Do LLMs Understand Social Knowledge? Evaluating the Sociability of Large Language Models with SocKET Benchmark (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks of social language are lacking for large language models. |
| Approach: | They propose a new benchmark that measures how well large language models understand social language by grouping 58 tasks into five categories: humor & sarcasm, offensiveness, sentiment & emotion, and trustworthiness. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs well at 58 tasks that are divided into five categories: humor & sarcasm, offensiveness, sentiment & emotion, and trustworthiness. |
Similar Papers
Social Intelligence in the Age of LLMs (2025.naacl-tutorial)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are a powerful tool for integrating human-like communication and context-aware interactions into artificial systems. |
| Approach: | They propose to introduce and overview different aspects of artificial social intelligence and their relationship with LLMs by introducing scientific methods for evaluating social intelligence in LLM. |
| Outcome: | This tutorial will introduce scientific methods for evaluating social intelligence in LLMs, highlighting the key challenges, and identifying promising research directions. |
Are Large Language Models (LLMs) Good Social Predictors? (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies suggest that Large Language Models can generate human-like responses, but it is unclear how well they work and where the plausible predictions derive from. |
| Approach: | They propose to use LLMs to generate human-like responses by mutability and accessibility of social inputs to perform a social prediction task. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs well in three realistic settings and a novel social prediction task. |
CUTE: Measuring LLMs’ Understanding of Their Tokens (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) perform well on a wide variety of tasks, authors say . they lack direct access to characters, which can be difficult to generalize to new languages . |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to test the orthographic knowledge of Large Language Models . they find that most LLMs seem to know the spelling of their tokens - yet fail to manipulate text . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark tests the orthographic knowledge of large language models . it finds that most LLMs seem to know the spelling of their tokens, but fail to manipulate text . |
Evaluating Cultural and Social Awareness of LLM Web Agents (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
Haoyi Qiu, Alexander Fabbri, Divyansh Agarwal, Kung-Hsiang Huang, Sarah Tan, Nanyun Peng, Chien-Sheng Wu
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks often overlook cultural and social awareness . current evaluations focus on task completion, often ignoring the diverse cultural and socio-cultural backgrounds. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to assess LLM agents’ sensitivity to cultural and social norms across two web-based tasks: online shopping and social discussion forums. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework evaluates LLM agents’ ability to detect and appropriately respond to norm-violating user queries and observations across two web-based tasks. |
STEER-BENCH: A Benchmark for Evaluating the Steerability of Large Language Models (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models can adapt outputs to align with community-specific norms, perspectives and communication styles. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to assess community-specific steering using contrasting reddit communities. |
| Outcome: | STEER-BENCH assesses how well large language models understand community-specific instructions, their resilience to adversarial steering attempts, and their ability to accurately represent cultural and ideological perspectives. |
Understanding the Capabilities and Limitations of Large Language Models for Cultural Commonsense (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated substantial commonsense understanding through numerous benchmark evaluations. |
| Approach: | They conduct a comprehensive examination of the capabilities and limitations of several state-of-the-art LLMs in the context of cultural commonsense tasks. |
| Outcome: | The language used to query the LLMs can impact their performance on cultural-related tasks. |
How Predictable Are Large Language Model Capabilities? A Case Study on BIG-bench (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a recent study shows that large language models can be used to predict performance on new configurations. |
| Approach: | They investigate the predictability of large language model capabilities by using BIG-bench . they find a subset of BIG-Bench tasks as informative as BIG-bnch Hard . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves an R2 score greater than 95% on BIG-bench . the model is 3 smaller than BIG-Bench Hard, and the model performs better on the full set. |
From Remembering to Metacognition: Do Existing Benchmarks Accurately Evaluate LLMs? (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Geng Zhang, Yizhou Ying, Sihang Jiang, Jiaqing Liang, Guanglei Yue, Yifei Fu, Hailin Hu, Yanghua Xiao
| Challenge: | Existing benchmark datasets focus on low-level cognitive tasks while providing limited coverage of higher-level reasoning skills. |
| Approach: | They analyze the cognitive depth of popular LLM benchmarks using Bloom’s Taxonomy to evaluate both the cognitive and knowledge dimensions. |
| Outcome: | The results show that incorporating higher-level cognitive instructions into the current instruction fine-tuning process improves model performance. |
Exploring Graph Learning Tasks with Pure LLMs: A Comprehensive Benchmark and Investigation (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies focus on performance benchmarks without fully comparing LLMs to graph learning models. |
| Approach: | They evaluate off-the-shelf and instruction-tuned graph learning models across a variety of scenarios. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models outperform traditional graph learning models in few-shot settings, the authors show . their models out perform models with instruction tuning, and they show excellent generalization and robustness. |
LLMs meet Bloom’s Taxonomy: A Cognitive View on Large Language Model Evaluations (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation approaches for Large Language Models lack a structured approach that reflects the underlying cognitive abilities required for solving the tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a hierarchical approach to evaluation of Large Language Models that leverages Bloom’s Taxonomy to identify how well they cover the levels of Bloom’ s taxonomies. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation frameworks cover the Bloom’s Taxonomy, a hierarchical framework for categorizing cognitive skills, on the most widely used benchmarks. |