Papers by Srinivas Ravishankar
X-FACTOR: A Cross-metric Evaluation of Factual Correctness in Abstractive Summarization (2022.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Subhajit Chaudhury, Sarathkrishna Swaminathan, Chulaka Gunasekara, Maxwell Crouse, Srinivas Ravishankar, Daiki Kimura, Keerthiram Murugesan, Ramón Fernandez Astudillo, Tahira Naseem, Pavan Kapanipathi, Alexander Gray
| Challenge: | Abstractive summarization models produce factually inconsistent summaries that are not supported by the original article. |
| Approach: | They propose a fact-aware filtering mechanism that improves the factuality of abstractive summarization models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves the quality of training data and the factuality of generated summaries. |
Leveraging Abstract Meaning Representation for Knowledge Base Question Answering (2021.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Pavan Kapanipathi, Ibrahim Abdelaziz, Srinivas Ravishankar, Salim Roukos, Alexander Gray, Ramón Fernandez Astudillo, Maria Chang, Cristina Cornelio, Saswati Dana, Achille Fokoue, Dinesh Garg, Alfio Gliozzo, Sairam Gurajada, Hima Karanam, Naweed Khan, Dinesh Khandelwal, Young-Suk Lee, Yunyao Li, Francois Luus, Ndivhuwo Makondo, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya, Tahira Naseem, Sumit Neelam, Lucian Popa, Revanth Gangi Reddy, Ryan Riegel, Gaetano Rossiello, Udit Sharma, G P Shrivatsa Bhargav, Mo Yu
| Challenge: | Existing approaches face challenges including complex question understanding and lack of large end-to-end training datasets. |
| Approach: | They propose a modular knowledge base question answering system that leverages AMR parses for task-independent question understanding. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system achieves state-of-the-art performance on two prominent KBQA datasets based on DBpedia. |
A Semantics-aware Transformer Model of Relation Linking for Knowledge Base Question Answering (2021.acl-short)
Copied to clipboard
Tahira Naseem, Srinivas Ravishankar, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya, Ibrahim Abdelaziz, Young-Suk Lee, Pavan Kapanipathi, Salim Roukos, Alfio Gliozzo, Alexander Gray
| Challenge: | Existing knowledge base question answering systems do not leverage the explicit semantic parse of the question text. |
| Approach: | They propose a transformer-based neural model that leverages the AMR semantic parse of a sentence. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms the state-of-the-art on 4 popular benchmark datasets. |
A Two-Stage Approach towards Generalization in Knowledge Base Question Answering (2022.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Srinivas Ravishankar, Dung Thai, Ibrahim Abdelaziz, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya, Tahira Naseem, Pavan Kapanipathi, Gaetano Rossiello, Achille Fokoue
| Challenge: | Existing approaches for Knowledge Base Question Answering focus on a specific knowledge base or evaluating it on underlying knowledge base requires non-trivial changes. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that separates semantic parsing from knowledge base interaction . they propose KBQA framework that allows generalization across knowledge bases . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves comparable or state-of-the-art performance on datasets with a different knowledge base. |
SYGMA: A System for Generalizable and Modular Question Answering Over Knowledge Bases (2022.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Sumit Neelam, Udit Sharma, Hima Karanam, Shajith Ikbal, Pavan Kapanipathi, Ibrahim Abdelaziz, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya, Young-Suk Lee, Santosh Srivastava, Cezar Pendus, Saswati Dana, Dinesh Garg, Achille Fokoue, G P Shrivatsa Bhargav, Dinesh Khandelwal, Srinivas Ravishankar, Sairam Gurajada, Maria Chang, Rosario Uceda-Sosa, Salim Roukos, Alexander Gray, Guilherme Lima, Ryan Riegel, Francois Luus, L V Subramaniam
| Challenge: | Knowledge Base Question Answering (KBQA) systems have limited generalizability across knowledge bases and multiple reasoning types. |
| Approach: | They propose a modular approach for KBQA that is built on a framework adaptable to multiple knowledge bases and reasoning types. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach is generalized across multiple knowledge bases and reasoning types. |