Papers by Jiangshu Du
LLMs Assist NLP Researchers: Critique Paper (Meta-)Reviewing (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Jiangshu Du, Yibo Wang, Wenting Zhao, Zhongfen Deng, Shuaiqi Liu, Renze Lou, Henry Zou, Pranav Narayanan Venkit, Nan Zhang, Mukund Srinath, Haoran Zhang, Vipul Gupta, Yinghui Li, Tao Li, Fei Wang, Qin Liu, Tianlin Liu, Pengzhi Gao, Congying Xia, Chen Xing, Cheng Jiayang, Zhaowei Wang, Ying Su, Raj Shah, Ruohao Guo, Jing Gu, Haoran Li, Kangda Wei, Zihao Wang, Lu Cheng, Surangika Ranathunga, Meng Fang, Jie Fu, Fei Liu, Ruihong Huang, Eduardo Blanco, Yixin Cao, Rui Zhang, Philip Yu, Wenpeng Yin
| Challenge: | a comparative analysis of paper (meta-)reviews by large language models (LLMs) aims to identify and distinguish LLMs from human activities . |
| Approach: | They present a comparative analysis to identify and distinguish LLM activities from human activities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed analysis aims to improve recognition of instances when someone implicitly uses LLMs for reviewing activities. |
kNN-ICL: Compositional Task-Oriented Parsing Generalization with Nearest Neighbor In-Context Learning (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Wenting Zhao, Ye Liu, Yao Wan, Yibo Wang, Qingyang Wu, Zhongfen Deng, Jiangshu Du, Shuaiqi Liu, Yunlong Xu, Philip Yu
| Challenge: | Recent advances in task-oriented parsing involve formulating the task as a sequence-to-sequence problem, relying on a wealth of labeled data. |
| Approach: | They propose a task-oriented parsing framework that integrates nearest-neighbor learning with a nearest-nearest approach. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can be used to synthesize computer programs based on a natural-language prompt without additional data or specialized prompts. |
MultiFileTest: A Multi-File-Level LLM Unit Test Generation Benchmark and Impact of Error Fixing Mechanisms (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Yibo Wang, Congying Xia, Wenting Zhao, Jiangshu Du, Chunyu Miao, Zhongfen Deng, Philip S. Yu, Chen Xing
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation benchmarks for LLM unit test generation focus on function-level code rather than on more practical, challenging multi-file codebases. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-file-level benchmark for unit test generation covering Python, Java, and JavaScript. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that most LLMs exhibit moderate performance on MultiFileTest, highlighting the benchmark’s inherent difficulty. |
FOFO: A Benchmark to Evaluate LLMs’ Format-Following Capability (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks fail to assess large language models’ format-following proficiency adequately. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to follow complex, domain-specific formats. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework evaluates large language models' ability to follow complex, domain-specific formats across open-source and closed-source models. |