Kaixuan Fan, Kaituo Feng, Manyuan Zhang, Tianshuo Peng, Zhixun Li, Yilei Jiang, Shuang Chen, Xiangyu Yue
| Challenge: | Existing methods for agentic reinforcement learning rely on sparse outcome-based reward for training, leading to suboptimal results. |
| Approach: | They propose an agent-based reward model that produces structured feedback for agentic trajectories, including an explicit reasoning trace and a focused critique. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model produces structured feedback for agentic trajectories including an explicit reasoning trace, a focused critique, and an overall score that evaluates process performance. |
Similar Papers
AgentV-RL: Scaling Reward Modeling with Agentic Verifier (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Jiazheng Zhang, Ziche Fu, Zhiheng Xi, Wenqing Jing, Mingxu Chai, Wei He, Guoqiang Zhang, Chenghao Fan, Chenxin An, Wenxiang Chen, Zhicheng Liu, Haojie Pan, Dingwei Zhu, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to improve LLM reasoning are limited in complex domains and lack external grounding makes verifiers unreliable on computation-intensive tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that transforms reward modeling into a multi-turn, tool-augmented deliberative process. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework surpasses state-of-the-art ORMs by 25.2% under parallel and sequential TTS. |
R-PRM: Reasoning-Driven Process Reward Modeling (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing Process Reward Models (PRMs) output evaluation scores directly, limiting both learning efficiency and evaluation accuracy. |
| Approach: | They propose a Reasoning-Driven Process Reward Modeling (R-PRM) which activates inherent reasoning to enhance process-level evaluation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms baseline models on ProcessBench and PRMBench by 13.9 and 8.5 F1 scores. |
Agentic Reward Modeling: Integrating Human Preferences with Verifiable Correctness Signals for Reliable Reward Systems (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing reward models focus on human preferences, neglecting verifiable correctness signals. |
| Approach: | They propose a reward system that combines human preference rewards with verifiable correctness signals to provide reliable rewards. |
| Outcome: | The proposed reward agent significantly outperforms vanilla reward models on benchmarks and inference-time best-of-n searches on real-world tasks. |
A Comprehensive Survey of Process Reward Models: Data Generation, Model Construction, and Usage (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Congmin Zheng, Jiachen Zhu, Zhuoying Ou, Yuxiang Chen, Kangning Zhang, Rong Shan, Zeyu Zheng, Mengyue Yang, Jianghao Lin, Yong Yu, Weinan Zhang
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have advanced reasoning ability, yet conventional alignment remains dominated by outcome reward models that judge only final answers. |
| Approach: | They summarize applications across math, code, text, multimodal reasoning, robotics, and agents . goal is to clarify design spaces, reveal open challenges, and guide future research toward fine-grained, robust reasoning alignment. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model enables finer credit assignment, richer diagnostics, and improved robustness. |
Aligning Agents via Planning: A Benchmark for Trajectory-Level Reward Modeling (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) evolve into agentic systems capable of autonomous tool invocation and complex reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a trajectory-level preference benchmark to evaluate judges' ability to distinguish preferred versus distractor agent trajectories in tool-integrated environments. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates how well judges distinguish preferred versus distractor agent trajectories in complex tool-using scenarios. |
Beneficial Reasoning Behaviors in Agentic Search and Effective Training Methods to Obtain Them (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Agentic search requires large language models to perform multi-step searches to solve complex information needs. |
| Approach: | They propose a training approach that equips agentic search models with reasoning behaviors before reinforcement learning (RL) they compare successful and failed trajectories and propose supervised fine-tuning and standard RL . |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms direct RL by 37.2% on three web benchmarks and 6.2% on seven multi-hop QA benchmarks. |
R-Search: Empowering LLM Reasoning with Search via Multi-Reward Reinforcement Learning (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Qingfei Zhao, Ruobing Wang, Dingling Xu, Daren Zha, Ma Bowen, Zhichun Wang, Shijie Jia, Limin Liu, Xin Wang
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in multi-step and long-chain reasoning, but extending their reasoning capabilities to encompass deep interactions with search remains a non-trivial challenge. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for Reasoning–Search integration that integrates multi-reward signals to optimize the reasoning–search interaction trajectories. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on seven datasets show that R-Search significantly outperforms mainstream RAG baselines. |
Igniting Creative Writing in Small Language Models: LLM-as-a-Judge versus Multi-Agent Refined Rewards (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for enhancing Large Language Models (LLMs) struggle with novelty and Reinforcement Learning from human feedback (RLHF) is costly. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a Reward Model (RM) and a principle-guided LLM-as-a-Judge to enhance creative output over baselines. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach significantly enhances creative output over baselines, but the principle-guided LLM-as-a-Judge yields superior generation quality. |
ReRec: Reasoning-Augmented LLM-based Recommendation Assistant via Reinforcement Fine-tuning (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing reasoning-augmented systems that handle complex queries are lacking . we present a framework that enhances LLM-based recommendation assistants . |
| Approach: | They propose a reinforcement fine-tuning framework that enhances LLM-based recommendation . they use a dual-graph Enhanced Reward Shaping framework to integrate recommendation metrics . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms state-of-the-art recommendations and preserves core abilities. |
Watch Every Step! LLM Agent Learning via Iterative Step-level Process Refinement (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent approaches to enhance agent performance focus on outcome rewards, which may lead to errors or suboptimal actions due to the absence of process supervision signals. |
| Approach: | They propose a step-level framework that provides detailed step-by-step guidance to enhance agent training by using Monte Carlo methods. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms strong baselines on three tasks and shows that it is effective in augmenting efficiency and its applicability to diverse models. |