Papers by Tianshuo Peng
Can Large Language Models Be Good Language Teachers? (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success across diverse domains, but their potential as effective language teachers remains inadequately assessed. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to evaluate Chinese language teachers' pedagogical competence against international standards. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework evaluates 13 latest multilingual and Chinese LLMs against international standards for Chinese language teachers. |
HiddenDetect: Detecting Jailbreak Attacks against Multimodal Large Language Models via Monitoring Hidden States (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies focus on posthoc alignment techniques, but the underlying safety mechanisms within LVLMs remain unexplored. |
| Approach: | They propose a tuning-free framework that leverages internal activations to enhance safety. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms state-of-the-art methods in detecting jailbreak attacks against large vision-language models. |
FSUIE: A Novel Fuzzy Span Mechanism for Universal Information Extraction (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing Universal Information Extraction models rely heavily on span boundaries in data during training, which does not reflect the reality of span annotation challenges. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that uses fuzzy spans to model various IE tasks . they propose generative Universal Information Extraction (UIE) to unify various ie tasks based on fuzzy span boundaries . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves on a series of main IE tasks with small amounts of data and training epochs. |
Exploring Reasoning Reward Model for Agents (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Kaixuan Fan, Kaituo Feng, Manyuan Zhang, Tianshuo Peng, Zhixun Li, Yilei Jiang, Shuang Chen, Xiangyu Yue
| Challenge: | Existing methods for agentic reinforcement learning rely on sparse outcome-based reward for training, leading to suboptimal results. |
| Approach: | They propose an agent-based reward model that produces structured feedback for agentic trajectories, including an explicit reasoning trace and a focused critique. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model produces structured feedback for agentic trajectories including an explicit reasoning trace, a focused critique, and an overall score that evaluates process performance. |