Papers by Jinbo Hu
Sparse-RL: Breaking the Memory Wall in LLM Reinforcement Learning via Stable Sparse Rollouts (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Sijia Luo, Xiaokang Zhang, Yuxuan Hu, Bohan Zhang, Ke Wang, Jinbo Su, Mengshu Sun, Lei Liang, Jing Zhang
| Challenge: | Existing methods for storing key-value caches during long-horizon rollouts cause performance collapses. |
| Approach: | They propose a new training paradigm that empowers stable RL training under sparse rollouts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model reduces rollout overhead while maintaining the performance. |
Topology Matters: Measuring Memory Leakage in Multi-Agent LLMs (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multi-agent LLMs are rapidly moving from prototype to real-world use . network topology is a first-order security parameter in multi-aggent systems . |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for comparing topology-conditioned memory leakage in multi-agent LLM systems. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework evaluates topology-conditioned memory leakage in multi-agent LLM systems. |
Attribution-Based Analysis and Optimization of Modular Agentic Workflows (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Yingxuan Yang, Bo Huang, Siyuan Qi, Chao Feng, Haoyi Hu, Yuxuan Zhu, Jinbo Hu, Haoran Zhao, Ziyi He, Xiao Liu, ZongYu Wang, Muning Wen, Lin Qiu, Xuezhi Cao, Xunliang Cai, Yong Yu, Weinan Zhang
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have driven the rise of agentic workflows . yet, how can we attribute performance gains to individual upgrades and their interactions? |
| Approach: | They propose a game-theoretic framework that models component upgrades as players and evaluates component coalitions to compute Shapley values. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework provides interaction-aware attribution and recommendation for model allocation under a fixed workflow structure. |
Rethinking Reasoning: A Survey on Reasoning-based Backdoors in LLMs (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent models such as OpenAI o1 and DeepSeek-R1 produce explicit reasoning traces, often via Chain-of-Thought prompting. |
| Approach: | They propose a taxonomy that offers a unified perspective for summarizing existing approaches and categorizing reasoning-based backdoor attacks into associative, passive, and active. |
| Outcome: | The proposed taxonomy categorizes reasoning-based backdoor attacks into associative, passive, and active. |
MorphoBench: A Benchmark with Difficulty Adaptive to Model Reasoning (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Xukai Wang, Xuanbo Liu, Mingrui Chen, Haitian Zhong, Xuanlin Yang, Bohan Zeng, Jinbo Hu, Hao Liang, Junbo Niu, Xuchen Li, Ruitao Wu, Ruichuan An, Yang Shi, Liu Liu, Qiang Liu, Zhouchen Lin, Xu-Yao Zhang, Wentao Zhang, Bin Dong
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks designed to evaluate the reasoning capabilities of large models are limited in scope and lack flexibility to adapt difficulty according to evolving reasoning capacities of models. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark that incorporates multidisciplinary questions to evaluate the reasoning capabilities of large models and can adjust and update question difficulty based on the reasoning abilities of advanced models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark incorporates multidisciplinary questions to evaluate the reasoning capabilities of large models and can adjust and update question difficulty based on the reasoning abilities of advanced models. |