Challenge: Feature attribution methods are often evaluated on metrics such as comprehensiveness and sufficiency.
Approach: They propose to use beam search to define problem of optimizing an explanation for a metric . they also propose to evaluate the metric on one or more metrics to determine its solvability .
Outcome: The proposed explainer can solve the problem of optimizing an explanation for a metric by beam search.

Similar Papers

Goodhart’s Law Applies to NLP’s Explanation Benchmarks (2024.findings-eacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Popular methods for "explaining" the outputs of natural language processing (NLP) models operate by highlighting a subset of input tokens that ought, in some sense, to be salient.
Approach: They propose to inflate a model’s comprehensiveness and sufficiency scores dramatically without altering its predictions or explanations on in-distribution inputs.
Outcome: The proposed metrics exploit the tendency for extracted explanations and complements to be “out-of-support” relative to each other and in-distribution inputs.
Evaluating Explanation Methods for Neural Machine Translation (2020.acl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Neural machine translation (NMT) has seen great success during recent years.
Approach: They propose a metric that measures the fidelity of explanation methods on translation tasks . they use an efficient approximation to evaluate several explanation methods .
Outcome: The proposed metric is efficient and can be used on translation tasks.
On Evaluating Explanation Utility for Human-AI Decision Making in NLP (2024.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a lack of evidence that explanations help people in situations they are introduced for is a problem in NLP . prior work on explainability has focused on overcoming technical challenges and used proxy evaluations.
Approach: They propose to use existing metrics to evaluate the effectiveness of explanations in NLP . they argue that providing AI predictions does not cause decision makers to speed up work .
Outcome: The proposed evaluations show that providing AI predictions does not cause decision makers to speed up their work without compromising performance.
A Comparative Study of Faithfulness Metrics for Model Interpretability Methods (2022.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods to reveal the reasoning processes of machine learning models are difficult to interpret due to their complexity.
Approach: They propose to use diagnosticity and complexity to assess faithfulness of machine learning models . they propose to apply posthoc interpretation methods to reveal reasoning behind models based on internal reasoning .
Outcome: The proposed interpretation metrics show conflicting preferences when comparing interpretations . sufficiency and comprehensiveness metrics have higher diagnosticity and lower complexity .
On Sample Based Explanation Methods for NLP: Faithfulness, Efficiency and Semantic Evaluation (2021.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for explaining "black-box" models such as Influence Functions are becoming more popular.
Approach: They propose a semantic-based evaluation metric that can better align with humans’ judgment of explanations than the widely adopted diagnostic or re-training measures.
Outcome: The proposed method can better align with humans’ judgment of explanations than diagnostic or re-training measures.
EXPERT: An Explainable Image Captioning Evaluation Metric with Structured Explanations (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies on explainable evaluation metrics generate explanations without standardized criteria and the overall quality of the generated explanations remains unverified.
Approach: They propose a reference-free evaluation metric that provides structured explanations based on fluency, relevance, and descriptiveness.
Outcome: The proposed evaluation template achieves state-of-the-art on benchmark datasets while providing significantly higher-quality explanations than existing metrics.
The Inside Story: Towards Better Understanding of Machine Translation Neural Evaluation Metrics (2023.acl-short)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Neural metrics for machine translation evaluation are considered "black boxes" lexical overlap-based metrics are popular for evaluation of translation systems and algorithms .
Approach: They develop and compare several neural explainability methods to understand translation errors . they aim to better understand the correspondence between token-level explanations and human annotated error spans .
Outcome: The proposed methods leverage token-level information that can be directly attributed to translation errors.
Towards Interpretable and Efficient Automatic Reference-Based Summarization Evaluation (2023.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Compared to neural systems, automatic metrics should be interpretable and provide intuitive insights into system performance and output quality.
Approach: They propose to use a two-stage evaluation pipeline to extract basic information units from one text sequence and check the extracted units in another sequence.
Outcome: The proposed metrics can provide high interpretability at both the fine-grained unit level and summary level, and one-stage metrics that achieve a balance between efficiency and interpretability.
Evaluating Explainable AI: Which Algorithmic Explanations Help Users Predict Model Behavior? (2020.acl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a new study examines the impact of algorithmic explanations on simulatability of machine learning models . a model is simulatable when a person can predict its behavior on new inputs .
Approach: They conduct human subject tests to isolate effect of algorithmic explanations on simulatability . they find ratings of explanations are not predictive of how helpful they are .
Outcome: The results provide the first reliable estimates of how explanations influence simulatability . they show that ratings are not predictive of how helpful explanations are .
A Diagnostic Study of Explainability Techniques for Text Classification (2020.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing explainability techniques that can be produced post-hoc with already trained models are lacking a definitive guide on how to choose one given a particular task and model architecture.
Approach: They propose to use a list of diagnostic properties to evaluate existing explainability techniques to compare them with human annotations of salient input regions.
Outcome: The proposed list compares a set of explainability techniques on downstream text classification tasks and neural network architectures.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations