Automated Paraphrase Lattice Creation for HyTER Machine Translation Evaluation (N18-2)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing machine translation evaluation metrics use synonyms and paraphrases to reward meaning-equivalent but lexically divergent translations. |
| Approach: | They propose a machine translation evaluation metric which exploits reference translations enriched with meaning equivalent expressions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed metric achieves medium performance on large and noisier datasets . it is compared with the existing HyTER evaluation metric . |
Similar Papers
UScore: An Effective Approach to Fully Unsupervised Evaluation Metrics for Machine Translation (2023.eacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | supervised evaluation metrics are not available for machine translation, despite their wide dissemination. |
| Approach: | They develop fully unsupervised evaluation metrics that leverage parallel data and evaluation metric induction. |
| Outcome: | The proposed metrics beat supervised competitors on 4 out of 5 evaluation datasets. |
Evaluating Automatic Metrics with Incremental Machine Translation Systems (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies have shown that neural metrics are more reliable than non-neural metrics. |
| Approach: | They propose to use commercial machine translations to evaluate machine translation metrics based on their preference for more recent outputs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset confirms several previous findings, including the advantage of neural metrics over non-neural ones, and also explores the debated issue of how MT quality affects metric reliability. |
Robustness Tests for Automatic Machine Translation Metrics with Adversarial Attacks (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | BERTScore, BLEURT, and COMET are automatic evaluation metrics that are often underperformed on adversarially-synthesized texts. |
| Approach: | They examine MT evaluation metric performance on adversarially-synthesized texts . they validate that automatic metrics tend to overpenalize adversarial-degraded translations . |
| Outcome: | The results show that automatic metrics tend to overpenalize adversarially-degraded translations. |
On the Evaluation Metrics for Paraphrase Generation (2022.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation metrics for paraphrase generation are not designed for the task, but adopted from other evaluation tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a new evaluation metric for paraphrase generation that uses reference-based and reference-free metrics. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation metric outperforms existing metrics and is more reliable than reference-based metrics. |
Putting Evaluation in Context: Contextual Embeddings Improve Machine Translation Evaluation (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation metrics are limited and can be easily portable to new languages. |
| Approach: | They propose a simple unsupervised metric and additional supervised metrics which rely on contextual word embeddings to encode the translation and reference sentences. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing metrics on the WMT 2017 dataset and is more accurate than existing models. |
Tangled up in BLEU: Reevaluating the Evaluation of Automatic Machine Translation Evaluation Metrics (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for judging metrics are sensitive to the translations used for evaluation, leading to falsely confident conclusions about a metric’s efficacy. |
| Approach: | They propose a method for thresholding performance improvement under an automatic metric against human judgements by using a pairwise system ranking method. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method allows quantification of type I versus type II errors incurred, i.e., insignificant human differences in system quality that are accepted, and significant human differences that are rejected. |
DEMETR: Diagnosing Evaluation Metrics for Translation (2022.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | BLEU scores are based on string overlap, but they are opaque in comparison to newer learned metrics. |
| Approach: | They propose a dataset to evaluate MT evaluation metrics based on linguistic perturbations in English . they find learned metrics perform substantially better than string-based metrics . |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset shows that learned metrics perform better than string-based metrics . the dataset contains 31K English examples that cover 35 different linguistic phenomena . |
Curious Case of Language Generation Evaluation Metrics: A Cautionary Tale (2020.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a few popular metrics are still used to evaluate language generation systems despite their known limitations. |
| Approach: | They propose to use automatic metrics to evaluate language generation systems . they show that they prefer system outputs to human-authored texts . |
| Outcome: | The proposed metrics are insensitive to correct translations of rare words and can yield high scores when given a single sentence as system output for the entire test set. |
Can Automatic Metrics Assess High-Quality Translations? (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a recent human evaluation study found that translations produced by current MT systems achieve very high-quality scores when judged by humans on a direct assessment scale of 0 to 100. |
| Approach: | They stress-test the ability of current translation quality metrics to detect correct translations . they show that current metrics often over or underestimate translation quality . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method overestimates translation quality, the authors show . they show that current metrics often overestimate translation quality . |
ParaAMR: A Large-Scale Syntactically Diverse Paraphrase Dataset by AMR Back-Translation (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Paraphrase generation is a long-standing task in natural language processing (NLP). |
| Approach: | They propose to generate large-scale syntactically diverse paraphrase datasets by abstract meaning representation back-translation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset is syntactically more diverse than existing datasets while maintaining good semantic similarity. |