Label-Free Distant Supervision for Relation Extraction via Knowledge Graph Embedding (D18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to generate large scale labeled data for relation extraction produce noisy relation labels when there are multiple relationships between entities. |
| Approach: | They propose a method which assumes that a pair of entities appears in a Knowledge Graph and trains a relation classifier. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method performs well in the current distant supervision dataset. |
Similar Papers
Global Relation Embedding for Relation Extraction (N18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to extract textual relations with distant supervision are limited by their reliance on supervised training data. |
| Approach: | They propose to embed relations with global statistics of relations to combat the wrong labeling problem of distant supervision. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method is more robust to training noise introduced by distant supervision and improves relation extraction models. |
Improving Distantly-Supervised Relation Extraction with Joint Label Embedding (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for relation extraction treat labels as independent and meaningless one-hot vectors, which cause a loss of potential label information for selecting valid instances. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-layer attention-based model to improve relation extraction with joint label embedding by gating integration and using the embeddable entities as an atten- tion. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods in relation extraction with joint label embedding. |
Uncover the Ground-Truth Relations in Distant Supervision: A Neural Expectation-Maximization Framework (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for relation extraction assume that text is noisy, but its corresponding labels are clean. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that combines neural network and probabilistic modelling to denoise noisy relation labels. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves the current art in uncovering the ground-truth relation labels. |
Combining Distant and Direct Supervision for Neural Relation Extraction (N19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to train relation extraction with distant supervision use noisy labels and implicitly assumes that all the KB facts are mentioned in the text. |
| Approach: | They propose to combine distant supervision data with additional directly-supervised data to train relation extraction models by using sigmoidal attention weights with max pooling. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves state-of-the-art on the widely used FB-NYT dataset. |
Distantly Supervised Relation Extraction in Federated Settings (2021.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to label training datasets using distant supervision are expensive and cannot cover all walks of life. |
| Approach: | They propose a federated denoising framework to suppress label noise in federation . they propose to use a multiple instance learning based denoisation method to select reliable sentences . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can select reliable sentences via cross-platform collaboration. |
Incorporating Global Contexts into Sentence Embedding for Relational Extraction at the Paragraph Level with Distant Supervision (L18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to relation extraction (RE) only extract relations from sentences that contain two target entities. |
| Approach: | They propose to incorporate global contexts from paragraph-into-sentence embedding into RE . they propose to use a knowledge base to extract relations between pairs of entities . |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach can learn an exact RE from sentences without syntactic parsing. |
Hierarchical Relation-Guided Type-Sentence Alignment for Long-Tail Relation Extraction with Distant Supervision (2022.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Distant supervision uses triple facts to label corpus for relation extraction, leading to wrong labeling and long-tail problems. |
| Approach: | They propose a model to enrich distantly-supervised sentences with entity types by injecting context-free and -related backgrounds into sentences to alleviate sentence-level wrong labeling. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves state-of-the-art on benchmarks and in overall and long-tail performance. |
GAN Driven Semi-distant Supervision for Relation Extraction (N19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for relation extraction are limited to costly hand-labeled training sets and hard to be extended to large-scale relations. |
| Approach: | They propose a semi-distant supervision approach for relation extraction by constructing a small accurate dataset and properly leveraging numerous instances without relation labels. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach achieves significant improvements over baselines on real-world datasets. |
Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Relation Extraction without Supervision (D19-61)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing frameworks for relation extraction use distant supervision instead of annotated data. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to deal with relation extraction tasks without supervision . they use syntactic parsing and pre-trained word embeddings to extract relations . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms baselines on four biomedical datasets and achieves slightly worse results than the state-of-the-art in three out of four data sets. |
Robust Distant Supervision Relation Extraction via Deep Reinforcement Learning (P18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Distant supervision is an efficient method for relation extraction, but it is noisy. |
| Approach: | They propose a deep reinforcement learning strategy to generate false-positive indicators . they redistribute false positives into negative examples to reduce false positive problem . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method significantly improves the performance of distant supervision compared to state-of-the-art systems. |