| Challenge: | Many essays are submitted to tutoring services by English learners on the Web every day . few systems provide focused suggestions on how to raise the level of proficiency. |
| Approach: | They propose a method for generating suggestions on a sentence for improving proficiency . they propose identifying grammatical elements and ranking related elements to provide suggestions . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method helps english learners improve their writing and reading skills. |
Similar Papers
Controlled Language Generation for Language Learning Items (2022.emnlp-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in pre-trained language models have resulted in success in generating fluent English text. |
| Approach: | They propose to employ natural language generation to rapidly generate English language items . they experiment with deep pretrained models and develop methods for controlling items for factors relevant in language learning . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework shows high grammatically scores for all models and higher complexity over baseline models. |
What Does LLM Refinement Actually Improve? A Systematic Study on Document-Level Literary Translation (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Shaomu Tan, Dawei Zhu, Ke Tran, Michael Denkowski, Sony Trenous, Leonardo F. R. Ribeiro, Bill Byrne, Felix Hieber
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have made document-level machine translation increasingly practical, enabled by long-context modeling and strong generation quality. |
| Approach: | They propose to use document-level MT followed by segment-level refinement to find the strongest and most stable improvements across six LLMs and seven language pairs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms error-specific prompting and evaluate-then-refine schemes in document-level translation. |
LinggleWrite: a Coaching System for Essay Writing (2020.acl-demos)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing writing services that provide feedback on writing skills are not providing sufficient "coaching" information. |
| Approach: | They propose a writing coach that provides writing suggestions, assesses writing proficiency levels, detects grammatical errors, and offers corrective feedback in response to user’s essay. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system improves on public test sets and shows that both AES and GED models achieve state-of-the-art performance. |
LEAF: Language Learners’ English Essays and Feedback Corpus (2024.naacl-short)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current automated essay scoring models lack the granularity desired by learners and instructors seeking more detailed insights. |
| Approach: | They present a corpus of English essays and their corresponding feedback from the “essayforum” website. |
| Outcome: | The LEAF corpus provides valuable feedback for students and teachers . it provides insights on argumentative aspects and organizational coherence . |
Personalizing Grammatical Error Correction: Adaptation to Proficiency Level and L1 (D19-55)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Grammar error correction systems have become ubiquitous in a variety of software applications, but little is known about how to efficiently personalize them to the user’s characteristics, such as proficiency level and first language. |
| Approach: | They propose to adapt a general purpose neural GEC system to the proficiency level and the first language of a writer, using only a few thousand annotated sentences. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system improves on adapting to proficiency level and first language . the results are the broadest of its kind, covering five proficiency levels and twelve different languages. |
How Can We Know What Language Models Know? (2020.tacl-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work examines knowledge contained in language models by having the LM fill in the blanks of prompts such as “Obama is a __ by profession”. |
| Approach: | They propose mining-based and paraphrasing-based methods to automatically generate high-quality and diverse prompts, as well as ensemble methods to combine answers from different prompts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods improve accuracy from 31.1% to 39.6% on the LAMA benchmark for extracting relational knowledge from LMs. |
PLAES: Prompt-generalized and Level-aware Learning Framework for Cross-prompt Automated Essay Scoring (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing cross-prompt automatic essay scoring systems focus on obtaining shared knowledge specific to the target prompt, but this may not be feasible in practical situations because the target essay may not exist as training data. |
| Approach: | They propose a novel learning framework for cross-prompt automatic essay scoring to capture more general knowledge across different prompts and improve the model’s capacity to distinguish between writing levels. |
| Outcome: | The proposed learning framework captures more general knowledge across prompts and improves its capacity to distinguish between writing levels. |
Story-level Text Style Transfer: A Proposal (2020.acl-srw)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Text style transfer is a task that aims to change the style of input text to the target style while preserving the content to some extent. |
| Approach: | They propose to use story-level text style transfer to generate stories that preserve plot . they propose to employ BERT-based method, Story Realization method, and Graph-based methods . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method preserves the plot of the input story while exhibiting a strong target style. |
Can Large Language Models Automatically Score Proficiency of Written Essays? (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Automated essay scoring (AES) is one of the earliest research problems in natural language processing. |
| Approach: | They propose to use large language models to analyze and score written essays using four different prompts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models show comparable performance on four different prompts and a slight advantage over the state-of-the-art models. |
FEAT-writing: An Interactive Training System for Argumentative Writing (2025.coling-demos)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Argumentative writing is a critical skill for academic success, but many students struggle to develop these skills. |
| Approach: | They developed an online system that provides students with automated feedback and exercises for argumentative writing. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system improves argumentative writing quality among native English speakers and english-as-a-foreign-language learners. |