| Challenge: | Existing approaches to relation classification are noisy and time-consuming . RCEND uses noisy data to split noisy data into correctly and incorrectly labeled data . |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to enhance relation classification by exploiting noisy data . they use an instance discriminator with reinforcement learning to split noisy data into correctly and incorrectly labeled data based on the noisy data. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art models on relation classification . the proposed method is based on a semi-supervised learning method . |
Similar Papers
Robust Distant Supervision Relation Extraction via Deep Reinforcement Learning (P18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Distant supervision is an efficient method for relation extraction, but it is noisy. |
| Approach: | They propose a deep reinforcement learning strategy to generate false-positive indicators . they redistribute false positives into negative examples to reduce false positive problem . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method significantly improves the performance of distant supervision compared to state-of-the-art systems. |
GAN Driven Semi-distant Supervision for Relation Extraction (N19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for relation extraction are limited to costly hand-labeled training sets and hard to be extended to large-scale relations. |
| Approach: | They propose a semi-distant supervision approach for relation extraction by constructing a small accurate dataset and properly leveraging numerous instances without relation labels. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach achieves significant improvements over baselines on real-world datasets. |
Label-Free Distant Supervision for Relation Extraction via Knowledge Graph Embedding (D18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to generate large scale labeled data for relation extraction produce noisy relation labels when there are multiple relationships between entities. |
| Approach: | They propose a method which assumes that a pair of entities appears in a Knowledge Graph and trains a relation classifier. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method performs well in the current distant supervision dataset. |
Revisiting Distant Supervision for Relation Extraction (L18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches for relation extraction (RE) use supervised learning on relation-specific training data, which is expensive to acquire. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a new testing dataset to re-examine distant supervision approaches . they aim to draw new conclusions based on the new testing data . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can generate training data without noise and bias issues . the proposed method is annotated by the researchers on Amzaon Mechanical Turk . |
DSGAN: Generative Adversarial Training for Distant Supervision Relation Extraction (P18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Distant supervision can effectively label data for relation extraction, but suffers from the noise labeling problem. |
| Approach: | They propose a sentence-level true-positive generator to learn a true-negative generator from a fuzzy sentence bag. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method significantly improves the performance of distant supervision relation extraction compared to state-of-the-art systems. |
Combining Distant and Direct Supervision for Neural Relation Extraction (N19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to train relation extraction with distant supervision use noisy labels and implicitly assumes that all the KB facts are mentioned in the text. |
| Approach: | They propose to combine distant supervision data with additional directly-supervised data to train relation extraction models by using sigmoidal attention weights with max pooling. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves state-of-the-art on the widely used FB-NYT dataset. |
Global Relation Embedding for Relation Extraction (N18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to extract textual relations with distant supervision are limited by their reliance on supervised training data. |
| Approach: | They propose to embed relations with global statistics of relations to combat the wrong labeling problem of distant supervision. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method is more robust to training noise introduced by distant supervision and improves relation extraction models. |
Distantly Supervised Relation Extraction in Federated Settings (2021.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to label training datasets using distant supervision are expensive and cannot cover all walks of life. |
| Approach: | They propose a federated denoising framework to suppress label noise in federation . they propose to use a multiple instance learning based denoisation method to select reliable sentences . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can select reliable sentences via cross-platform collaboration. |
Uncover the Ground-Truth Relations in Distant Supervision: A Neural Expectation-Maximization Framework (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for relation extraction assume that text is noisy, but its corresponding labels are clean. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that combines neural network and probabilistic modelling to denoise noisy relation labels. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves the current art in uncovering the ground-truth relation labels. |
Noise-Robust Semi-Supervised Learning for Distantly Supervised Relation Extraction (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Distantly supervised relation extraction (DSRE) methods are not capable of extracting relation labels for individual sentences. |
| Approach: | They propose a semi-supervised learning relation extraction framework for sentence-level DSRE . they discard only the labels of the noisy samples and utilize them as unlabeled samples . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves significant performance enhancements on two real-world datasets. |