AIR-Bench: Benchmarking Large Audio-Language Models via Generative Comprehension (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Qian Yang, Jin Xu, Wenrui Liu, Yunfei Chu, Ziyue Jiang, Xiaohuan Zhou, Yichong Leng, Yuanjun Lv, Zhou Zhao, Chang Zhou, Jingren Zhou
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for audio-centric interaction have impeded advancements in this field . AIR-Bench evaluates LALMs' ability to understand audio signals and interact with humans . |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate the ability of large audio-language models to understand audio signals . they use 19 tasks with approximately 19k single-choice questions to examine single-task ability . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework evaluates the ability of large audio-language models to understand audio signals and interact with humans in the textual format. |
Similar Papers
Benchmarking Open-ended Audio Dialogue Understanding for Large Audio-Language Models (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs) have recently unlocked audio dialogue capabilities, enabling direct spoken exchanges with humans. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate LALMs' open-ended audio dialogue ability in 3 general scenarios, 12 skills, 9 multilingual languages, and 4 categories of ambiguity handling. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark assesses the open-ended audio dialogue ability for LALMs in 3 general scenarios, 12 skills, 9 multilingual languages, and 4 categories of ambiguity handling. |
SCENEBench: An Audio Understanding Benchmark Grounded in Assistive and Industrial Use Cases (2026.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models that measure audio comprehension beyond automatic speech recognition lack performance and latency. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark suite that measures audio comprehension beyond automatic speech recognition . the benchmark suite includes a small human-recorded evaluation split per category . |
| Outcome: | The proposed suite measures audio comprehension beyond speech recognition . it includes a small human-recorded evaluation split per category . |
AudioBench: A Universal Benchmark for Audio Large Language Models (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Bin Wang, Xunlong Zou, Geyu Lin, Shuo Sun, Zhuohan Liu, Wenyu Zhang, Zhengyuan Liu, AiTi Aw, Nancy F. Chen
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation regimes for audio large language models do not cover the breadth of their possible use cases. |
| Approach: | They propose to use AudioBench to evaluate audio large language models . they found that no single model excels consistently across all tasks . |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation targets speech understanding, audio scene understanding, and voice understanding (paralinguistic) . no single model excels consistently across all tasks, the paper found . |
VCB Bench: An Evaluation Benchmark for Audio-Grounded Large Language Model Conversational Agents (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Jiliang Hu, Wenfu Wang, Zuchao Li, Chenxing Li, Yiyang Zhao, Hanzhao Li, Liqiang Zhang, Meng Yu, Dong Yu
| Challenge: | despite advances in multimodal conversational systems, current benchmarks lack comprehensive evaluation across key dimensions. |
| Approach: | They propose a Chinese benchmark built exclusively on real human speech to fill this gap . they assess LALMs across three complementary axes: instruction following, knowledge understanding, robustness . |
| Outcome: | VCB Bench assesses LALMs across three complementary axes: instruction following, knowledge understanding, and robustness . VCBM Bench provides reproducible and fine-grained framework for Chinese voice chat bots . results show significant performance disparities and offer tangible insights for future improvements . |
Towards Holistic Evaluation of Large Audio-Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large audio-language models (LALMs) have expanded their impact beyond natural language processing (NLP) to multimodal domains. |
| Approach: | They propose a systematic taxonomy for LALM evaluations, categorizing them into four dimensions based on their objectives: (1) General Auditory Awareness and Processing, (2) Knowledge and Reasoning, (3) Dialogue-oriented Ability, and (4) Fairness, Safety, and Trustworthiness. |
| Outcome: | The proposed taxonomy categorizes LALM evaluations into four dimensions based on their objectives and highlights challenges in this field. |
The BiGGen Bench: A Principled Benchmark for Fine-grained Evaluation of Language Models with Language Models (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Seungone Kim, Juyoung Suk, Ji Yong Cho, Shayne Longpre, Chaeeun Kim, Dongkeun Yoon, Guijin Son, Yejin Cho, Sheikh Shafayat, Jinheon Baek, Sue Hyun Park, Hyeonbin Hwang, Jinkyung Jo, Hyowon Cho, Haebin Shin, Seongyun Lee, Hanseok Oh, Noah Lee, Namgyu Ho, Se June Joo, Miyoung Ko, Yoonjoo Lee, Hyungjoo Chae, Jamin Shin, Joel Jang, Seonghyeon Ye, Bill Yuchen Lin, Sean Welleck, Graham Neubig, Moontae Lee, Kyungjae Lee, Minjoon Seo
| Challenge: | a recent study evaluated language models using abstract evaluation criteria that lack the flexibility and granularity of human assessment. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate nine distinct language models' capabilities . they use instance-specific evaluation criteria to mirror human evaluation . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates nine distinct capabilities of language models across 77 tasks. |
RSA-Bench: Benchmarking Audio Large Models in Real-World Acoustic Scenarios (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Yibo Zhang, Kaiwen Luo, Liang Lin, Shilinlu Yan, Jin Wang, Yaoqi Guo, Yitian Chen, Yalan Qin, Zhenhong Zhou, Kun Wang, Li Sun
| Challenge: | Existing evaluations rely on synthetic Gaussian noise or simplistic single-source interference, failing to capture the intricate, multi-layered acoustic dynamics that characterize authentic physical environments. |
| Approach: | They propose a robustness benchmark to stress-test Audio Large Models (ALLMs) using high-fidelity auditory scene simulations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs well on a wide range of tasks, including automatic speech recognition, speech translation, and audio-based reasoning. |
VoiceBench: Benchmarking LLM-Based Voice Assistants (2026.tacl-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have enabled real-time speech interactions through LLMs. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark specifically designed to assess LLM-based voice assistants. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark measures the performance of LLM-based voice assistants across eight tasks. |
URO-Bench: Towards Comprehensive Evaluation for End-to-End Spoken Dialogue Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a lack of comprehensive evaluations for SDMs in speech-to-speech (S2S) scenarios is a major challenge for end-to end spoken dialogue models. |
| Approach: | They propose to provide an extensive evaluation framework for end-to-end spoken dialogue models (SDMs) that includes both cognitive dimensions and paralinguistic cues . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark is divided into two difficulty levels: basic track and pro track, each comprising 20 test sets, evaluating the spoken dialogue model’s abilities in U**nderstanding, **R**easoning, and **O**ral conversation. |
AIR-Bench: Automated Heterogeneous Information Retrieval Benchmark (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Evaluation benchmarks based on predefined domains and human-labeled data face limitations in addressing evaluation needs for emerging domains. |
| Approach: | They propose an automated information retrieval benchmark based on predefined domains and human-labeled data . AIR-Bench is automated and Heterogeneous with three key features . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks are based on predefined domains and human-labeled data. |