Can LMs Generalize to Future Data? An Empirical Analysis on Text Summarization (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing summarization benchmarks overlap in time with pre-training corpora and fine-tuning datasets. |
| Approach: | They propose a temporal generalization benchmark that contains data samples from 2010 to 2022 to understand the temporal ability of abstractive summarization models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark analyzes data samples from 2010 to 2022 to understand the temporal generalization ability of abstractive summarization models. |
Similar Papers
What Have We Achieved on Text Summarization? (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for text summarization have been investigated, but there are still gaps between them and human professionals. |
| Approach: | They analyze 8 major sources of errors on 10 representative summarization models manually. |
| Outcome: | Aiming to gain more understanding of summarization systems with respect to their strengths and limitations on a fine-grained syntactic and semantic level, we use 8 major sources of errors on 10 representative summarizing models. |
Is Your LLM Outdated? A Deep Look at Temporal Generalization (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to evaluate large language models are limited due to their inherent dynamic nature and the inherent dynamicity of language and information. |
| Approach: | They introduce a new evaluation framework that employs fresh text and event prediction for assessing LLMs’ temporal adaptability. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework shows significant temporal biases and a decline in performance over time. |
Benchmarking Generation and Evaluation Capabilities of Large Language Models for Instruction Controllable Summarization (2024.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
Yixin Liu, Alexander Fabbri, Jiawen Chen, Yilun Zhao, Simeng Han, Shafiq Joty, Pengfei Liu, Dragomir Radev, Chien-Sheng Wu, Arman Cohan
| Challenge: | Recent studies have found that large language models (LLMs) can achieve state-of-the-art performance on generic summarization benchmarks, but their performance on more complex summarizing task settings is less studied. |
| Approach: | They benchmark large language models on instruction controllable text summarization . they use 4 evaluation protocols and 11 LLMs to evaluate their performance . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs well on instruction controllable text summarization tasks with 4 evaluation protocols and 11 LLMs. |
Training Dynamics for Text Summarization Models (2022.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Pre-trained language models have shown impressive results when fine-tuned on large summarization datasets. |
| Approach: | They analyze the training dynamics for generation models, focusing on summarization . they find that a propensity to copy the input is learned early in the training process . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model learns at different stages of fine-tuning, the authors show . they show that factual errors are learnt in later stages, but not at high-loss tokens . |
On Learning to Summarize with Large Language Models as References (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yixin Liu, Kejian Shi, Katherine He, Longtian Ye, Alexander Fabbri, Pengfei Liu, Dragomir Radev, Arman Cohan
| Challenge: | Recent studies have found that summaries generated by large language models (LLMs) are favored by human annotators when compared to reference summary from widely used summarization datasets. |
| Approach: | They propose to use large language models (LLMs) as reference learning settings for smaller text summarization models to investigate whether their performance can be substantially improved. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms standard supervised fine-tuning and human evaluations while retaining human-level performance. |
Searching for Effective Neural Extractive Summarization: What Works and What’s Next (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent years have seen success in the use of deep neural networks on text summarization, but there is no clear understanding of why they perform so well or how they might be improved. |
| Approach: | They propose to use different types of model architectures to improve extractive summarization systems. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves state-of-the-art on CNN/DailyMail by a large margin based on observations and analysis. |
An Empirical Study of Many-to-Many Summarization with Large Language Models (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Jiaan Wang, Fandong Meng, Zengkui Sun, Yunlong Liang, Yuxuan Cao, Jiarong Xu, Haoxiang Shi, Jie Zhou
| Challenge: | Recent studies have shown that large language models (LLMs) have strong multilingual abilities, giving them the potential to perform M2MS in real applications. |
| Approach: | They propose to use many-to-many summarization (M2MS) to generate a brief summary in any language given a document also in any other language. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms zero-shot LLMs in terms of automatic evaluations. |
SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluation (2021.tacl-1)
Copied to clipboard
Alexander R. Fabbri, Wojciech Kryściński, Bryan McCann, Caiming Xiong, Richard Socher, Dragomir Radev
| Challenge: | a lack of comprehensive studies on evaluation metrics for text summarization hinders progress . a new study aims to improve evaluation metrics that correlate with human judgments . |
| Approach: | They propose to re-evaluate automatic evaluation metrics and share a toolkit for evaluation . they hope to promote a more complete evaluation protocol for text summarization . |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation metrics are inconsistent with existing evaluation protocols. |
Are Large Language Model Temporally Grounded? (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent large language models lack a consistent temporal model of textual narratives . sentence ordering in unlabelled texts is only weakly correlated with event ordering . |
| Approach: | They evaluate LLMs with textual narratives and evaluate their common-sense knowledge . they find that LLM models struggle the most with self-consistency . |
| Outcome: | The proposed models lack a consistent temporal model of textual narratives. |
How Far are We from Robust Long Abstractive Summarization? (2022.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Abstractive summarization has made tremendous progress in recent years . however, even under a short document setting, abstractive models often generate summaries that are repetitive, ungrammatical, and factually inconsistent with the source. |
| Approach: | They perform fine-grained human annotations to evaluate long document abstractive summarization systems and develop factual consistency metrics. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can generate more relevant summaries but not factual ones. |