Challenge: Existing metrics for dialogue quality evaluation show low correlation with human judgements . current metrics do not accurately evaluate dialogue responses based on dialogue history .
Approach: They propose a new metric measuring causal strength between dialogue histories and responses . they collect a dialogue dataset with human-annotated causal relations and pairwise human judgements .
Outcome: The proposed metric outperforms existing state-of-the-art metrics in human judgements . it is based on a dialogue dataset with human-annotated causal relations and human judgement sets .

Similar Papers

Learning an Unreferenced Metric for Online Dialogue Evaluation (2020.acl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing tools for dialogue evaluation do not generalize to unseen datasets and/or need a human-generated reference response during inference.
Approach: They propose an unreferenced automated dialogue evaluation metric that uses large pre-trained language models to extract latent representations of utterances and leverages the temporal transitions that exist between them.
Outcome: The proposed model achieves higher correlation with human annotations in an online setting, while not requiring true responses for comparison during inference.
GRADE: Automatic Graph-Enhanced Coherence Metric for Evaluating Open-Domain Dialogue Systems (2020.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing evaluation metrics only consider surface features or utterance-level semantics, without explicitly considering the fine-grained topic transition dynamics of dialogue flows.
Approach: They propose a graph-enhanced evaluation metric GRADE to evaluate dialogue coherence . GRADE incorporates utterance-level contextualized representations and fine-grained topic-level graph representations to improve communication logic.
Outcome: The proposed evaluation metric outperforms state-of-the-art metrics on measuring diverse dialogue models in terms of Pearson and Spearman correlations with human judgments.
Achieving Reliable Human Assessment of Open-Domain Dialogue Systems (2022.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Evaluation of open-domain dialogue systems is challenging and unreliable . human evaluation of live conversations is highly reliable, but reliability cannot be assumed .
Approach: They propose a method of open-domain dialogue evaluation that is highly reliable . they compare live conversations with models that avoid pre-created reference dialogues .
Outcome: The proposed method is highly reliable while remaining feasible and low cost.
Towards Holistic and Automatic Evaluation of Open-Domain Dialogue Generation (2020.acl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods of open-domain dialogue evaluation are labor-intensive and inefficient.
Approach: They propose to use open-domain dialogues to evaluate different aspects of dialogues using holistic evaluation metrics.
Outcome: The proposed metrics show strong correlations with human judgments.
Deconstruct to Reconstruct a Configurable Evaluation Metric for Open-Domain Dialogue Systems (2020.coling-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing evaluation metrics are not designed to cope with this flexibility.
Approach: They propose to group the qualities into three groups to obtain a single metric called USL-H.
Outcome: The proposed metric achieves good correlations with human judgment and maintains its configurability towards different aspects and metrics.
QRelScore: Better Evaluating Generated Questions with Deeper Understanding of Context-aware Relevance (2022.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing metrics for assessing question generation fail to take into account the input context of generation.
Approach: They propose a context-aware Relevance evaluation metric for Question Generation that takes into account the context of question generation into account.
Outcome: The proposed metric achieves higher correlation with human judgments while being much more robust to adversarial samples.
FineD-Eval: Fine-grained Automatic Dialogue-Level Evaluation (2022.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent model-based reference-free metrics for open-domain dialogue evaluation lack correlations with human judgment and poor interpretability.
Approach: They propose a multi-dimensional dialogue-level metric with three sub-metrics targeting a specific dimension.
Outcome: The proposed metric outperforms existing models and sub-metrics in three high-quality dialogue evaluation benchmarks.
Designing Precise and Robust Dialogue Response Evaluators (2020.acl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing automated dialogue response evaluators have only moderate correlation with human judgement and are not robust.
Approach: They propose to build a reference-free dialogue response evaluator that exploits the power of semi-supervised training and pretrained (masked) language models.
Outcome: The proposed model achieves strong correlation with human judgement and generalizes robustly to diverse responses and corpora.
What is wrong with you?: Leveraging User Sentiment for Automatic Dialog Evaluation (2022.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing metrics for dialog evaluation are trained on human annotations, which is cumbersome to collect.
Approach: They propose to use user sentiment and other information as proxy to measure the quality of previous dialogs.
Outcome: The proposed model is comparable to models trained on human annotated data.
DiscoScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT and Discourse Coherence (2023.eacl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: DiscoScore is a parametrized discourse metric that uses BERT to model discourse coherence . it is weak when operated at system level, and is therefore not reliable in a way to spot improvements .
Approach: They propose a parametrized discourse metric which uses BERT to model discourse coherence from different perspectives.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms existing models on document-level machine translation and summarization.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations