Papers by Yanxi Wu
One Cognitive Loop Is Enough: SODA unlocks Pure-Text Spatial Reasoning in Large Language Models (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Shunwen Bai, Jiahuan Zhang, Haoran Huang, Yurun Wang, Jiale Liu, Yanxi Wu, Ningzhe Yu, Yudong Gao, Mingjun Cheng
| Challenge: | Existing large language models (LLMs) lack visual input, leading to errors in basic numerical comparisons. |
| Approach: | They propose a spatial OODA framework that integrates the OODAC cognitive loop into multiple control tasks and integrates it into LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model significantly improves the spatial reasoning capabilities of large language models across multiple scenarios including SPOD-Bench, SPACE and applications. |
MemeReaCon: Probing Contextual Meme Understanding in Large Vision-Language Models (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Zhengyi Zhao, Shubo Zhang, Yuxi Zhang, Yanxi Zhao, Yifan Zhang, Zezhong Wang, Huimin Wang, Yutian Zhao, Bin Liang, Yefeng Zheng, Binyang Li, Kam-Fai Wong, Xian Wu
| Challenge: | Current approaches focus on isolated meme analysis, either for harmful content detection or standalone interpretation, overlooking a fundamental challenge: the same meme can express different intents depending on its conversational context. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate how large vision language models understand memes in their original context. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates how large vision language models understand meme intent in their original context. |
Inner Thinking Transformer: Leveraging Dynamic Depth Scaling to Foster Adaptive Internal Thinking (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yilong Chen, Junyuan Shang, Zhenyu Zhang, Yanxi Xie, Jiawei Sheng, Tingwen Liu, Shuohuan Wang, Yu Sun, Hua Wu, Haifeng Wang
| Challenge: | Large language models face inherent performance bottlenecks under parameter constraints . challenging tokens induce abrupt gradient spikes across layers, exposing stress points . |
| Approach: | They propose an inner thinking transformer that reimagines layer computations as implicit thinking steps. |
| Outcome: | Empirical results show that ITT outperforms Transformer/Loop variants in 11 benchmarks. |