Papers by Jiacheng Lu

10 papers
From Isolated Scoring to Collaborative Ranking: A Comparison-Native Framework for LLM-Based Paper Evaluation (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) are currently used to evaluate scientific papers by assigning an absolute score to each paper independently.
Approach: They propose a comparison-native framework for paper evaluation that integrates comparison into both data construction and model learning.
Outcome: The proposed framework achieves an average relative improvement of 21.8% over the strong baseline DeepReview-14B, while exhibiting robust generalization to five previously unseen datasets.
TreeBoN: Enhancing Inference-Time Alignment with Speculative Tree-Search and Best-of-N Sampling (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Best-of-N (BoN) sampling generates multiple responses and selects the best one, achieving improved performance but with a high computational cost.
Approach: They propose a framework that integrates a speculative tree-search strategy into Best-of-N (BoN) Sampling.
Outcome: The proposed framework outperforms Best-of-N (BoN) sampling but has high computational cost . tree-search strategy reduces computational overhead while maintaining high output quality .
Neo-Classic: A Benchmark for Evaluating Linguistic-Aesthetic Reasoning in Classical Chinese Poetry (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve high accuracy on established Classical Chinese Poetry benchmarks, but it remains challenging to distinguish transferable Linguistic-Aesthetic Reasoning from reliance on familiar pre-training patterns.
Approach: They propose a benchmark that combines a constructionist Out-of-Sample dataset with reverse understanding probes to evaluate large-scale large-format models.
Outcome: The proposed model performs well on classical Chinese poetry benchmarks, but a performance gap persists . the model can complete famous couplets and can be used to understand a variety of texts.
STORM-BORN: A Challenging Mathematical Derivations Dataset Curated via a Human-in-the-Loop Multi-Agent Framework (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing datasets suffer from outdated and insufficient challenging content, neglecting human-like reasoning, and limited reliability due to single-LLM generation.
Approach: They propose a human-in-the-loop, multi-agent data generation framework that integrates reasoning-dense filters, multiagent collaboration, and human mathematicians’ evaluations to ensure the reliability and quality of the dataset.
Outcome: The proposed framework improves accuracy and quality of the 2,000-synthesized datasets by integrating reasoning-dense filters, multi-agent collaboration, and human mathematicians’ evaluations.
Diagnosing Hidden Instabilities in Model Editing via Uncertainty Quantification (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods to update large language models (LLMs) without expensive retraining are fragile under single-edit evaluation protocols.
Approach: They propose a framework that characterizes activation-based editing as a constrained intervention on intermediate representations.
Outcome: The proposed method reveals local knowledge conflicts invisible to existing benchmarks.
Unexpected Phenomenon: LLMs’ Spurious Associations in Information Extraction (2024.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Information extraction (IE) tasks require a limited number of example instructions to achieve effective performance.
Approach: They propose two strategies to find spurious associations in large language models (LLMs) they use forward label extension and backward label validation to leverage extended labels to improve model performance.
Outcome: The proposed methods improve performance on Chinese and English datasets and 9.55%, 11.42%, and 21.27% in F1 scores on SciERC, ACE05, and DuEE datasets.
Role-Guided Annotation and Prototype-Aligned Representation Learning for Historical Literature Sentiment Classification (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Prior work focused on using sentiment lexicons or leveraging large language models for annotation . lexiconics are often unavailable for historical texts due to limited linguistic resources .
Approach: They propose a role-guided annotation strategy that prompts LLMs to simulate historical perspectives when labeling sentiment.
Outcome: The proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art baselines across historical literature datasets.
Generated Knowledge Prompting for Commonsense Reasoning (2022.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for commonsense reasoning rely on high-quality knowledge, but they are often dominated by large-scale pretrained models that are fine-tuned on a target benchmark.
Approach: They develop generated knowledge prompting which generates knowledge from a language model and provides it as additional input when answering a question.
Outcome: The proposed method improves state-of-the-art models on four commonsense reasoning tasks.
CrossWeigh: Training Named Entity Tagger from Imperfect Annotations (D19-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Named entity recognition (NER) models can identify labels in 5.38% of test sentences . a framework to handle label mistakes during NER model training is proposed .
Approach: They propose a framework to manually correct label mistakes in named entity recognition (NER) they aim to improve the accuracy of models by re-evaluating popular models on corrected test sets .
Outcome: The proposed framework can detect label mistakes in 5.38% of test sentences . the proposed framework improves on three datasets with a high-performance model .
Rainier: Reinforced Knowledge Introspector for Commonsense Question Answering (2022.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent research shows that relevant knowledge can provide useful context for commonsense tasks.
Approach: They propose a method that learns to generate contextually relevant knowledge in response to given questions.
Outcome: The proposed method shows consistent gains over 9 commonsense benchmarks.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations