised finetuning (SFT). |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms supervised finetuning (SFT) and offers a near-free launch in pragmatic abilities without compromising general capabilities. |
Benchmarking Contextual and Paralinguistic Reasoning in Speech-LLMs: A Case Study with In-the-Wild Data (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Qiongqiong Wang, Hardik Bhupendra Sailor, Tianchi Liu, Wenyu Zhang, Muhammad Huzaifah, Nattadaporn Lertcheva, Shuo Sun, Nancy F. Chen, Jinyang Wu, AiTi Aw
| Challenge: | Recent speech-LLMs have shown impressive performance in tasks like transcription and translation, yet they remain limited in understanding the paralinguistic aspects of speech crucial for social and emotional intelligence. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark for evaluating speech-LLMs on contextual paralinguistic reasoning . the benchmark includes curated question answering datasets requiring both linguistic and empathetic understanding . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark reveals a key gap in existing evaluations and offers insights into building more context-aware and emotionally intelligent LLMs. |
LLMs Are Not Intelligent Thinkers: Introducing Mathematical Topic Tree Benchmark for Comprehensive Evaluation of LLMs (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have impressive capabilities in mathematical reasoning, but their effectiveness is limited to specific mathematical topics. |
| Approach: | They propose to use the MaTT benchmark to assess large language models' accuracy in multiple-choice scenarios. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieved 54% accuracy in a multiple-choice scenario, while the Chain-of-Thought prompting did not improve. |
CUTE: Measuring LLMs’ Understanding of Their Tokens (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) perform well on a wide variety of tasks, authors say . they lack direct access to characters, which can be difficult to generalize to new languages . |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to test the orthographic knowledge of Large Language Models . they find that most LLMs seem to know the spelling of their tokens - yet fail to manipulate text . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark tests the orthographic knowledge of large language models . it finds that most LLMs seem to know the spelling of their tokens, but fail to manipulate text . |
From Remembering to Metacognition: Do Existing Benchmarks Accurately Evaluate LLMs? (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Geng Zhang, Yizhou Ying, Sihang Jiang, Jiaqing Liang, Guanglei Yue, Yifei Fu, Hailin Hu, Yanghua Xiao
| Challenge: | Existing benchmark datasets focus on low-level cognitive tasks while providing limited coverage of higher-level reasoning skills. |
| Approach: | They analyze the cognitive depth of popular LLM benchmarks using Bloom’s Taxonomy to evaluate both the cognitive and knowledge dimensions. |
| Outcome: | The results show that incorporating higher-level cognitive instructions into the current instruction fine-tuning process improves model performance. |
Towards a Danish Semantic Reasoning Benchmark - Compiled from Lexical-Semantic Resources for Assessing Selected Language Understanding Capabilities of Large Language Models (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a semantic reasoning benchmark for Danish is compiled from human-curated lexical-semantic resources. |
| Approach: | They present a semantic reasoning benchmark for Danish compiled semi-automatically from a number of human-curated lexical-semantic resources. |
| Outcome: | The proposed datasets are compiled semi-automatically from human-curated lexical-semantic resources. |