Papers by David Garcia

4 papers
The iRead4Skills Intelligent Complexity Analyzer (2025.emnlp-demos)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: 20% of EU adult population exhibits low-literacy and numeracy skills (EA, 2021).
Approach: iRead4Skills Intelligent Complexity Analyzer integrates a range of NLP components to assess input texts along multiple levels of granularity and linguistic dimensions in Portuguese, Spanish, and French.
Outcome: The system assigns four tailored difficulty levels and introduces four diagnostic yardsticks—textual structure, lexicon, syntax, and semantics—offering users actionable feedback on specific dimensions of textual complexity.
Only a Little to the Left: A Theory-grounded Measure of Political Bias in Large Language Models (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Political biases in language models can affect performance in many applications . political biased models are often left-leaning, but are generally more left- leaning for instruction-tuned models .
Approach: They propose to use the Political Compass Test to measure political bias in language models . they use survey-based evaluation tools to test prompts and classify their political stances .
Outcome: The proposed model is based on the Political Compass Test, but is not scientifically valid.
Transcending Scaling Laws with 0.1% Extra Compute (2023.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing scaling of language models is expensive and requires significant computational costs.
Approach: They propose a method that substantially improves existing language models and their scaling curves with a relatively tiny amount of extra compute.
Outcome: The proposed method significantly improves existing language models and their scaling curves with a relatively tiny amount of extra compute.
Missing the Margins: A Systematic Literature Review on the Demographic Representativeness of LLMs (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: 211 studies on the demographic representativeness of large language models have conflicting results . 29% of the studies report positive conclusions on the representativeness, 30% do not evaluate LLMs across multiple demographic categories or within demographic subcategories.
Approach: 211 papers review the representativeness of large language models . authors recommend more precise evaluation methods and comprehensive documentation of demographic attributes .
Outcome: 211 studies on the representativeness of large language models are reviewed . 29% of the studies report positive conclusions, but 30% fail to specify subcategories . authors recommend more precise evaluation methods and documentation of demographic attributes .

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations