Corpus for Modeling User Interactions in Online Persuasive Discussions (2020.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Several studies have focused on the identification and classification of argumentative components and the argumentative relations between the components. |
| Approach: | They propose an annotation scheme and corpus that captures user-generated inner-post arguments and inter-post relations between users in ChangeMyView. |
| Outcome: | The proposed annotation scheme captures user-generated inner-post arguments and inter-post relations in ChangeMyView, a persuasive forum. |
Similar Papers
Annotating and Analyzing Semantic Role of Elementary Units and Relations in Online Persuasive Arguments (P19-2)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on the features of persuasiveness focus on lexical features and argumentative features. |
| Approach: | They propose an annotation scheme that captures the semantic role of arguments in a popular online persuasion forum, ChangeMyView. |
| Outcome: | The proposed scheme captures the semantic role of arguments in a popular online persuasion forum, so-called ChangeMyView. |
A Multi-layer Annotated Corpus of Argumentative Text: From Argument Schemes to Discourse Relations (L18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent interest in Argumentation Mining has brought to the fore the need for corpora annotated with argument information, which can be used as training data. |
| Approach: | They propose a set of guidelines for the annotation of argument schemes and a new annotation tool for the 'inferential' argument schemes. |
| Outcome: | The proposed corpus includes 112 argumentative microtexts and a new annotation tool. |
Unveiling the Power of Argument Arrangement in Online Persuasive Discussions (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a recent study shows that the CMV is the best time period in human history for the vast majority of people. |
| Approach: | They extend a semantic argumentation unit type model by clustering type sequences into different argument arrangement patterns and representing discussions as sequences of these patterns. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing classifiers on the change my view forum discussion data. |
A Corpus for Modeling User and Language Effects in Argumentation on Online Debating (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing argumentation datasets have allowed only limited assessment of "user" traits because information on background of users is generally unavailable. |
| Approach: | They present a dataset of 78,376 debates generated over a 10-year period along with surprisingly comprehensive participant profiles. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset includes 78,376 debates generated over a 10-year period along with comprehensive participant profiles. |
A Corpus for Argumentative Writing Support in German (2020.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In today's world most information is readily available. Consequently, the sole reproduction of information is losing attention. |
| Approach: | They propose an annotation approach to capture claims and premises of arguments and their relations in student-written peer reviews on business models in german language. |
| Outcome: | The proposed annotation scheme guides annotators to moderate agreement with the proposed scheme on 50 persuasive student-written peer reviews on business models. |
AMPERSAND: Argument Mining for PERSuAsive oNline Discussions (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Argument mining is a field of corpus-based discourse analysis that involves the automatic identification of argumentative structures in text. |
| Approach: | They propose a computational model for argument mining in online persuasive discussion forums that brings together the micro-level (argument as product) and macro-level models of argumentation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves on existing models using pointer networks and a pre-trained language model. |
Give Me More Feedback: Annotating Argument Persuasiveness and Related Attributes in Student Essays (P18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work on automated essay scoring has focused on holistic scoring, which summarizes the quality of an essay with a single score. |
| Approach: | They present a corpus of essays simultaneously annotated with argument components, argument persuasiveness scores, and attributes of argument components that impact an argument’s persuasiveness. |
| Outcome: | The proposed corpus could trigger the development of novel computational models that provide useful feedback to students on why their arguments are (un)persuasive . |
The Discussion Tracker Corpus of Collaborative Argumentation (2020.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | The Discussion Tracker corpus is an annotated dataset of transcripts of spoken, multi-party argumentation transcribed from 985 minutes of audio . |
| Approach: | They analyze 29 multi-party arguments transcribed from 985 minutes of audio . they provide descriptive statistics and code for predicting each dimension separately. |
| Outcome: | The Discussion Tracker corpus was collected in high school English classes and annotated for argument moves, specificity, specificities and collaboration dimensions. |
Annotating Arguments in a Corpus of Opinion Articles (2022.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
Gil Rocha, Luís Trigo, Henrique Lopes Cardoso, Rui Sousa-Silva, Paula Carvalho, Bruno Martins, Miguel Won
| Challenge: | Argument annotation is the process of exposing and justifying one's points of view, with the aim of conveying a logical reasoning through a set of semantically related propositions. |
| Approach: | They propose to use argumentative discourse units to annotate arguments in Portuguese using a multi-layered process to analyze the annotations produced. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model exploits the best practices identified in previous studies while fostering the potential use of the resulting annotated corpus for new purposes. |
Modeling Persuasive Discourse to Adaptively Support Students’ Argumentative Writing (2022.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Argumentation is an omnipresent rudiment of daily communication and thinking . humans struggle to develop argumentation skills due to a lack of individual and instant feedback in their learning process. |
| Approach: | They propose an argumentation annotation approach to model argumentative discourse in student-written business model pitches and embed it into an adaptive writing support system for students that provides individual argumentation feedback. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method annotates a corpus of 200 business model pitches in german and measures their self-efficacy and ease-of-use in a real-world writing exercise. |