Challenge: Existing metrics for assessing question generation fail to take into account the input context of generation.
Approach: They propose a context-aware Relevance evaluation metric for Question Generation that takes into account the context of question generation into account.
Outcome: The proposed metric achieves higher correlation with human judgments while being much more robust to adversarial samples.

Similar Papers

Evaluation of Question Generation Needs More References (2023.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing evaluations of QG methods rely on single reference-based similarity metrics . multiple (pseudo) references are more effective for QG evaluation .
Approach: They propose to paraphrase the reference question for a more robust QG evaluation.
Outcome: The proposed frameworks show higher correlation with human evaluations than evaluation with a single reference.
Reference-based Metrics Disprove Themselves in Question Generation (2024.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing metrics for question generation are based on human-written references . however, the results of the metrics on our study disprove the metrics themselves .
Approach: They propose to use human-written references to evaluate question generation . they propose to combine criteria such as naturalness, answerability, and complexity .
Outcome: The proposed model is based on multi-dimensional criteria such as naturalness, answerability, and complexity, utilizing large language models.
RQUGE: Reference-Free Metric for Evaluating Question Generation by Answering the Question (2023.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing metrics for evaluating the quality of automatically generated questions are expensive and penalise valid questions that may not have high lexical or semantic similarity to the reference questions.
Approach: They propose a question-answering and span scorer metric based on the answerability of the candidate question given the context.
Outcome: The proposed metric has higher correlation with human judgment without relying on the reference question.
QGEval: Benchmarking Multi-dimensional Evaluation for Question Generation (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing metrics fail to align well with human judgments when evaluating QG questions.
Approach: They propose a multi-dimensional evaluation benchmark for QG and automatic metrics that evaluates questions and automated metrics across 7 dimensions.
Outcome: The proposed benchmark evaluates QG models and automatic metrics across 7 dimensions . it shows that most QG model performs unsatisfactorily in terms of answerability and answer consistency .
CausalScore: An Automatic Reference-Free Metric for Assessing Response Relevance in Open-Domain Dialogue Systems (2025.coling-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing metrics for dialogue quality evaluation show low correlation with human judgements . current metrics do not accurately evaluate dialogue responses based on dialogue history .
Approach: They propose a new metric measuring causal strength between dialogue histories and responses . they collect a dialogue dataset with human-annotated causal relations and pairwise human judgements .
Outcome: The proposed metric outperforms existing state-of-the-art metrics in human judgements . it is based on a dialogue dataset with human-annotated causal relations and human judgement sets .
Q2: Evaluating Factual Consistency in Knowledge-Grounded Dialogues via Question Generation and Question Answering (2021.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing evaluation methods for factual consistency in knowledge-grounded dialogues are unreliable and limit their applicability.
Approach: They propose an automatic evaluation metric for factual consistency in knowledge-grounded dialogue using automatic question generation and question answering.
Outcome: The proposed evaluation metric consistently shows higher correlation with human judgements.
Leveraging Context Information for Natural Question Generation (N18-2)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing work for natural question generation ignores the input passage or hard-codes answer positions.
Approach: They propose a model that matches the answer with the passage before generating a question.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms the state-of-the-art model using rich features.
Exploring Question-Specific Rewards for Generating Deep Questions (2020.coling-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent question generation approaches use the sequence-to-sequence framework to optimize the log likelihood of ground-truth questions using teacher forcing.
Approach: They propose to optimize for QG-specific objectives via reinforcement learning to improve question quality.
Outcome: The proposed model improves the fluency, relevance, and answerability of generated questions.
Towards a Better Metric for Evaluating Question Generation Systems (D18-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing evaluation metrics based on n-gram similarity do not correlate well with human judgments . large datasets for document Question Answering (QA) have enabled the development of end-to-end supervised models .
Approach: They propose a scoring function to capture answerability of questions . they also integrate existing similarity metrics into the scoring function .
Outcome: The proposed scoring function improves human judgments on question answerability . the proposed scoring functions are made publicly available .
Improving Question Generation With to the Point Context (D19-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing sequence-to-sequence neural models may not be able to identify answer-relevant context words for question generation.
Approach: They propose to model the unstructured sentence and the structured answer-relevant relation for question generation by combining to the point context and unstructure.
Outcome: Experiments show that the proposed model improves on the unstructured sentence and the structured answer-relevant relation.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations