Papers by Qingyang Liu

9 papers
Towards Reward Fairness in RLHF: From a Resource Allocation Perspective (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: if rewards are imperfect, they can adversely affect the alignment of large language models (LLMs).
Approach: They propose a bias-agnostic method to address the issue of reward unfairness from a resource allocation perspective without specifically designing for each type of bias . they apply methods Fairness Regularization and Fairness Coefficient to achieve fairness in rewards.
Outcome: The proposed method achieves fairness in rewards while minimizing biases . it can be applied to verification and reinforcement learning scenarios .
USB: A COMPREHENSIVE AND UNIFIED SAFETY EVALUATION BENCHMARK FOR MULTIMODAL LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing safety benchmarks fail to provide reliable assessments due to limited risk coverage, insufficient scale and the oversight of complex modality combinations.
Approach: They propose a framework that covers 61 risk categories across four modality interactions to address this gap.
Outcome: The proposed framework covers 61 risk categories across four distinct modality interactions.
kNN-ICL: Compositional Task-Oriented Parsing Generalization with Nearest Neighbor In-Context Learning (2024.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent advances in task-oriented parsing involve formulating the task as a sequence-to-sequence problem, relying on a wealth of labeled data.
Approach: They propose a task-oriented parsing framework that integrates nearest-neighbor learning with a nearest-nearest approach.
Outcome: The proposed model can be used to synthesize computer programs based on a natural-language prompt without additional data or specialized prompts.
CausalEval: Towards Better Causal Reasoning in Language Models (2025.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) have been used for a variety of tasks, including problem-solving, decision-making, and understanding of the world.
Approach: They propose a review of existing methods aimed at enhancing LMs for causal reasoning . they categorize existing methods as reasoning engines or as helpers providing knowledge or data to traditional methods .
Outcome: The proposed methods perform better than existing methods on a range of tasks.
PsychEthicsBench: Evaluating Large Language Models Against Australian Mental Health Ethics (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Mental disorders affect nearly one in seven people worldwide, yet the vast majority do not receive adequate care.
Approach: They propose a framework to evaluate LLMs' ethical knowledge and behavioral responses through multiple-choice and open-ended tasks with fine-grained ethicality annotations.
Outcome: Empirical results across 14 models reveal that refusal rates are poor indicators of ethical behavior, revealing a significant divergence between safety triggers and clinical appropriateness.
MOOCCube: A Large-scale Data Repository for NLP Applications in MOOCs (2020.acl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Massive open online courses (MOOCs) are a popular educational platform for advanced research.
Approach: They propose to use MOOCCube to build a large-scale data repository of over 700 MOOC courses, 100k concepts, 8 million student behaviors with an external resource.
Outcome: The proposed datasets show that they can facilitate research in MOOCs.
Just Ask One More Time! Self-Agreement Improves Reasoning of Language Models in (Almost) All Scenarios (2024.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting has been shown to be effective on complex reasoning tasks, but the naive greedy decoding used in CoT prompting causes the repetitiveness and local optimality.
Approach: They propose a generalizable ensemble-optimization method that uses a set of reasoning paths to prompt a language model one more time to determine the optimal answer.
Outcome: The proposed method can be generalized to almost all scenarios where the type of input questions and answer format of reasoning paths may be unknown.
SPPD: Self-training with Process Preference Learning Using Dynamic Value Margin (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing approaches to improve numerical and logical reasoning of Large Language Models are limited . existing approaches rely on prompt engineering and pretrained knowledge to ensure correctness .
Approach: They propose to train LLMs with process-based reasoning using a dynamic value margin . they use the Bellman optimality equation to derive a value margin for step-level preference optimization .
Outcome: The proposed method is equivalent to on-policy policy gradient methods under constrained reward functions.
Unlocking the Black Box of Latent Reasoning: An Interpretability-Guided Approach to Intervention (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for large language models (LLMs) lack a coherent representation of reasoning steps.
Approach: They propose a set of latent reasoning interventions that enable latent thinking and decode-time interventions that refine the latent process by imposing the identified geometric and semantic priors.
Outcome: The proposed models unlock latent capabilities and improve reasoning accuracy without any parameter updates.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations