| Challenge: | a class of methods has emerged to learn linear maps between word embedding spaces of different languages. |
| Approach: | They propose to approximate word embedding spaces using linear maps . they show that the underlying maps are non-linear but vary by a proportion of distance . |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods can be used to test non-linear methods and drive the design of more accurate maps for word translation. |
Similar Papers
NORMA: Neighborhood Sensitive Maps for Multilingual Word Embeddings (D18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for learning multilingual word embeddings assume that embeddable spaces of different languages exhibit similar structures. |
| Approach: | They propose a method for learning neighborhood sensitive maps to capture such differences . aim is to learn word vectors where similar words have similar vector representations . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art methods for translation between distant languages. |
Non-Linearity in Mapping Based Cross-Lingual Word Embeddings (2020.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work on cross-lingual word embeddings rely on linear mappings, but this assumption is not true for all language pairs. |
| Approach: | They propose a non-linear mapping approach which can find non-linesar relationships between languages by kernel Canonical Correlation Analysis. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach improves on five language pairs on supervised and self-learning scenarios. |
Analyzing the Limitations of Cross-lingual Word Embedding Mappings (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for cross-lingual word embeddings have limited results . existing methods require little or no cross-linguistic signal to work . |
| Approach: | They compare offline mapping methods to an extension of skip-gram that jointly learns both embedding spaces. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method yields more isomorphic embeddings, is less sensitive to hubness, and achieves stronger results in bilingual lexicon induction. |
Analyzing the Surprising Variability in Word Embedding Stability Across Languages (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Word embeddings are powerful representations that form the foundation of many natural language processing architectures. |
| Approach: | They explore word embedding stability in a wide range of languages to gain insight into their stability. |
| Outcome: | The proposed results provide insights into word embedding stability in English and other languages. |
Linear Cross-Lingual Mapping of Sentence Embeddings (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies show that a sentence has less ambiguity than a single word . if the word semantics is changed in translation, then a better translation is possible. |
| Approach: | They propose a linear cross-lingual mapping to improve multilingual embeddings . they also consider deviation from orthogonality conditions as a measure of deficiency . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves the multilingual embeddings by allowing for a linear cross-lingual mapping. |
A Closer Look on Unsupervised Cross-lingual Word Embeddings Mapping (2020.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for word embeddings are limited to a single, unannotated corpus, which means that word representations with similar meaning in distinct languages can be very different. |
| Approach: | They propose an unsupervised method for cross-lingual word embedding mapping that uses stochastic initialization and isometric initialization to verify the method's robustness. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method is robust on different embedding representations and new language pairs, particularly those involving Slavic languages like Polish or Czech. |
Revisiting the Context Window for Cross-lingual Word Embeddings (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to mapping-based cross-lingual word embeddings are based on the assumption that the source and target embeddable spaces are structurally similar. |
| Approach: | They propose to use different context windows to evaluate bilingual word embeddings in various languages, domains, and tasks. |
| Outcome: | The size of both the source and target window improves bilingual lexicon induction, especially on frequent nouns. |
Improving Cross-Lingual Word Embeddings by Meeting in the Middle (D18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Cross-lingual word embeddings are becoming increasingly important in multilingual NLP. |
| Approach: | They propose to apply an additional transformation after initial alignment to align two disjoint monolingual vector spaces. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms state-of-the-art models in monolingual and cross-lingual evaluation tasks. |
LNMap: Departures from Isomorphic Assumption in Bilingual Lexicon Induction Through Non-Linear Mapping in Latent Space (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for bilingual lexicon induction are mapping-based, but they do not hold for closely related languages. |
| Approach: | They propose a semi-supervised method to learn cross-lingual word embeddings for BLI using a linear mapping function and a latent space of two independently trained autoencoders. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms existing models on 15 different language pairs on both directions. |
Unsupervised Cross-Lingual Representation Learning (P19-4)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a comprehensive survey of cutting-edge weakly-supervised and unsupervised cross-lingual word representations is presented . |
| Approach: | This tutorial provides a comprehensive survey of recent work on weakly-supervised and unsupervised cross-lingual word representations. |
| Outcome: | This tutorial provides a comprehensive survey of cutting-edge weakly-supervised and unsupervised word representations. |