Challenge: Instruct models are deemed superior and more usable but can be eroded by instruction tuning . a recent study shows that instruct models are better at following instructions than base models .
Approach: They scale down the strength of instruction tuning to improve model performance . they show that reducing instruction tuning results in material improvement .
Outcome: The proposed model improves on a few-shot in-context learning benchmark . but it loses some degree of its in-training ability .

Similar Papers

Do Models Really Learn to Follow Instructions? An Empirical Study of Instruction Tuning (2023.acl-short)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies on instruction tuning (IT) have achieved great performance with zero-shot generalizability to unseen tasks.
Approach: They analyze how models utilize instructions during IT by comparing model training with altered vs. original instructions.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms naive models in low resource setting.
Multi-Task Transfer Matters During Instruction-Tuning (2024.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Instruction-tuning improves a model’s ability to learn in-context, but the mechanisms that drive in-constext learning are poorly understood.
Approach: They propose to train a model on hundreds of tasks to improve its ability to learn in-context.
Outcome: The proposed methods improve model transfer and in-context generalization, suggesting catastrophic forgetting may impact in-constext learning.
Few-shot Fine-tuning vs. In-context Learning: A Fair Comparison and Evaluation (2023.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies show that in-context learning and few-shot fine-tuning can generalize well out-of-domain.
Approach: They compare few-shot fine-tuning and in-context learning for task adaptation . they find that both approaches generalize similarly, but exhibit large variation .
Outcome: The proposed methods outperform in-context learning and few-shot fine-tuning with OPT models of different sizes.
Ensemble-Instruct: Instruction Tuning Data Generation with a Heterogeneous Mixture of LMs (2023.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Empirical studies with different instruction-tuned LMs show that our proposed method yields higher-quality instruction tuning data than Self-Instruct.
Approach: They propose to use in-context learning techniques to train strong conversational agents . they propose to categorize and simplify ICL templates to make prompt learning easier .
Outcome: Empirical results show that the proposed method yields higher-quality instruction tuning data than Self-Instruct and improves performance of both vanilla and instruction-tuned LMs.
How Does In-Context Learning Help Prompt Tuning? (2024.findings-eacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a growing number of parameter-efficient adaptation methods are needed to fine-tune large language models.
Approach: They propose a method that combines prompt tuning and in-context learning to improve prompt tuning by concatenating a natural language demonstration with learned prompt embeddings.
Outcome: The proposed method outperforms prompt tuning and prompt tuning on five language generation tasks.
Deeper Insights Without Updates: The Power of In-Context Learning Over Fine-Tuning (2024.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Fine-tuning and in-context learning are two prevalent methods in imbuing large language models with task-specific knowledge.
Approach: They propose to use a circuit shift theory to explain why in-context learning is superior to fine-tuning for tasks with implicit patterns.
Outcome: The proposed method can grasp deep patterns and significantly improve accuracy on implicit patterns, compared with fine-tuning and in-context learning.
Large Language Models are Miscalibrated In-Context Learners (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: In-context Learning and Supervised Fine-Tuning have emerged as pre-dominant methodologies for machine learning and NLP.
Approach: They propose to use self-ensembling to improve both performance and calibration of language models.
Outcome: The proposed learning paradigms can achieve better calibration and better performance than the previous learning paradigm.
Revealing the Inherent Instructability of Pre-Trained Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Pre-trained large language models perform multitask learning during their pre-training . a new technique, Response Tuning, removes the instruction and its corresponding mapping to the response from instruction tuning.
Approach: They propose a method which removes the instruction and its mapping to the response from instruction tuning.
Outcome: The proposed model can respond to a wide range of instructions . it can recognize and reject unsafe queries after learning from response data.
Rethinking the Role of Scale for In-Context Learning: An Interpretability-based Case Study at 66 Billion Scale (2023.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: 70% of attention heads and 20% of the feed forward networks can be removed with minimal decline in task performance.
Approach: They propose to investigate whether in-context learning is not uniform across all components of a large language model.
Outcome: The proposed model can remove 70% of attention heads and 20% of feed forward networks with minimal decline in task performance.
InstructDial: Improving Zero and Few-shot Generalization in Dialogue through Instruction Tuning (2022.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Instruction tuning is emerging in NLP, but has not been explored for dialogue-related tasks.
Approach: They propose an instruction tuning framework for dialogue that leverages natural language instructions with language models to induce zero-shot generalization on unseen tasks.
Outcome: The proposed framework enables good zero-shot performance on unseen datasets and tasks such as dialogue evaluation and intent detection.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations