One Prompt To Rule Them All: LLMs for Opinion Summary Evaluation (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Tejpalsingh Siledar, Swaroop Nath, Sankara Muddu, Rupasai Rangaraju, Swaprava Nath, Pushpak Bhattacharyya, Suman Banerjee, Amey Patil, Sudhanshu Singh, Muthusamy Chelliah, Nikesh Garera
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation methods for opinion summarizations lack adequate opinion summary evaluation datasets. |
| Approach: | They propose a dataset that combines 7 dimensions crucial to opinion summaries . they propose OP-I-PROMPT, a dimension-independent prompt, and OP PROMPTS, . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves a Spearman correlation of 0.70 with human judgments, surpassing prior methods. |
Similar Papers
PrExMe! Large Scale Prompt Exploration of Open Source LLMs for Machine Translation and Summarization Evaluation (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are useful for low-resource scenarios and time-restricted applications. |
| Approach: | They propose a large-scale evaluation tool for large language models that uses prompts . they evaluate 720 prompt templates for open-source LLM-based metrics on MT and summarization datasets a 6.6M evaluations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model evaluates 720 prompt templates on machine translation and summarization datasets. |
Argument Summarization and its Evaluation in the Era of Large Language Models (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Moritz Altemeyer, Steffen Eger, Johannes Daxenberger, Yanran Chen, Tim Altendorf, Philipp Cimiano, Benjamin Schiller
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized various Natural Language Generation tasks, including Argument Summarization (ArgSum). |
| Approach: | They propose a prompt-based evaluation scheme and validate it through a human benchmark dataset. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation scheme outperforms existing methods and is validated by a human benchmark dataset. |
LLM-Rubric: A Multidimensional, Calibrated Approach to Automated Evaluation of Natural Language Texts (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing frameworks for the automated evaluation of natural language texts are based on a large language model (LLM) that fails to agree with human judges and is not fully validated by the human judges. |
| Approach: | They propose a large language model (LLM) that generates a distribution over potential responses to assess multiple dimensions of interest. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework predicts human judges' assessment of user satisfaction on a scale of 1–4 with an RMS error 0.5, a 2 improvement over the uncalibrated baseline. |
All Prompts Are Created Equal? Evaluating Robustness of LLM Judges Against Non-Adversarial Prompt Variations (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Our work establishes new standards for assessing LLM judge reliability beyond simple accuracy metrics. |
| Approach: | They propose a diagnostic framework grounded in attribute verifiability that enables principled decisions about evaluation automation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework establishes new standards for assessing LLM judge reliability beyond simple accuracy metrics. |
SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluation (2021.tacl-1)
Copied to clipboard
Alexander R. Fabbri, Wojciech Kryściński, Bryan McCann, Caiming Xiong, Richard Socher, Dragomir Radev
| Challenge: | a lack of comprehensive studies on evaluation metrics for text summarization hinders progress . a new study aims to improve evaluation metrics that correlate with human judgments . |
| Approach: | They propose to re-evaluate automatic evaluation metrics and share a toolkit for evaluation . they hope to promote a more complete evaluation protocol for text summarization . |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation metrics are inconsistent with existing evaluation protocols. |
ProSA: Assessing and Understanding the Prompt Sensitivity of LLMs (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent research has neglected instances-level prompt variations and their implications on subjective evaluations. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to evaluate and comprehend prompt sensitivity in large language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework evaluates and comprehends prompt sensitivity in large language models. |
AXCEL: Automated eXplainable Consistency Evaluation using LLMs (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
P Aditya Sreekar, Sahil Verma, Suransh Chopra, Abhishek Persad, Sarik Ghazarian, Narayanan Sadagopan
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely used for various tasks but evaluating the consistency of generated text remains a challenge. |
| Approach: | They propose a prompt-based consistency metric which provides explanations for consistency scores by providing detailed reasoning and pinpointing inconsistent text spans. |
| Outcome: | The proposed metric outperforms state-of-the-art metrics in summarization, free text generation and data-to-text conversion tasks by 8.7% and 6.2%. |
You don’t need a personality test to know these models are unreliable: Assessing the Reliability of Large Language Models on Psychometric Instruments (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Bangzhao Shu, Lechen Zhang, Minje Choi, Lavinia Dunagan, Lajanugen Logeswaran, Moontae Lee, Dallas Card, David Jurgens
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are popular for research in social sciences . currently, prompting LLMs is insufficient to accurately and reliably capture model perceptions, and we discuss potential alternatives to improve this. |
| Approach: | They construct a dataset that contains 693 questions encompassing 39 different instruments of persona measurement on 115 persona axes and a set of questions containing minor variations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can generate answers and negate statements in a consistent and robust manner. |
Large Language Models are Not Yet Human-Level Evaluators for Abstractive Summarization (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | ChatGPT and GPT-4 are popular as evaluation metric for complex generative tasks . however, they are not ready as human replacements due to significant limitations . |
| Approach: | They conduct extensive analysis to examine the stability and reliability of LLMs as automatic evaluators for abstractive summarization. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods outperform the commonly used automatic metrics but are not ready for human evaluation due to significant limitations. |
Leveraging Large Language Models for NLG Evaluation: Advances and Challenges (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | introducing Large Language Models (LLMs) has opened new avenues for assessing generated content quality, e.g., coherence, creativity, and context relevance. |
| Approach: | They propose a taxonomy for organizing existing LLM-based evaluation metrics and a structured framework to understand and compare them. |
| Outcome: | The proposed taxonomy offers a framework to understand and compare LLM-based evaluation methods. |