Challenge: Recent studies have found that summaries generated by large language models (LLMs) are favored by human annotators when compared to reference summary from widely used summarization datasets.
Approach: They propose to use large language models (LLMs) as reference learning settings for smaller text summarization models to investigate whether their performance can be substantially improved.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms standard supervised fine-tuning and human evaluations while retaining human-level performance.

Similar Papers

Benchmarking Generation and Evaluation Capabilities of Large Language Models for Instruction Controllable Summarization (2024.findings-naacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies have found that large language models (LLMs) can achieve state-of-the-art performance on generic summarization benchmarks, but their performance on more complex summarizing task settings is less studied.
Approach: They benchmark large language models on instruction controllable text summarization . they use 4 evaluation protocols and 11 LLMs to evaluate their performance .
Outcome: The proposed model performs well on instruction controllable text summarization tasks with 4 evaluation protocols and 11 LLMs.
An Empirical Study of Many-to-Many Summarization with Large Language Models (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies have shown that large language models (LLMs) have strong multilingual abilities, giving them the potential to perform M2MS in real applications.
Approach: They propose to use many-to-many summarization (M2MS) to generate a brief summary in any language given a document also in any other language.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms zero-shot LLMs in terms of automatic evaluations.
Evaluating Small Language Models for News Summarization: Implications and Factors Influencing Performance (2025.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) provide superior summarization quality, but their high computational resource requirements limit practical use applications.
Approach: They evaluate 19 small language models for news summarization across 2,000 news samples . they find that top-performing models achieve comparable results to those of 70B LLMs .
Outcome: The proposed models achieve comparable results to 70B LLMs while generating more concise summaries.
Can Large Language Model Summarizers Adapt to Diverse Scientific Communication Goals? (2024.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent work on the evaluation of large language models (LLMs) has shown unprecedented performance on diverse language generation tasks.
Approach: They investigate the controllability of large language models on scientific summarization tasks by controlling stylistic and content coverage factors.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms humans on the MuP review generation task in terms of similarity to reference summaries and human preferences.
CNNSum: Exploring Long-Context Summarization with Large Language Models in Chinese Novels (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Currently, long-context summarization mainly relies on memory ability.
Approach: They propose a multi-scale long-context summarization benchmark based on Chinese novels . they use human-driven annotations to analyze long-constituency models .
Outcome: The proposed benchmark features human-driven annotations across four subsets with lengths ranging from 16k to 128k.
Automatic Evaluation of Attribution by Large Language Models (2023.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Generative large language models (LLMs) incorporate external references to generate and support claims. however, evaluating the attribution remains an open problem.
Approach: They investigate automatic evaluation of attribution given by large language models . they define different types of attributed errors and then explore two approaches .
Outcome: The proposed methods highlight promising signals and challenges.
Assessing the Capabilities of Large Language Models in Coreference: An Evaluation (2024.lrec-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) are a new approach to coreference resolution, but their performance is not yet fully understood.
Approach: They propose that future efforts should improve scope, data, and evaluation methods of traditional coreference research to adapt to the development of LLMs.
Outcome: The proposed methods improve scope, data, and evaluation methods of traditional coreference research to adapt to the development of LLMs.
TriSum: Learning Summarization Ability from Large Language Models with Structured Rationale (2024.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) have advanced tasks like text summarization, but their size and computational demands limit their use in resource-constrained and privacy-centric settings.
Approach: They propose a framework for distilling LLMs’ text summarization abilities into a compact, local model using a curriculum learning strategy that evolves from simple to complex tasks.
Outcome: The proposed framework outperforms baseline models on CNN/DailyMail, XSum, and ClinicalTrial, and improves interpretability by providing insights into the summarization rationale.
I Learn Better If You Speak My Language: Understanding the Superior Performance of Fine-Tuning Large Language Models with LLM-Generated Responses (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent research has demonstrated that a large language model (LLM) can generate training data for another LLM, or for creating supplementary training materials, such as rationales.
Approach: They conduct an in-depth investigation to understand why fine-tuning an LLM with responses generated by a LLM often yields better results than using responses generated from humans.
Outcome: The proposed approach can be used to transfer knowledge from a larger model to a smaller one, or for creating supplementary training materials, such as rationales.
On Context Utilization in Summarization with Large Language Models (2024.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models excel in abstractive summarization tasks, delivering fluent and pertinent summaries.
Approach: They conduct the first comprehensive study on context utilization and position bias in summarization.
Outcome: The proposed benchmark compares two methods to alleviate position bias in summarization tasks.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations