Chasing Random: Instruction Selection Strategies Fail to Generalize (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Prior work has shown that language models can be tuned to follow user instructions using only a small set of high-quality instructions. |
| Approach: | They analyze popular selection strategies across different datasets and benchmarks to find out whether they generalize poorly. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods outperform random baselines and cost-performance trade-offs on the full dataset and a random subset. |
Similar Papers
Demystifying Instruction Mixing for Fine-tuning Large Language Models (2024.acl-srw)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Instruction tuning is effective for aligning large language models with human instructions, but the procedure to optimizing the mixing of instruction datasets is still unclear. |
| Approach: | They categorize instructions into three primary types: NLP downstream tasks, coding, and general chat. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves performance of large language models (LLMs) but it is difficult to combine different instruction datasets to optimize overall performance. |
Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning: Is There An Optimal Subset of Parameters to Tune? (2024.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent research has illuminated the possibility of selective parameter-efficient fine-tuning, which retains the inference speed of the original model and comes at no additional computational cost. |
| Approach: | They propose to selectively update only a small subset of parameters during the fine-tuning process, keeping the remaining parameters frozen during training. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods retain the inference speed of the original model and come at no additional computational cost. |
Unveiling the Generalization Power of Fine-Tuned Large Language Models (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional multitasking abilities, but the comprehensive effects of fine-tuning on the LLMs’ generalization ability are not fully understood. |
| Approach: | They conduct extensive experiments across five distinct language tasks on different datasets to investigate whether fine-tuning affects the generalization ability intrinsic to LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can generalize to different domains and tasks by integrating the in-context learning strategy during fine-tuning on generation tasks. |
Rethinking Data Selection at Scale: Random Selection is Almost All You Need (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing data selection techniques are designed for small data pools, a study finds . filtering data by token length is an efficient method for improving results . |
| Approach: | They use self-scoring methods that do not rely on external help to perform fine-tuning . they also find that filtering data by token length offers a stable and efficient method . |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods outperform random selection on large datasets on large data pools. |
Take the essence and discard the dross: A Rethinking on Data Selection for Fine-Tuning Large Language Models (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies focus on data selection but lack a clear, unified framework . variability in experimental settings complicates systematic comparisons . |
| Approach: | They propose a three-stage scheme to standardize data selection for fine-tuning large language models . they propose unified comparison approach that incorporates ratio-based efficiency and ranking-based feasibility metrics to address inconsistencies across experiments. |
| Outcome: | The proposed scheme outperforms existing methods in a dozen key studies and identifies key challenges. |
Do Models Really Learn to Follow Instructions? An Empirical Study of Instruction Tuning (2023.acl-short)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies on instruction tuning (IT) have achieved great performance with zero-shot generalizability to unseen tasks. |
| Approach: | They analyze how models utilize instructions during IT by comparing model training with altered vs. original instructions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms naive models in low resource setting. |
Smaller Language Models are capable of selecting Instruction-Tuning Training Data for Larger Language Models (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Instruction tuning language models can be expensive and expensive to train . current methods require extensive training on large datasets, resulting in high training costs. |
| Approach: | They propose a novel approach to selecting training data based on the learning percentage of the samples. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs better on models ranging from 1B to 13B in size compared to training on the entire dataset. |
Instruction Matters: A Simple yet Effective Task Selection for Optimized Instruction Tuning of Specific Tasks (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Experimental results show that instruction tuning improves zero-shot generalization across various tasks and improves performance of specific tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a task selection method that leverages instruction information alone to identify relevant tasks and optimize instruction tuning for specific tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method is significantly more efficient than traditional approaches, which require complex measurements of pairwise transferability between tasks or the creation of data samples for the target task. |
Fine-Tuning Large Language Models with Sequential Instructions (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing instruction-tuned models struggle to adhere to a query with multiple intentions, which impairs their performance when the completion of several tasks is demanded by a single command. |
| Approach: | They develop an automatic process that turns existing data into diverse and complex task chains and a new benchmark to evaluate a model’s ability to follow all the instructions in a sequence. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can follow instructions better and deliver higher results in coding, maths, and open-ended generation. |
From Selection to Refinement: Iterative Optimization for Instruction Data (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Hang Hu, Ziyan Liu, Rujie Wen, Ruihui Hou, Xueyan Wu, Mu Zhang, Jianxing Yu, Tong Ruan, Jingping Liu
| Challenge: | Existing methods to optimize instruction tuning datasets face two main challenges: unreasonable pruning of potentially valuable low-quality data and the persistence of noise or semantic drift during revision. |
| Approach: | They propose an automated iterative framework for instruction data optimization that prunes low-quality data and refines low quality data using feedback-driven iteration. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms state-of-the-art methods on seven public benchmark datasets with high data efficiency. |