Challenge: Existing methods for explaining "black-box" models such as Influence Functions are becoming more popular.
Approach: They propose a semantic-based evaluation metric that can better align with humans’ judgment of explanations than the widely adopted diagnostic or re-training measures.
Outcome: The proposed method can better align with humans’ judgment of explanations than diagnostic or re-training measures.

Similar Papers

SHAP-Based Explanation Methods: A Review for NLP Interpretability (2022.coling-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing models with opacity problems have been proposed to address this problem.
Approach: They propose a unified local-interpretability framework with a rigorous theoretical foundation on the game-theoretic concept of Shapley values.
Outcome: The proposed framework is based on the Shapley-value-based model explanations.
On Evaluating Explanation Utility for Human-AI Decision Making in NLP (2024.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a lack of evidence that explanations help people in situations they are introduced for is a problem in NLP . prior work on explainability has focused on overcoming technical challenges and used proxy evaluations.
Approach: They propose to use existing metrics to evaluate the effectiveness of explanations in NLP . they argue that providing AI predictions does not cause decision makers to speed up work .
Outcome: The proposed evaluations show that providing AI predictions does not cause decision makers to speed up their work without compromising performance.
Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How Should We Define and Evaluate Faithfulness? (2020.acl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Current approaches to interpretability evaluation focus on faithfulness criteria . current approaches focus on readability, plausibility and faithfulness .
Approach: They argue that current binary definition of faithfulness sets unrealistic standards . they argue that a more graded definition would be of greater practical utility .
Outcome: The proposed approach is based on three assumptions and lacks a graded definition of faithfulness.
A Survey of the State of Explainable AI for Natural Language Processing (2020.aacl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent years have seen significant advances in the quality of state-of-the-art models, but they have come at the expense of models becoming less interpretable.
Approach: This survey examines the current state of Explainable AI within the domain of NLP . they detail the operations and explainability techniques currently available for generating explanations for NLP models .
Outcome: This survey examines the state of explainable AI (XAI) within the domain of natural language processing . it focuses on the operations and explainability techniques currently available for NLP models .
Evaluating Explanation Methods for Neural Machine Translation (2020.acl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Neural machine translation (NMT) has seen great success during recent years.
Approach: They propose a metric that measures the fidelity of explanation methods on translation tasks . they use an efficient approximation to evaluate several explanation methods .
Outcome: The proposed metric is efficient and can be used on translation tasks.
Interpretable Text Embeddings and Text Similarity Explanation: A Survey (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Text embeddings are a fundamental component in many NLP tasks, but their interpretation and explanation remain challenging.
Approach: They propose a framework for interpretable text embeddings and text similarity explanation . they characterize the main ideas, approaches, and trade-offs and discuss lessons learned .
Outcome: The proposed methods are compared with existing models and compare them with existing ones.
Towards Explainable NLP: A Generative Explanation Framework for Text Classification (P19-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing approaches for explainable machine learning systems focus on interpreting outputs or connections between inputs and outputs.
Approach: They propose a generative explanation framework that learns to make classification decisions and generates fine-grained explanations at the same time.
Outcome: The proposed framework surpasses all baselines on two datasets and generates concise explanations at the same time.
Human-Centered Evaluation of Explanations (2022.naacl-tutorials)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: This tutorial will provide an overview of human-centered evaluations of explanations .
Approach: This tutorial will provide an overview of human-centered evaluations of explanations . it will introduce the psychological foundation of explanation and types of NLP explanations.
Outcome: This tutorial will provide an overview of human-centered evaluations of explanations . it will cover the two categories of evaluation: evaluation based on human-annotated explanations and evaluation with human-subjects studies.
Towards Explainable Evaluation of Language Models on the Semantic Similarity of Visual Concepts (2022.coling-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent advances in NLP research have focused on robustness and explainability issues of their evaluation strategies.
Approach: They propose to use pre-trained transformers to evaluate semantic similarity for visual vocabularies . they propose to provide explainable metrics for understanding the quality of retrieved instances .
Outcome: The proposed metrics highlight inabilities of widely used evaluation methods and highlight weaknesses in learned linguistic representations.
Evaluating Readability and Faithfulness of Concept-based Explanations (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for evaluating concepts from different perspectives lack a unified formalization.
Approach: They propose a formal definition of concepts generalizing to diverse concept-based explanations’ settings and apply it to other types of explanations or tasks.
Outcome: Extensive experimental analysis was carried out to determine the evaluation measures for explanation evaluation measures.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations