Challenge: Recent studies have shown that large language models (LLMs) have strong multilingual abilities, giving them the potential to perform M2MS in real applications.
Approach: They propose to use many-to-many summarization (M2MS) to generate a brief summary in any language given a document also in any other language.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms zero-shot LLMs in terms of automatic evaluations.

Similar Papers

Benchmarking Generation and Evaluation Capabilities of Large Language Models for Instruction Controllable Summarization (2024.findings-naacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies have found that large language models (LLMs) can achieve state-of-the-art performance on generic summarization benchmarks, but their performance on more complex summarizing task settings is less studied.
Approach: They benchmark large language models on instruction controllable text summarization . they use 4 evaluation protocols and 11 LLMs to evaluate their performance .
Outcome: The proposed model performs well on instruction controllable text summarization tasks with 4 evaluation protocols and 11 LLMs.
Towards Unifying Multi-Lingual and Cross-Lingual Summarization (2023.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing work on multilingual summarization and cross-lingual summmarization has been limited due to their different definitions.
Approach: They propose to unify MLS and CLS into a more general setting, i.e. many-to-many summarization.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms the state-of-the-art models in the zero-shot directions.
Multilingual Machine Translation with Large Language Models: Empirical Results and Analysis (2024.findings-naacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies show that large language models (LLMs) can handle multilingual machine translation (MMT) However, the multilingual translation ability of LLMs remains under-explored.
Approach: They evaluate eight popular LLMs including ChatGPT and GPT-4 to determine their performance in multilingual machine translation.
Outcome: The proposed model can generate moderate translation even on zero-resource languages and cross-lingual exemplars can provide better task guidance for low-resourced translation than exemplar in the same language pairs.
On Learning to Summarize with Large Language Models as References (2024.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies have found that summaries generated by large language models (LLMs) are favored by human annotators when compared to reference summary from widely used summarization datasets.
Approach: They propose to use large language models (LLMs) as reference learning settings for smaller text summarization models to investigate whether their performance can be substantially improved.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms standard supervised fine-tuning and human evaluations while retaining human-level performance.
Can Large Language Model Summarizers Adapt to Diverse Scientific Communication Goals? (2024.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent work on the evaluation of large language models (LLMs) has shown unprecedented performance on diverse language generation tasks.
Approach: They investigate the controllability of large language models on scientific summarization tasks by controlling stylistic and content coverage factors.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms humans on the MuP review generation task in terms of similarity to reference summaries and human preferences.
Exploring Graph Learning Tasks with Pure LLMs: A Comprehensive Benchmark and Investigation (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies focus on performance benchmarks without fully comparing LLMs to graph learning models.
Approach: They evaluate off-the-shelf and instruction-tuned graph learning models across a variety of scenarios.
Outcome: The proposed models outperform traditional graph learning models in few-shot settings, the authors show . their models out perform models with instruction tuning, and they show excellent generalization and robustness.
MM-LLMs: Recent Advances in MultiModal Large Language Models (2024.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: MultiModal Large Language Models (MM-LLMs) have undergone significant advances in the past year . traditional MM models incur substantial computational costs, especially when trained from scratch .
Approach: They propose a taxonomy encompassing 126 MM-LLMs and summarize key training recipes to enhance their potency.
Outcome: The proposed models preserve the reasoning and decision-making capabilities of LLMs and empower diverse range of MM tasks.
Is Translation All You Need? A Study on Solving Multilingual Tasks with Large Language Models (2025.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated multilingual capabilities, yet they are mostly English-centric due to the imbalanced training corpora.
Approach: They extend the evaluation to real-world user queries and non-English-centric LLMs . they show that translation into English can boost LLM performance on NLP tasks .
Outcome: The proposed evaluation extends to user queries and non-English-centric LLMs . it shows that translation into English can boost performance on NLP tasks, but not universally optimal .
Multilingual Large Language Models Are Not (Yet) Code-Switchers (2023.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing multilingual Large Language Models are not specifically trained with objectives for managing code-switching scenarios.
Approach: They propose to use multilingual Large Language Models to perform sentiment analysis, machine translation, summarization and word-level language identification to compare their performance to fine-tuned models of much smaller scales.
Outcome: The proposed models show that they underperform in comparison to fine-tuned models of much smaller scales.
Large Language Models are Not Yet Human-Level Evaluators for Abstractive Summarization (2023.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: ChatGPT and GPT-4 are popular as evaluation metric for complex generative tasks . however, they are not ready as human replacements due to significant limitations .
Approach: They conduct extensive analysis to examine the stability and reliability of LLMs as automatic evaluators for abstractive summarization.
Outcome: The proposed methods outperform the commonly used automatic metrics but are not ready for human evaluation due to significant limitations.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations