Challenge: Existing n-gram similarity metrics fail to discriminate the incorrect answers due to the free-form of the answer.
Approach: They propose a new metric that assigns different weights to each token via keyphrase prediction to judge the correctness of GenQA.
Outcome: The proposed metric has a significantly higher correlation with human judgments than existing metrics in various datasets.

Similar Papers

Towards a Better Metric for Evaluating Question Generation Systems (D18-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing evaluation metrics based on n-gram similarity do not correlate well with human judgments . large datasets for document Question Answering (QA) have enabled the development of end-to-end supervised models .
Approach: They propose a scoring function to capture answerability of questions . they also integrate existing similarity metrics into the scoring function .
Outcome: The proposed scoring function improves human judgments on question answerability . the proposed scoring functions are made publicly available .
PeerQA: A Scientific Question Answering Dataset from Peer Reviews (2025.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a dataset of 579 QA pairs from 208 scientific articles contains answers that reviewers raised while thoroughly examining the scientific article.
Approach: They propose a dataset that contains questions that reviewers raised while thoroughly examining the scientific article.
Outcome: The proposed dataset contains 579 QA pairs from 208 academic articles . the results show that decontextualization approaches improve retrieval performance .
ComQA: A Community-sourced Dataset for Complex Factoid Question Answering with Paraphrase Clusters (N19-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: ComQA dataset captures question phenomena and the diverse ways in which they are formulated.
Approach: They propose a large dataset of real user questions that captures question phenomena and the diverse ways in which they are formulated.
Outcome: The proposed dataset can be a driver of future research on factoid question answering (QA).
KPEval: Towards Fine-Grained Semantic-Based Keyphrase Evaluation (2024.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing evaluation methods for keyphrase extraction and generation rely on exact matching with human references.
Approach: They propose a framework for evaluation that includes four critical aspects: reference agreement, faithfulness, diversity, utility and semantic-based metrics.
Outcome: The proposed evaluation framework correlates better with human preferences than previously proposed metrics.
Reference-based Metrics Disprove Themselves in Question Generation (2024.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing metrics for question generation are based on human-written references . however, the results of the metrics on our study disprove the metrics themselves .
Approach: They propose to use human-written references to evaluate question generation . they propose to combine criteria such as naturalness, answerability, and complexity .
Outcome: The proposed model is based on multi-dimensional criteria such as naturalness, answerability, and complexity, utilizing large language models.
Keyphrase Generation with Fine-Grained Evaluation-Guided Reinforcement Learning (2021.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing KG evaluation metrics are only aware of the exact correctness of predictions on phrase-level and ignore semantic similarities between similar predictions and targets, which inhibits the model from learning deep linguistic patterns.
Approach: They propose a fine-grained evaluation metric to improve the previous KG framework . the evaluation metrics are only aware of the exact correctness of predictions on phrase-level .
Outcome: The proposed method outperforms the existing frameworks among all evaluation scores.
‘Just because you are right, doesn’t mean I am wrong’: Overcoming a bottleneck in development and evaluation of Open-Ended VQA tasks (2021.eacl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing visual question answering datasets assume only one ground truth answer for each question.
Approach: They propose alternative answer sets (AAS) of ground-truth answers to address this limitation . they modify top VQA solvers to support multiple plausible answers for a question .
Outcome: The proposed approach improves on the GQA dataset and shows that it is more efficient than previous approaches.
RQUGE: Reference-Free Metric for Evaluating Question Generation by Answering the Question (2023.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing metrics for evaluating the quality of automatically generated questions are expensive and penalise valid questions that may not have high lexical or semantic similarity to the reference questions.
Approach: They propose a question-answering and span scorer metric based on the answerability of the candidate question given the context.
Outcome: The proposed metric has higher correlation with human judgment without relying on the reference question.
RoMQA: A Benchmark for Robust, Multi-evidence, Multi-answer Question Answering (2023.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing QA models are not robust to variations in question constraints, but can be made more robust by tuning on clusters of related questions.
Approach: They introduce RoMQA, the first benchmark for robust, multi-evidence, multianswer question answering (QA) RoMQ contains clusters of related questions that are derived from the Wikidata knowledge graph .
Outcome: The proposed model is the first benchmark for robust, multi-evidence, multianswer question answering (QA) compared to prior QA datasets, it has more human-written questions that require reasoning over more evidence text and have, on average, many more correct answers.
DecompEval: Evaluating Generated Texts as Unsupervised Decomposed Question Answering (2023.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing evaluation metrics for natural language generation (NLG) tasks face the challenges on generalization ability and interpretability.
Approach: They propose a metric that evaluates natural language generation tasks as an instruction-style question answering task and utilizes instruction-tuned pre-trained language models without training on evaluation datasets.
Outcome: The proposed metric achieves state-of-the-art performance in untrained metrics for evaluating text summarization and dialogue generation, which exhibits strong dimension-level / task-level generalization ability and interpretability.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations