Text Fluoroscopy: Detecting LLM-Generated Text through Intrinsic Features (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the field of natural language processing because of their excellent performance on various tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a black-box method with better generalizability for detecting LLM-generated text by mining the intrinsic features of the text to be detected. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves 7.36% and 2.84% improvement in detection performance compared to baselines in detecting texts from different domains generated by GPT-4 and Claude3 respectively. |
Similar Papers
Beat LLMs at Their Own Game: Zero-Shot LLM-Generated Text Detection via Querying ChatGPT (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Biru Zhu, Lifan Yuan, Ganqu Cui, Yangyi Chen, Chong Fu, Bingxiang He, Yangdong Deng, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun, Ming Gu
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are capable of performing tasks but are likely to be misused. |
| Approach: | They propose a zero-shot black-box method to detect LLM-generated texts . they revise the text to be detected using the ChatGPT model . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can detect LLM-generated texts with a zero-shot black-box model . it is based on intuition that the model will make fewer revisions to LLMs than to human-written texts . |
A Survey on Detection of LLMs-Generated Content (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Xianjun Yang, Liangming Pan, Xuandong Zhao, Haifeng Chen, Linda Petzold, William Yang Wang, Wei Cheng
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models have led to an increase in synthetic content generation . the ability to detect LLMs-generated content has become of paramount importance . |
| Approach: | They propose to provide a detailed overview of existing detection strategies and benchmarks, scrutinizing their differences and advocating for more adaptable and robust models to enhance detection accuracy. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model will be able to detect human-written content in real time. |
LLM-DetectAIve: a Tool for Fine-Grained Machine-Generated Text Detection (2024.emnlp-demo)
Copied to clipboard
Mervat Abassy, Kareem Elozeiri, Alexander Aziz, Minh Ta, Raj Tomar, Bimarsha Adhikari, Saad Ahmed, Yuxia Wang, Osama Mohammed Afzal, Zhuohan Xie, Jonibek Mansurov, Ekaterina Artemova, Vladislav Mikhailov, Rui Xing, Jiahui Geng, Hasan Iqbal, Zain Mujahid, Tarek Mahmoud, Akim Tsvigun, Alham Aji, Artem Shelmanov, Nizar Habash, Iryna Gurevych, Preslav Nakov
| Challenge: | a large number of machine-generated texts are often hard to distinguish between human-written and machine-generated text . this raises concerns about potential misuse, especially within educational and academic domains . |
| Approach: | They propose a system that can detect whether a text is human-written or machine-generated . they use a fine-grained classification schema to identify the use of machine-generated text . |
| Outcome: | The proposed system can distinguish between human-written and machine-generated text . it can detect attempts to obfuscate the fact that a text was machine- generated . |
Learning to Rewrite: Generalized LLM-Generated Text Detection (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing detectors for Large Language Models (LLMs) struggle to generalize in open-world settings. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to detect LLM-generated text with exceptional generalization to unseen domains by reinforcing LLMs’ inherent rewriting tendencies. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms state-of-the-art detection methods by 23.04% in AUROC, 35.10% for out-of distribution tests, and 48.66% under adversarial attacks. |
MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the Wild (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yafu Li, Qintong Li, Leyang Cui, Wei Bi, Zhilin Wang, Longyue Wang, Linyi Yang, Shuming Shi, Yue Zhang
| Challenge: | Existing research has focused on evaluating detection methods for specific domains or language models. |
| Approach: | They build a testbed to detect texts from diverse human writings and LLMs using different detection methods. |
| Outcome: | Empirical results show that the top performing detector can identify 84.12% out-of-domain texts generated by a new LLM, indicating the feasibility for application scenarios. |
FAID: Fine-grained AI-generated Text Detection using Multi-task Auxiliary and Multi-level Contrastive Learning (2026.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Minh Ngoc Ta, Dong Cao Van, Duc-Anh Hoang, Minh Le-Anh, Truong Nguyen, My Anh Tran Nguyen, Yuxia Wang, Preslav Nakov, Dinh Viet Sang
| Challenge: | Existing binary detection frameworks for human-written, LLM-generated and human-LLM collaborative texts are challenging . a recent study focused on binary detection, i.e., human vs. LLM, or on fine-grained detection limited to English. |
| Approach: | They propose a fine-grained detection framework to classify text into three categories . they use multilingual datasets and a multi-domain, multi-generator dataset . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms baselines on unseen domains and new LLMs. |
Enhancing LLM Text Detection with Retrieved Contexts and Logits Distribution Consistency (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for detecting large language models (LLMs) generate fluent text, but they only use a few tokens due to the short length or insufficient information in some texts. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that leverages external text corpora to evaluate the difference in logit distribution of input text under retrieved human-written and LLM-rewritten contexts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves state-of-the-art performance in AUROC on five public datasets with three widely-used source LLMs. |
EvoBench: Towards Real-world LLM-Generated Text Detection Benchmarking for Evolving Large Language Models (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to detect LLM-generated texts rely on static benchmarks that neglect the evolving nature of LLMs. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate the generalization of LLM-generated text detection methods. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark measures generalization of 14 detection methods across LLMs. |
Token Prediction as Implicit Classification to Identify LLM-Generated Text (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a novel approach for identifying large language models (LLMs) involved in text generation is proposed . instead of adding an additional classification layer, we reframe the classification task as a next-token prediction task . |
| Approach: | They propose a novel approach for identifying large language models involved in text generation . instead of adding an additional classification layer, they reframe the task as a next-token prediction task . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method performs exceptionally well in the text classification task . it can distinguish distinctive writing styles among various LLMs even without an explicit classifier. |
M4: Multi-generator, Multi-domain, and Multi-lingual Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detection (2024.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yuxia Wang, Jonibek Mansurov, Petar Ivanov, Jinyan Su, Artem Shelmanov, Akim Tsvigun, Chenxi Whitehouse, Osama Mohammed Afzal, Tarek Mahmoud, Toru Sasaki, Thomas Arnold, Alham Aji, Nizar Habash, Iryna Gurevych, Preslav Nakov
| Challenge: | Large language models generate fluent responses to user queries, but they are also susceptible to misuse in journalism, education, and academia. |
| Approach: | They propose a large-scale benchmark for machine-generated text detection that is a multi-generator, multi-domain, and multi-lingual corpus. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system can detect machine-generated text and pinpoint misuse . the proposed system is based on a large-scale benchmark dataset . |