Distractor Generation for Fill-in-the-Blank Exercises by Question Type (2023.acl-srw)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies have generated words that are semantically similar to the correct words as distractors for fill-in-the-blank questions. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to automatically generate distractors for fill-in-the-blank questions in entrance examinations for Japanese universities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method is effective on 500 actual questions on English fill-in-the-blank questions in Japanese universities. |
Similar Papers
Distractor Generation in Multiple-Choice Tasks: A Survey of Methods, Datasets, and Evaluation (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Objective questions such as fill-in-the-blank and multiple-choice require examinees to select one valid answer from a set of invalid options. |
| Approach: | They examine distractor generation tasks, datasets, methods, and evaluation metrics for English objective questions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed task is based on fill-in-the-blank and multiple choice questions and is widely utilized in educational settings across various domains and subjects. |
Automatic Generation of Distractors for Fill-in-the-Blank Exercises with Round-Trip Neural Machine Translation (2022.acl-srw)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a fill-in-the-blank exercise involves removing one word from a sentence and generating distractors . a valid distractor is a word that does not fit the context, and distractors are invalid . |
| Approach: | They propose to automatically generate distractors using round-trip neural machine translation . they show that using hundreds of translations for a given sentence generates a rich set of distractors . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms two strong baselines against a real corpus of cloze exercises and manually checks for validity. |
Automatic Distractor Generation for Multiple Choice Questions in Standard Tests (2020.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to generate distractors for multiple choice questions are expensive and time-consuming. |
| Approach: | They propose a question and answer guided distractor generation framework to automate distractors generated by domain experts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing models and achieves state-of-the-art on a large-scale dataset. |
Exploring Automated Distractor Generation for Math Multiple-choice Questions via Large Language Models (2024.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
Wanyong Feng, Jaewook Lee, Hunter McNichols, Alexander Scarlatos, Digory Smith, Simon Woodhead, Nancy Ornelas, Andrew Lan
| Challenge: | Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are easy to administer and grade . but crafting high-quality distractors remains labor-intensive and limited scalability . |
| Approach: | They propose to automate the generation of distractors in math MCQs by using large language models to generate distractors. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods can generate valid distractors, but they are less adept at anticipating common errors or misconceptions among real students. |
DisGeM: Distractor Generation for Multiple Choice Questions with Span Masking (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multiple-choice cloze tests are a prevalent form of assessment that evaluates students' comprehension and inference abilities. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for distractor generation using readily available pre-trained language models . human evaluations confirm that their approach produces more effective distractors . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing methods without training or fine-tuning human evaluations confirm it. |
Distractor Generation Using Generative and Discriminative Capabilities of Transformer-based Models (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) are used to test language learners' comprehension and knowledge. |
| Approach: | They propose an automatic distractor generation approach which generates correct and incorrect answer options and then discriminates potential correct options from distractors. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms previous models on multiple choice questions and reading comprehension questions. |
Enhancing Distractor Generation for Multiple-Choice Questions with Retrieval Augmented Pretraining and Knowledge Graph Integration (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Han Cheng Yu, Yu An Shih, Kin Man Law, KaiYu Hsieh, Yu Chen Cheng, Hsin Chih Ho, Zih An Lin, Wen-Chuan Hsu, Yao-Chung Fan
| Challenge: | Existing LMs undergo task-agnostic pertaining, but task-specific pretraining has gained prominence. |
| Approach: | They propose retrieval augmented pretraining and task-specific pretraining for DG . they propose to refine language model pretraining to align it more closely with downstream task . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves the performance of multiple-choice questions by integrating knowledge graphs and language models. |
Fine-Tuning Encoder-Decoder Models with Contrastive Learning for In-Context Distractor Generation (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Elaf Alhazmi, Quan Z. Sheng, Wei Emma Zhang, Mohammed I. Thanoon, Haojie Zhuang, Behnaz Soltani, Munazza Zaib
| Challenge: | Distractors are used to generate plausible but incorrect options for fill-in-the-blank questions . research studies focus on fine-tuning pre-trained models with data augmentation techniques to generate distractors . |
| Approach: | They propose a model that trains the model to recognize essential semantic features necessary to generate distractors. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing models on two public datasets. |
Quiz Design Task: Helping Teachers Create Quizzes with Automated Question Generation (2022.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Question generation models are often evaluated with standardized NLG metrics that are based on n-gram overlap. |
| Approach: | They propose to use QGen to help teachers automate the generation of reading comprehension quizzes by comparing n-gram overlap with BLEU to compare system-generated questions with heldout human-written references. |
| Outcome: | The best model had only 68.4% of its questions accepted by the ten teachers who participated in the study. |
Difficulty-Controllable Cloze Question Distractor Generation (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for generating high-quality distractors lack adaptability and control over difficulty levels. |
| Approach: | They propose a two-way distractor generation process to generate plausible distractors using an ensemble QA system and a multitask learning strategy to train a difficulty-controllable generation model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method significantly outperforms GPT-4o in aligning distractor difficulty with human perception. |