Do Models Really Learn to Follow Instructions? An Empirical Study of Instruction Tuning (2023.acl-short)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies on instruction tuning (IT) have achieved great performance with zero-shot generalizability to unseen tasks. |
| Approach: | They analyze how models utilize instructions during IT by comparing model training with altered vs. original instructions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms naive models in low resource setting. |
Similar Papers
Do Prompt-Based Models Really Understand the Meaning of Their Prompts? (2022.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies show that prompts help models to learn faster in the same way that humans learn faster when provided with task instructions expressed in natural language. |
| Approach: | They experiment with 30 prompts manually written for natural language inference (NLI) they find that models can learn just as fast with many irrelevant or pathologically misleading prompts . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can learn as fast with irrelevant or pathologically misleading prompts as with instructively “good” prompts. |
Improving Instruct Models for Free: A Study on Partial Adaptation (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Ozan Irsoy, Pengxiang Cheng, Jennifer L Chen, Daniel Preotiuc-Pietro, Shiyue Zhang, Duccio Pappadopulo
| Challenge: | Instruct models are deemed superior and more usable but can be eroded by instruction tuning . a recent study shows that instruct models are better at following instructions than base models . |
| Approach: | They scale down the strength of instruction tuning to improve model performance . they show that reducing instruction tuning results in material improvement . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves on a few-shot in-context learning benchmark . but it loses some degree of its in-training ability . |
Fine-Tuning Large Language Models with Sequential Instructions (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing instruction-tuned models struggle to adhere to a query with multiple intentions, which impairs their performance when the completion of several tasks is demanded by a single command. |
| Approach: | They develop an automatic process that turns existing data into diverse and complex task chains and a new benchmark to evaluate a model’s ability to follow all the instructions in a sequence. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can follow instructions better and deliver higher results in coding, maths, and open-ended generation. |
Multi-Task Transfer Matters During Instruction-Tuning (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Instruction-tuning improves a model’s ability to learn in-context, but the mechanisms that drive in-constext learning are poorly understood. |
| Approach: | They propose to train a model on hundreds of tasks to improve its ability to learn in-context. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods improve model transfer and in-context generalization, suggesting catastrophic forgetting may impact in-constext learning. |
Chasing Random: Instruction Selection Strategies Fail to Generalize (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Prior work has shown that language models can be tuned to follow user instructions using only a small set of high-quality instructions. |
| Approach: | They analyze popular selection strategies across different datasets and benchmarks to find out whether they generalize poorly. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods outperform random baselines and cost-performance trade-offs on the full dataset and a random subset. |
Advancing Language Models through Instruction Tuning: Recent Progress and Challenges (2025.emnlp-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | tutorial addresses three critical questions within the field of instruction tuning: (1) What are the current focal points in instruction tuning research? (2) What are best practices in training an instruction-following model? (3) What new challenges have emerged? |
| Approach: | This tutorial presents a systematic overview of recent advances in instruction tuning. |
| Outcome: | The tutorial covers different stages in model training: supervised fine-tuning, preference optimization, and reinforcement learning. |
Instruction Matters: A Simple yet Effective Task Selection for Optimized Instruction Tuning of Specific Tasks (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Experimental results show that instruction tuning improves zero-shot generalization across various tasks and improves performance of specific tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a task selection method that leverages instruction information alone to identify relevant tasks and optimize instruction tuning for specific tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method is significantly more efficient than traditional approaches, which require complex measurements of pairwise transferability between tasks or the creation of data samples for the target task. |
The Right Time Matters: Data Arrangement Affects Zero-Shot Generalization in Instruction Tuning (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Bingxiang He, Ning Ding, Cheng Qian, Jia Deng, Ganqu Cui, Lifan Yuan, Haiwen Hong, Huan-ang Gao, Longtao Huang, Hui Xue, Huimin Chen, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun
| Challenge: | Existing work on instruction tuning has focused on task level, without considering that tasks are artificially defined and, to LLMs, merely consist of tokens and representations. |
| Approach: | They propose a training data arrangement framework that allows for continual learning and loss reduction. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework promotes continual learning and loss reduction on unseen tasks. |
Demystifying Instruction Mixing for Fine-tuning Large Language Models (2024.acl-srw)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Instruction tuning is effective for aligning large language models with human instructions, but the procedure to optimizing the mixing of instruction datasets is still unclear. |
| Approach: | They categorize instructions into three primary types: NLP downstream tasks, coding, and general chat. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves performance of large language models (LLMs) but it is difficult to combine different instruction datasets to optimize overall performance. |
Instruction Tuning with and without Context: Behavioral Shifts and Downstream Impact (2026.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Hyunji Lee, Seunghyun Yoon, Yunjae Won, Hanseok Oh, Geewook Kim, Trung Bui, Franck Dernoncourt, Elias Stengel-Eskin, Mohit Bansal, Minjoon Seo
| Challenge: | Prior work on instruction tuning datasets combined these data types without examining their distinct effects. |
| Approach: | They investigate how training LLMs with or without context affects model behavior and performance . they find that using context-augmented data as the backbone for vision-language models reduces hallucination . |
| Outcome: | The proposed training with context-augmented data reduces hallucination and improves grounding in the visual domain. |