| Challenge: | Existing evaluation metrics focus on content selection, not linguistic quality . proposed GRUEN measures Grammaticality, non-redundancy, focUs, structure and coherence of generated text. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a BERT-based model and a class of syntactic, semantic, and contextual features to examine the system output. |
| Outcome: | Experiments show that the proposed metric correlates highly with human judgments. |
Similar Papers
A Tutorial on Evaluation Metrics used in Natural Language Generation (2021.naacl-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | This tutorial presents the evolution of automatic evaluation metrics to their current state along with emerging trends in this field. |
| Approach: | This tutorial presents the evolution of automatic evaluation metrics to their current state . it aims to assess the extent of scientific progress made and identify areas/components that need improvement . |
| Outcome: | This tutorial presents the evolution of automatic evaluation metrics to their current state along with emerging trends in this field. |
Curious Case of Language Generation Evaluation Metrics: A Cautionary Tale (2020.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a few popular metrics are still used to evaluate language generation systems despite their known limitations. |
| Approach: | They propose to use automatic metrics to evaluate language generation systems . they show that they prefer system outputs to human-authored texts . |
| Outcome: | The proposed metrics are insensitive to correct translations of rare words and can yield high scores when given a single sentence as system output for the entire test set. |
On the Limitations of Reference-Free Evaluations of Generated Text (2022.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a recent study has shown that evaluation metrics which accurately estimate the quality of generated text are limited in their ability to evaluate generated text. |
| Approach: | They argue that reference-free metrics are limited in their ability to evaluate generated text . they recommend that they be used as diagnostic tools for analyzing and understanding model behavior . |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation metrics are limited in their ability to evaluate generated text . they can be optimized at test time, can be biased against models with similar outputs . |
On the Blind Spots of Model-Based Evaluation Metrics for Text Generation (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for text generation evaluation metrics are lacking in robustness analysis. |
| Approach: | They propose to use stress tests to test for errors in text generation evaluation metrics . they find that BERTScore is confused by truncation errors in summarization . |
| Outcome: | The proposed stress tests show that they are insensitive to errors in open-ended generation, translation, and summarization. |
Leveraging Large Language Models for NLG Evaluation: Advances and Challenges (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | introducing Large Language Models (LLMs) has opened new avenues for assessing generated content quality, e.g., coherence, creativity, and context relevance. |
| Approach: | They propose a taxonomy for organizing existing LLM-based evaluation metrics and a structured framework to understand and compare them. |
| Outcome: | The proposed taxonomy offers a framework to understand and compare LLM-based evaluation methods. |
A Human Evaluation of AMR-to-English Generation Systems (2020.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a recent human evaluation of AMR generation systems is compared to automated metrics. |
| Approach: | They propose a human evaluation which collects fluency and adequacy scores and categorization of error types for AMR generation systems. |
| Outcome: | The results show that human evaluations are more nuanced than automated metrics. |
BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generation (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Text generation has made significant advances, but evaluation metrics have lagged behind. |
| Approach: | They propose a learning evaluation metric for English based on BERT . BLEURT can model human judgment with a few thousand possibly biased training examples . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can model human judgment with a few thousand potentially biased training examples. |
HAUSER: Towards Holistic and Automatic Evaluation of Simile Generation (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Similes are a crucial part of creative writing, but there is still a lack of evaluation metrics for simile generation. |
| Approach: | They propose to use similes as a tool to evaluate simile generation metrics . they propose to combine five criteria and automatic metrics for each criterion . |
| Outcome: | The proposed metrics are significantly more correlated with human ratings from each perspective compared with prior automatic metrics. |
RoMe: A Robust Metric for Evaluating Natural Language Generation (2022.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Empirical results suggest that RoMe has a stronger correlation to human judgment over state-of-the-art metrics in evaluating system-generated sentences across several NLG tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose an automatic evaluation metric incorporating several core aspects of natural language understanding (language competence, syntactic and semantic variation). |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation metric is trained on language features such as semantic similarity combined with tree edit distance and grammatical acceptability, using a self-supervised neural network. |
Not All Errors are Equal: Learning Text Generation Metrics using Stratified Error Synthesis (2022.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing learning metrics are limited to tasks where large human ratings are available. |
| Approach: | They propose a model-based natural language generation (NLG) evaluation metric that is highly correlated with human judgements without requiring human annotation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed metric outperforms all prior unsupervised metrics on multiple NLG tasks including translation, image captioning, and WebNLG text generation. |